# Profoundd archive — Epstein Files # Bates number: EFTA00268770 # Title: PRIOR -rc o2oI7 COPIRED I>Calel%n- 46 A Reakr vF # Dataset: 9 # Pages: 22 # Images: 22 detected # Tags: epstein, doj, dataset-9, image-described # Source PDF: https://profoundd.com/epstein-docs/EFTA00268770/download # Doc viewer: https://profoundd.com/epstein-docs/EFTA00268770 # # Text below is what Profoundd has extracted from the source PDF. # 'ocr-enriched' tag means OCR was applied to scan-only pages. # Image descriptions are AI-generated factual captions (llava:13b). #---------------------------------------------------------------------- === SUMMARY === PRIOR -rc o2oI7 COPIRED I>Calel%n- 46 A Reakr vF POtAC---E -77024e-mJG CAFFLICATION FOR ACCESS TO SAPOL RECORDS) (FREEDOM OF INFORi ATIO:. ACT-SECTION 13i A FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION PROOF OF IDENTITY IS REQUIRED • Please use BLOCK letters • If you need help, ask our staff DETAILS OF PERSON A Pia yiNG FOR ACCESS TO SAPOL RECORDS Name: (mr, wr, mat M$ M'S PE-efkCalel%n- 46 A Reakr vF POtAC---E -77024e-mJG CAFFLICATION FOR ACCESS TO SAPOL RECORDS) (FREEDOM OF INFORi ATIO:. ACT-SECTION 13i A FEE MUST ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION PROOF OF IDENTITY IS REQUIRED • Please use BLOCK letters • If you need help, ask our staff DETAILS OF PERSON A Pia yiNG FOR ACCESS TO SAPOL RECORDS Name: (mr, wr, mat M$ M'S PE-efkt (1\()I\J r NWOCCED CoVE-K dr/Cnt\ISPiKED. ITAIWIEP Act i--SS -TC NFOR 14A-r(ON) 4 EFTA00268775 Plc) KesitN,Ser PERiz.0(4A LLy REsPotaSc fzecelOriN rgorsi Poucc troBOb_st-4All • W 30103/2016 Dear Grant Stevens, Jacqueline Pearce I am contacting you today in ration to the reporting of illegal police activity and price targeting_ within the district of Port Pirie concerning the Port Pirie Police Department Kadina Police department and police departments within the South Australian metropolitan areas. I wish to advise you that I have reported the illegal activities that I have encountered by the above mentioned police departmentspver a 2 - 5 year period, and that of immediate family members to the following legal organisations, b members of government and various law firms, in relation to the threats fraudu made ainst m f and my thildren in regards to Paul Gardner, Port Germ to m Ombudsman Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner SA Medical Association • Telecommunications ombudsman • FBI , Houston via email services • UK Govemment via email services • Tasmanian Government via emai services • Geoff Brock Rowan Ramsay Westside Lawyers , Port Pile David Prendergast. Kadina Johnson Lawyers, Adelaide Lachlan McAuliffe, Port Pirie yk, In relation to the following : • Fraudulent activity - Telecommunication systems - Utility accounts - Banking Institutions - Sharing of personal information - Altered medical reports - Real Estate Agencies - local businesses - Postal services - various members of the public - Illegal broadcasts of registered business files and personal information • Sexual intent - personal - Online dating sites • Physical assaults • Suspected sexual assaults - personal - online dating sites - intent without my knowledge • Falsified charges • Emotional trauma • Falsified witnesses and witness statements • Illegal representation • Illegal access to medical records • Illegal release of medical records • Denial of Legal Aid. Bill Otham, Voumard Lawyers. Port Pirie, in relation to granted Legal Aid, Heidi Salvemini, Westside Lawyers, Port Pirie • Vicious harassment - Telecommunication systems • 000 call transferred - Reporting of Paul Gardner - Threats of prostitution - Suspected child abduction - Entrapment • Police targeting • Theft of registered business concepts, Regional Development Board, Port Pine • Loss of education - my child • Physical assaults and targeting - my child 1 EFTA00268776 In relation to the charges 13 / 03 / 2015, Constable Port Pirie Police Department, I have encountered the illegal representation of Heidi alvemini, Westside lawyers, Port Pirie Adelaide firm, illegal access to confidential medical records, illegal ordering of having myself remanded into custody fora mental health evaluation, conducted within the Port Pine Courthouse, Pre - Trial Conference - Closed Court Hearing - 11 / 03 / 2016. In relation to these charges ConstableMNIMMI Port Pine Police Department, I was informed upon my arrest dated 13 / 08 / 2015, that the charges of resisting arrest carried an Instant 12 month suspension of my licence which had resulted in a report upon the Port Ririe Registar of Motor Vehicles . of which had stated that the 12 month suspension of my licence in relation to these charges was due to an alcohol related incident. During the dosed court hearing conducted via video link, Port Pine Courthouse - 11 / 03 / 2016 - I was denied the lifting of the 12 month suspension of my licence and was informed by the Magistrate to complete an application to have my licence re— instated within the Port Pirie Fines Department and was quoted the amount of $256.00 for the application to be processed. -Ac I am requesting a thorough investigation be applied into the reported incidents and the consideration of the m - instatement of my licence be investigated and the 12 month suspension lifted, charges placed against myself by the Port Pine Police Department be withdrawn and all documented personal evidence, DNA, fingerprints and photographs be removed from the system and the frst and second charges be re - opened and investigated which have incurred in fines, in relation to the reported information of which I have supplied. Refer to attached Your sincerely Jacqueline Pearce EFTA00268777 Ab\itsiNG N4tic-RE lo REititT vArio 7O Co N,\TziC_IT For complaints against Pollen Officers you should contact the Office of the Police Ombudsman on Yours sincerely, Werner van Wyk LEGAL OFFICER (ETHICS AND PRACTICE) Telephone: Facsimile: Email: IC t Nt)OcQED 2 EFTA00268778 I want to make a complaint Your Name vote- Nome Address Your Postal Address It Orwell lo ytui home address) YOL C Email Address Yore Phone Nuntboris Any Special Instructions Contea sic POLICE OMBUDSMA Correffpondence to aga ADELAIDE SA 5001 taw! c, East Wing, 55 Currie Teoutinii Faifli Email Me jute row, Nimes "SFxe, t.ta. C C (Cot. N4tN Fy.tiot Siturb gen kurs your tier ("re) ace_ i jci I trtit CrfNER PERSON Their Name Their Home Address Their Posts' Address in ilineon la youu how., and, 04,41 Their Phone Numbects Woo are they,&Jun Coe Nom Weil TO pTTA creel" Simone Site %Ed Wis-frars. See: :arsitaYg': klitnius Now one? Are you prepared to authorise Ole Police Ombudsman to speak :c !Ns person')P4.tf.a>lr Petah kttle • - OPIRCERS SWUM Nagle Station Rana Badge No. Car No First Officer Second Officer ileF frrs cHey, In Uniform/ Ye: Age tappcoxl DeSelpticyi Appearance Thal Officer N. Fourth Officer Yes N3 EFTA00268779 De: Re-Fey' men dC d PlaPPeng v+.11.,re ;1118PPen' Cart To. Tres cf SuNnb Heatesi Cams Sired ,~_r_irirryMftnnlia pt-r7Pc wee) ReFe-R -co firteecet et) StleOj Fr/IMPS 8 fii i Crrn • cA %Ca.. -laine..a‘ra i eicrio-k %cock ScskJak tnicrr( Foinncc-4-4erci sNo~e-rts _folsi,£ted t,‘5,4 resscs , ,1010vicciSleck t-t reseeS friatieinent I ttecrl Itre SN(e_Sea-> irkCXIN Or) in reAakten -4° CrKence", Pircs - ssoki cc -1c,w9e.-1-inc3 - atKence> NrAt doel 10in • P CAI CC hcarrossrinent • conacek rekciator) verotr-lci inc,acn+S Pat)t Carcirer• So` ccancc-k ton -ko iccsa oc-ktkle-Itå in relcchon 40 ()do Gear drei- (so lice- -kcir--kin and actr-JatillS as• trArreclic,-Ic 4antILN tncinnbers. • Pc:AN ce 40« T-4, na n Nrekkk ic.4-) -k. named v•i-knc-SSCS I-tcia‘ scAl‘thnkr -n, its-Eskoketca.,au iys >tx->eAS vehicle cic.irnixd gcle_fecA ncri ice nr,..4 _pines teNcorra relcrlicn -torse-Fed trnmecitoIC -{'amt eneiri‘t v's IvJ NrXtErrtcl in reka+ILn +3 Se Non (4 I l cence • Repos-4Ø tncicfrAi-i4AS -4-vcritienng ‘tific.x.,t - • Paul Gcnckær itetvoi-ltd incieitenks 5,cspleck chtlå etc/Ice-hen und s->comt-t Sig :etl WARNING -it ,k an offenc, to make a false statekrrt n a scirplaznt EFTA00268780 Denied investigation - Denied illegal conduct If calling please ask for: Ms Dart in Pearce Dear Ms Pearce, IM POLICE OMBUDSMAN I refer to your complaint dated 23 March 2016. You complain about various interactions you have had with police, which you believe indicate police are targeting you and your sons. In particular you raise two instances where police took action against you in relation to driving with the prescnbed concentration of alcohol in your blood. You also complain about your arrest on two occasions: 13 August 2015 and 5 February 2016, taking issue with the charges laid against you and the police account of events. Of I advise that from the information you provide, it appears the police officers involved in the 'incidents have engaged in routine police procedures in relation to their contact with you. This includes conducting random breath tests, responding to reports from the public, making an arrest based on a reasonable suspicion of an offence. compliance with custody procedures in relation to searches and use of cells. In my view there is no evidence of police misconduct in relation to the concerns you raise In relation to your complaint that the charges against you have no merit and your request to be supplied with evidence, these are issues that need to be addressed through the court process. In other words, if you dispute the charges, you will need to do so in court. This office does not become involved in matters which are before the court. I have therefore made a determination pursuant to section 21(1)(d) of the Police (Complaints and Disciplinary Proceedings) Act 1985 not to referyour complaint for investigation as in my view it would be unlikely to reveal evidence of misconduct on the partpf a police officer and therefore such investigation is unjustifiable. per Yours faithfully Police Ombudsman vi ... ... c •l, East '.i La IL': Coyne' GP., F,0. 464 ADELAIDE tr.t. SOO I EFTA00268781 If calling please ask for: Ms Dart Reference: 2016/37388 Dear Ms Pearce, 4 I refer to your letter 14 April 201 addressed to the Commissioner of Police. This letter has been forwarded to my office for assessment. After reading the letter, it appears to relate to the same incidents you raised in your complaint dated 23 March 2016. IIIIPOLICE OMBUDSMAN 4. As I advised in my letter to you dated 6 April 2016, this office will not be referring your complaint for investigation. This is particularly because you have been charged in relation to the incidents you complain about. At this stage the circumstances of the incidents and any issues with the evidence relied on, is a matter to be canvassed in court and therefore not a matter for this office. Yours faithfully 4, Police Ombudsman per w Anvw.policeonioudsman.sa.guv.au Level 9, East Wing. SS Currie Street GPO Box 464 ADELAIDE SA 5001 EFTA00268782 _FeeszacRP . o2C Net l-C- (•-k. ('tiKeNtieS /APDRaS . 212 EFTA00268784 t~ENi6D Cgtt•-01M,l— 19C-1" I1/4).1-N Dewlap INYt-,IcttarnoN e-c) CORROPTIGK I OF POucE. GrAtein froRGEriN6 k Jacqueline Pearce Front Sent To: Cc: Subject Dear Ms Pearce, ACLEI Contact Dear Ms Pearce Thank you for making your complaint to the Office for Public lnteg ..ci2o2, • our complaint has been registered and referred for assessment to the Internal Investigation Section (IIS) of the South Australia Police. The IIS is responsible for assessing and investigating the conduct of police officers. Your complaint has been given a reference number, which is contained above. Please quote this number if you contact us. The IIS will provide you with a different reference number to use if you contact the IIS. Why has my complaint been referred to the IIS? Complaints and reports about police conduct are dealt with under the Police Complaints and Discipline Act 2016 (PCD Act). The PCD Act gives the IIS the primary responsibility for managing complaints and reports about police conduct and requires the OPI to refer complaints and reports to the IIS for assessment. The OPI will only refer a complaint or report about police to the Independent Commission Against Corruption in limited circumstances. What happens next? D The IIS will assess your complaint and decide whether further action is required. The OPI oversees this process. Complaints and reports assessed by IIS may be re-assessed by the OPI. Further action may be taken if the complaint or report is assessed as raising a potential issue of corruption, misconduct or maladministration in public administration, or a breach of discipline. For further explanation of how your complaint or report might be assessed, please refer to the factsheet. The VS will advise you of the outcome of its assessment Should you wish to contact the IIS ase email Can I tell people I have made a complaint? The PCD Act prevents you from disclosing or publishing certain information about your complaint or report, and penalties may apply for unauthorised disclosures or publications (see sections 45 and 46 of the PCD Act). Address: U. 101 Grenfell Street klelaide Sh 500;) GPO Mailbox 1332 Adelade st:bcoi Gener.ii eniotims 8463 51731Conolaints - 3207 1777 Ad•rjaiCa-a3P! sa gny.an vAvetaila S'a EFTA00268786 Some examples about what you can and cannot disclose or publish are provided in the attached factsheet. If you are unsure about what you can divulge about your complaint or report, or you want to seek permission to divulge information, please contact the OPI or seek independent legal advice. Yours sincerely Wa•tvz ,0241-1 Emma Townsend t vCskiec-Ue cc,NSPIRaTh ceoc) OP EFTA00268787 SOUTH AUSTRALIA POLICE SAFER COMMUNITIES 09 MarcL251! „... 2j _ aJcqueline Pearce Dear Ms Pearce bENtEt PCLIcE teiRC ETTN\C . I refer to your complaint against police received at the Internal Investigation Section (IIS) of the South Australia Police (SAPOL) on 07 February 2022. It has nto the complaints management system and assigned registration numbebrallit. I have reviewed your complaint and carried out an assessment pursuant to sections 13 and 14 of the Police Complaints and Discipline Act 2016 (the Act). __________-- I have noted th era hiiiirbeerCeviously assessed in another complaint that you made (number. tam now closing your new complaint as, vide section 15(a) of the Act, I consider it has already been dealt with by my section. Yours faithfully oanne Sharman APM Detective INTERNAL INVESTIGATION SECTIO • Government of eeict, South Australia %%Not 'Co C..cn1SP tksb Cc o ER OP tF Pcukc_e Atc.AiemEnii TA-CCIETC-I1 cRt MIN N— NICSI&C,RAC Service Integrity Leadership Collaboration Courage Respect South Australia Polloa, GPO Box 1539. Adelaide SA 5001 ABS $3 i'99 021 552 surspolice.sagov.au .------tem_e_4465526555555555555555 EFTA00268788 DEN teD I c.c.-ea6c c ft( hi (\hit 1V 67tA:tek. I-ARCA f N)C4 OFFICE FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY Our ref: Ms Jacqueline Pearce Dear Ms Pearce __— Thank you for your complaint to the Office for Public Integrity (OPI) of 3 February 2022 in which you allege that various government agencies and non-government organisations have engaged in money laundering, computer hacking, sexual crimes, intellectual property theft and corruption. ou also explain that you were detained at based on a false diagnosis and that SACAT wrongly ordered you to take medication that caused severe side effects. You say that Members of Parliament were invoked in or had Influence over the SACAT order. The OPI has reviewed the information you provided and assessed your complaint in accordance with the Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 2012 (ICAC Act). The ICAC Act provides that the OPI may determine to refer a complaint or report to another agency for further assessment or to take no further action. While I acknowledge that the experiences you describe have been distressing for you, I do not think that there is sufficient information available to support the allegations to justify a referral to another agency for further assessment. >;:, -___ ______, In fight of the abovo, I have determined to take no further action in respect of your complaint ursuant to section 18t(1)(c) of the ICAC Act. . As no further action will be taken, I will now close the file. Y Louise Schulz Manager Assessments •ffice for Public Integ trci-i)ED - coNsP(te ccueR up. C Ft' M iNteit t•• el WORK iNeoc_\)/6;ict S Pea. POLicE 15CPA2TVACKS-3 ti\cwAINO QuEENci--ANZ &ea._ "tJGiiss L'. 171 t II La 1 les ,,,,ity,;!-.172.; CA. iipInvis 67W 17 lui tv.V); t EFTA00268789 Atm ml ssioN1 CorIFESSOn1 MADE By A c'rtVE Pouce OFR teKS ACC )A1/410--UE1 - SA Pot- inwotV, nice to me and stated that she quite often frequented the Portside tavern, Port Pine to have coffee weekly with her friends. When leaving the Portside Tavern, Port Pine I got into my vehicle and discovered that it would not start. I sighted two younger men entering the Portside Tavern, Port Pine and I followed them into the establishment seeking assistance to start my vehicle. The two younger men encouraged me to sit with them to have a drink while I waited for them to assist me. I sat with the two younger men in the beer garden at the Portside Tavern. One of the younger men introduced himself as "Mat" and stated that he resided in Western Australia but was in Port Pirie on holidays. (Unusual destination for tourism) Mat proceeded to make sexual advances and became rude in nature ( arrogant and aggressive) I became defensive and stated that I did not like his behaviour, course of conversation and that I was leaving. Mat then reached across the table and grabbed my wrist and stated "Don't you want this then" and reached down to his pants and undid his zipper and exposed himself indecently. Nudity of genitals. I became angry with him and called him a rude pig and got up to leave. Mat stood up from the table and grabbed my arm. I reached out with my other hand to slap his face to make him let me go. Mat defended himself and slammed my hand down onto the table aggressively and would not let me go before pushing me backwards. I fell to the ground. A woman that was sitting on the other table in the beer garden jumped on top of me and was going to fight me (hurt me). I grabbed the back of her hair and the woman froze. The woman's friend yelled at me "Let her go, let her go" I let go of the woman that was on top of me and was rushed inside to the Portside Tavern and told to get in the Taxi that was waiting for me. That evening I took photographs of the bruising I suffered to my hands and wrists from the conflict of the attack Two weeks later I entered the Port Pine Police Station to report the incident and get police assistance. I was taken into an interview room and spoke to Detective Report Number :17/x62356 Date ; 7th December 2016 •••••••••••• • Detective stated that he was not able to investigate this matter because ; "I can't investigate as there's police officers involved" Detective informed me that he was unable to investigate the report I made on the incident at the Portside Tavern, Port Pine as the Security Footage was not working that day (Repeated pattern of denied security footage at the Portside Tavern, Port Pirie ) Managers Brad and Janette - Knowledge Detective then proceeded to state two days after I reported the incident that the witness's he questioned in relation to this incident had conflicting stories to mine. In question : Security footage was not obtained to know who was in the beer garden to question as witnesses. I was in the beer garden not inside the establishment where the employee's of the establishment were workin - no witnesses Who did Detective know who to question? The only witnesses to this event were myself, Mat, his friend and the two other women sitting at the other table, not on security footage as it was not working on the day. EFTA00268790 Knowledge of Illegal Activity involving Police officers, Government Targeting , and including Sexual Targeting Access to Government Illegal Surveillance Involvement in Police Targeting and government conspiracy to cover up Intellectual Property Theft occurring 1993 - 2020 - Refer to all files Reporting of Illegal Activi Branch PH : ark Stanlley Adelaide Division - Licensing Enforcement EFTA00268791 === IMAGE DESCRIPTIONS === [Image 1] The image shows a document that appears to be an application form for access to AOP records. The form is filled out with various details such as the name of the applicant, the date of birth, and the purpose of the request. There are handwritten notes and corrections on the form, indicating that it has been reviewed or edited. The form includes sections for the applicant's signature and the date of [Image 2] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or a report. It contains text and annotations, with handwritten notes and underlining. The document is titled "DENTERS LEGAL CALIFORNIA NETWORK TARGET MARKETING" and includes a date and a recipient's name. There are sections with headings such as "RE: CALIFORNIA NETWORK TARGET MARKETING" and "RE: CALIFORNIA NETWORK TARGET MARKETING." The text [Image 3] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or a form with handwritten annotations. The document is titled "OFFICE FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY" and includes sections with headings such as "OFFICE FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY," "OFFICE FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY," and "OFFICE FOR PUBLIC INTEGRITY." There are handwritten notes in red ink, highlighting certain phrases or sections of the document. The visible t [Image 4] The image shows a handwritten note on a piece of paper. The note appears to be a personal message or a list of items, possibly related to a personal matter or a shopping list. The writing is in black ink, and the paper has a visible crease in the middle, suggesting it may have been folded or handled. There are no visible names, dates, places, or logos that can be discerned from the image. The cont [Image 5] The image shows a document that appears to be a letter or a form with handwritten annotations. The document is titled "ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVITY, ACTIVI [Image 6] The image shows a handwritten note on a piece of paper. The note appears to be a response to an email or letter, as indicated by the reference to "your email" and "your letter." The writer has made corrections and annotations to the text, which suggests that they are addressing specific points or clarifying certain aspects of the original message. The handwriting is legible, and the note seems to