Advancing China's Sustainable Blue Economy 2025
Page 20 of 34 · WEF_Advancing_China's_Sustainable_Blue_Economy_2025.pdf
20In China, the component of the account being
mainstreamed for strategic planning and policymaking
is the economic account, while the rest are either only
partially piloted at the local level or studied in research.
There is a need for developing a comprehensive ocean
accounting approach to advise policies and ensure
economic growth does not compromise ocean health.
Improving ocean accounting is crucial for informed
decision-making in the SBE. Non-market ecosystem
services should complement ocean economy satellite
accounts but should not be integrated into one
macroeconomic aggregate. Incorporating metrics related
to ocean health, ecosystem services and the link between
natural capital and economic productivity into national
accounts is a key strategy for implementing an SBE. For
China, besides the sustainable transformation of the
ocean industries, a vital next step toward an SBE is the
integration of more environmental and natural capital-
related information into its existing accounts, which should
fully reflect the health of the marine environment and
the development and societal contributions of the SBE.
China could benefit from engaging with GOAP, which aims
to incorporate marine sectoral and environmental data
into national decision-making, and participate in the co-
development of international standards.
Due to the varying data foundations and accounting
methods among countries, comparing the development
of the ocean economy on an international scale is still
challenging, highlighting the need for enhanced dialogue
and collaboration. There needs a stronger alignment
between China and the other countries on the scope
of ocean-related activities and define them and their
respective ratios (i.e., direct effects); then analyze input-
output reliance (i.e., indirect effects). The scope should
capture a wide range of indicators of the induced
effects like labor input, and scientific and technological
innovation. Moreover, it is important to research into sex-
disaggregated data concerning people, such as labor, so
that the differential impact of and contributions to the ocean
industry on women and men can be more fully understood.
Regular revisions of the ocean industry statistics accounting
system and the digitization of the industry data collection
and processing are also necessary.
50 McCook, L.J., Cai, L., Yeung, C.W., et al., 2025, “Marine ecosystem services and natural capital in China: Opportunities for improved understanding, valuing, and policy”, PNAS Nexus
2025 May 20;4(5):pgaf110. 3.2.2 Advancing the valuation of marine
ecosystem services in China
The ocean’s value extends beyond providing essential
resources; it also offers crucial ecosystem services such as
climate regulation, coastal protection, water conservation,
food supply, livelihoods and cultural value. Recognizing
these values is vital for sustainable ocean development.
Although valuing marine ecosystem services is complex,
initiatives like the shared wealth fund by WWF and the
attempts of marine ecological capital assessment by
the First Institute of Oceanography50 provide a starting
point.. China should develop a national approach to
valuing marine ecosystem services and integrate these
values into policy and economic development decisions.
Comprehensive marine data is essential for formulating
sustainable blue economic development plans and
improving the marine industry’s efficiency. However, China
currently lacks comprehensive laws and regulations on
marine information sharing. Addressing these challenges
requires adjusted policies to enhance data collection and
analysis, incentivizing public-private partnerships and
leveraging technological innovation.
Scientific and comprehensive marine data can provide a
solid foundation for the formulation of marine economic
development planning and policies, as well as assessing
the carrying capacity of the marine environment. This data
is crucial for improving the efficiency and competitiveness
of the marine industry, which is essential for the
development of the SBE. China’s ocean observation and
data network construction faces two major problems:
insufficient ocean observation facilities and incomplete
laws and regulations on marine information sharing
and service policies. The coverage of China’s marine
observation facilities is not wide enough, with certain
blind spots and gaps affecting comprehensive monitoring
and data acquisition. Additionally, China’s current marine
legal system lacks a relevant legal framework for marine
information management, including the ownership,
collection rights, attribution and transfer of marine
information. This has led to monopolization of marine
information and wasted national resources, directly
constraining the development of the SBE.
Patrick Yeung
Patrick Yeung
Patrick Yeung
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: