From Principles to Practice DIGITAL
Page 55 of 72 · From_Principles_to_Practice_DIGITAL.pdf
APPROACH 2
Integrate land into
re-use practices
Land circularity is a critical yet often-overlooked dimen-
sion of end-of-life and re-use strategies. While much of
the conversation around circularity focuses on mate-
rials and buildings, land itself must be considered a
finite resource that requires thoughtful regeneration
and re-use. A circular approach to land management
prioritizes adaptive re-use, infill development and the
revitalization of underused spaces, reducing the envi-
ronmental and social costs associated with unchecked
urban expansion. By prioritizing the re-use of existing
sites – e.g. through brownfield redevelopment, activating
vacant lots and reusing abandoned assets – cities can
curb urban sprawl,12 minimize habitat destruction and
optimize existing infrastructure. This mitigates the need
for new land development and strengthens communities
by reinvigorating neglected spaces, providing new amen-
ities, meeting local needs (e.g. housing) and cultivating
economic opportunities. Impact and economic viability
can be significantly enhanced when sites are pooled into
coordinated development programmes, though coordi-
nated approaches are still undeveloped globally.13 Denser,
more compact mixed-use development also reduces GHG
emissions when development is steered to well-connected
urban sites near transit hubs promoting low-carbon travel.
The Alliance seeks to drive a systemic shift in land use
to embed land circularity as a foundational principle of
sustainable and circular built environments. By integrating
land into re-use strategies, policy-makers and developers
can advance a low-carbon, resource-efficient, regenera -
tive and socially inclusive built environment that prioritizes
resilient, high-quality places over urban sprawl and new
land development.
INGRID SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC HUB
The InGrid Schneider Electric Hub transformed part of
the vacant Novkabel factory site in Novi Sad, Serbia
into a carbon-neutral, Leadership in Energy and Envi-
ronmental Design (LEED) Platinum-certified office for
Schneider Electric, setting the stage for wider regen-
eration. Rather than building on new land, the project
repurposed an 11,000 m2 industrial hall, preserving its
structure and cultural value while adapting it for modern
use. All dismantled materials were re-used, including
crushed concrete for sub-base layers. The project also
introduced green courtyards and improved transport
links, demonstrating how abandoned industrial sites can
be revived sustainably. As the first step in revitalizing the
entire Novkabel campus, it serves as a model for trans-
forming disused industrial zones into thriving mixed-use
districts. Pro-re-use amendments to the Serbian Planning
and Construction Act in 2023 facilitated its delivery and
further encourage replication across Serbia, reinforcing
the site’s role as a catalyst for broader redevelopment.
Read more in the Alliance’s InGrid Schneider Electric Hub
Innovative Practice case study.ELLINIKON PARK IN ATHENS
The Ellinikon Park project located in Athens, Greece,
repurposes a former international airport and brownfield
site, transforming obsolete infrastructure into a vibrant
urban space. Through adaptive re-use, the project pre-
serves existing buildings, remediates contaminated land
and incorporates reclaimed materials and energy-ef -
ficient design. By prioritizing re-use of infrastructure
and brownfield regeneration, Ellinikon Park reduces the
environmental impact of new development and creates
a sustainable public space that highlights the potential of
land circularity in urban redevelopment.
106APPROACH 3
Rethink the building value
chain to prioritize restoration,
remanufacturing and resource
optimization
The Alliance asserts that incremental adaptations of
existing supply chains are insufficient. A systemic over -
haul is needed to accelerate the transition to a truly
circular built environment. The current linear model
of material extraction, production, use and disposal
remains deeply entrenched, even with emerging re-use
initiatives. While efforts to integrate recycled materials
and improve waste diversion are steps in the right direc-
tion, they do not fundamentally disrupt the underlying
system that prioritizes new production over re-use and
repurposing. Without a comprehensive transformation,
the built environment will continue to generate exces-
sive waste, deplete finite resources and contribute to
embodied carbon emissions at unsustainable levels.14
A truly circular built environment requires a paradigm
shift that reimagines every stage of the value chain, from
material sourcing to end-of-life strategies. This includes
mapping and recovering materials already in circulation,
creating marketplaces for salvaged components and
redesigning buildings and infrastructure for adaptability,
deconstruction and re-use rather than obsolescence.
Policy incentives, financial models and procurement
standards must be aligned to drive demand for re-used
assets and materials, and support the infrastructure
needed to scale urban materials mining, restoration,
adaptive re-use and remanufacturing. Additionally,
design and construction practices must use fewer mate-
rials and resources overall. This would extend the
lifespan of existing assets and reduce reliance on virgin
resources. To accelerate these changes, resources
must be directed towards increasing knowledge capac-
ity across both public and private sectors at local
and national levels, for all actors in the process (from
policy-makers through to on-site delivery workers).
By shifting from a piecemeal approach to a systemic
transformation, leaders can embed circularity as the
foundation of urban development, ensuring long-term
environmental, economic and social resilience.
For further insight on the potential for realizing the dual
benefits of carbon dioxide reduction as well as substan-
tial economic gains across nine circularity loops for six
key building materials, see the Forum’s Circularity in the
Built Environment: Maximizing CO2 Abatement and Busi-
ness Opportunities. 107
Miloš MartinovićKevin Scott (@k7scott)
BAUBÜRO, SITU'S K.118 PROJECT,
IN WINTERTHUR
Baubüro in Situ’s K.118 project in Winterthur, Switzer -
land exemplifies innovative adaptive re-use and circular
construction practices. This endeavour transformed an
industrial building into a mixed-use space, incorporat -
ing offices, studios and residential units. Notably, over
60% of the building materials were sourced from decon-
structed structures, including reclaimed steel beams,
windows and facade elements. This approach not only
preserved the building’s historical character but also
minimized environmental impact by reducing the need
for new resources. The project challenged the traditional
linear construction model by prioritizing flexibility and
decentralized material sourcing, setting a new standard
for sustainable urban transformation.
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: