50 Investible Opportunities for a New Nature Economy 2026
Page 35 of 45 · WEF_50_Investible_Opportunities_for_a_New_Nature_Economy_2026.pdf
ACTION 3ACTION 2
Use conversations on nature transition plans and strategies to uncover nature-positive
investible opportunities hidden in “ordinary” operations and supply chains
Use data which is already available within company operations, supply chains and
public sources, recognising that early evidence of nature impacts may be directionalLeading companies are beginning to develop nature
transition plans, and practical guidance already
exists to help financial institutions assess the
credibility of these plans and track progress over
time – for example, the World Economic Forum’s
April 2025 report, Nature Positive: Corporate
Assessment Guide for Financial Institutions.
These plans can be used as a reference point
for structuring questions, comparing approaches
across peers and sectors, and anchoring
conversations in clients’ own transition journeys.
Many nature-positive opportunities remain under-
recognised because they sit within “ordinary”
operational or supply chain investments and are not
explicitly framed as nature-focused. Through deeper
dialogue, financial institutions and companies can
identify projects that influence key nature impact drivers – such as reducing water use, pollution
or land-use change. These opportunities include,
for example, operational changes that reduce
impacts at industrial sites, enhance water and
resource efficiency in factories, and promote more
sustainable sourcing in agriculture and other land-
intensive sectors. Once identified, these projects
can be shaped into financing solutions that support
implementation and scale-up.
To make this more systematic, nature should
become a standard part of strategy, project
pipeline and risk conversations. The opportunity
list presented in this report can be used internally
to help translate high-level ambitions into concrete
financing and investment opportunities across
sectors and client segments.
Financial institutions should take a pragmatic
approach to selecting nature metrics and
implementing MRV protocols. Although metrics
are complex and still evolving, the field is maturing
quickly and practical guidance on metric selection
and impact measurement already exists – for
example, Financing Nature: A Practitioner’s
Guide to Results Metrics Selection, a 2025 report
published by a range of regional development
banks. Early evidence of nature impacts may be
directional or incomplete, but this should not be
treated as a barrier to progress.
In many organizations, relevant nature-related data
already exists – found in company operations,
supply chains and public sources – but is siloed
from financial analysis. Where this information is available, financial institutions should ensure
it is integrated with existing financial datasets,
analytical tools and risk assessment frameworks,
so that nature considerations are reflected in
underwriting, portfolio management and strategic
decision-making.
Companies often lack clarity on which information
is most useful for financiers. Financial institutions
can help companies focus on the information that
matters most by signalling priority data needs –
such as the location of key assets, dependence
on stressed ecosystems and main sources of
nature pressure – as well as by sharing simple
templates and supporting pilots that improve data
quality, enabling more informed pricing, structuring
and monitoring of nature-related deals over time.
50 Investible Opportunities for a New Nature Economy
35
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: