Advancing Responsible AI Innovation A Playbook 2025
Page 21 of 47 · WEF_Advancing_Responsible_AI_Innovation_A_Playbook_2025.pdf
Play 5
Adopt a systematic, systemic and context-
specific approach to risk management
The business implications of unmanaged AI risk exposure are far-reaching.
A systematic, systemic and context-specific approach is needed to align
responsible AI decision-making with risk-exposure and tolerances specific
to the organization’s business size, sector, jurisdiction, operational structure
and other contextual attributes.
Organization leaders
Key roadblocks that arise within the organization
Misperception of responsible AI maturity, creating an overestimation of progress in responsible
AI implementation46
Underestimation of risk management, viewing it more as a niche technical challenge than as an
enterprise responsibility
Low prioritization of risks, affecting AI risk mitigation and management measures, especially for
organizations with limited resources despite the various AI risk management frameworks available
Outdated procurement reviews, preventing the assessment of risks from AI vendors and third-party
software with AI features
Actions for organization leaders
–Conduct a maturity assessment: Companies
should assess the current state of their responsible
AI implementation. For example, the Global
System for Mobile Communications Association’s
(GSMA) Responsible AI Maturity Roadmap is an
industry-led initiative to help telecommunications
organizations adopt and measure responsible and
ethical approaches to AI.47
Best practices include:
–Comprehensive: Review governance
structures, policies, standards, risk
management processes, technical
safeguards, workforce capabilities, data
practices, accountability mechanisms and
alignment with responsible AI principles.
–Context-specific: Perform assessments
that are tailored to the context. –Repeat: Assess regularly to identify
improvements, as well as responsible
AI impacts and gaps that emerge with
the evolving landscape.
–Communicate: Provide the public
with transparency into the state of the
organization’s responsible AI practices
(see Play 6).
–Tailor high-level external frameworks to
organizational contexts: Invest in adapting
generalized risk assessment frameworks to
internal control structures, define sector-specific
risk scenarios, and integrate standardized and
repeatable risk management processes into
the organizational value chain and AI life
cycle checkpoints: design, development,
procurement, deployment and decommissioning
(see Case study 6).
Advancing Responsible AI Innovation: A Playbook 21
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: