Assessing Impact 2025
Page 3 of 4 · WEF_Assessing_Impact_2025.pdf
impacts on work-life balance. Example programmes include
one evaluated by Michel and colleagues in Germany13 and
one evaluated by Kiburz and colleagues in the US,14 both of
which showed positive impacts in reducing employees’ work-
family conflict.
Programs focusing on improving employees’ skills in coping
with work-related demands also have the potential to improve
work-life balance. For example, Althammer and colleagues
evaluated the impact of a training programme in which
employees learned self-regulation strategies to meet the
challenges associated with flexible work designs.15 Through
a randomized trial, they found that the training programme
improved employees’ psychological detachment from work,
well-being and work-life balance.
Training employees’ practical strategies to manage their work
and non-work roles can also contribute to improved work-life
balance. For example, a study evaluated an online self-training
intervention designed to help remote employees better structure
their workdays, establish healthy boundaries, proactively
shape their roles and restore energy after work.16 Their
results showed that the intervention significantly improved
employees’ ability to reduce work-family conflict while
increasing work-family facilitation.
Another study evaluated a training resource transfer training
programme that taught participants to intentionally transfer
knowledge, skills, values and positive emotions gained at
work into their family roles.17 Findings from this randomized,
longitudinal study showed that the training programme
increased workers’ work-family enrichment.Conclusion and recommendations
As today’s workforce places greater value on work-life balance,
organizations and leaders face both an opportunity and a
challenge. The opportunity lies in attracting and retaining
top talent while boosting the productivity, engagement and
commitment of these workers. The challenge is identifying and
implementing the right workplace work-life balance programmes
at the organization, team, or employee level.
The evidence in this brief demonstrates that well-designed
interventions – at the organization, team, or employee level
– can improve work-life balance. However, there is no one-
size-fits-all solution; a programme effective in one context may
not work for another. Therefore, it is essential for organizations
and leaders to assess their workforce’s needs and available
resources before deciding which level to target, what type of
programme to implement, how best to deliver it, and how to
meet the needs of the more vulnerable employees.
Additionally, careful review of evidence and recommendations
from existing work may allow organizations and leaders to
achieve more desirable outcomes. Ultimately, promoting work-
life balance through evidence-based work-life programmes is
more likely to build a productive, healthy and resilient workforce
to meet the challenges of the modern world.
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: