Building Geopolitical Muscle 2026
Page 14 of 29 · WEF_Building_Geopolitical_Muscle_2026.pdf
Different objectives guiding geopolitical muscle mandate FIGURE 5
Best practices Description
Board and CEO
sponsorshipMandate visibly anchored at the top and communicated to the rest of the organization, signalling geopolitics as
a leadership priority. Board sponsorship is critical, and the geopolitical muscle needs to adopt a long-term view.
Delegation
of authorityThe geopolitical muscle is able to act, convene and orchestrate geopolitical responses, not simply to inform,
with clear roles across functions.
Expanded purpose The mandate goes beyond reactive risk management to include anticipatory and offensive approaches.Reaction AnticipationOffence
DefenceOpportunistic capture
Illustrations:
– Capitalizing on US–EU trade negotiations
to push specific provisions
– Entering market vacated by competitor
due to export controls
Crisis management
Illustrations:
– Qualifying a new supplier urgently because
of sanctions
– Re-routing supply chains after Red Sea attacks
– Exiting Russia in 2022Strategic shaping
Illustrations:
– Acquiring a strategic asset in (geo)politically
sensitive market
– Collaborating early with regulators on
specific regulatory matters
Future proofing
Illustrations:
– Stockpiling inventories for a critical product ahead
of US elections
– Preparing a Taiwan, China contingency playbook
Source: Executive interviews – World Economic Forum, IMD Business School, BCG analysis
CASE STUDY 3
Allianz: Bringing geopolitics insights where decisions are made
Allianz accelerated the structuring of its geopolitical
capabilities back in 2019. What began as a largely regulatory
affairs function under the group CFO evolved rapidly into a
broader Regulatory and Political Affairs (RPA) function. By
2022, it was elevated to report directly to the group CEO.
Led by a long-time Allianz executive, the core RPA
department at HQ level is supported by a regulatory and
political affairs core group spanning key regions and business
lines, which defines the global RPA strategy, methodologies
and priorities (15-plus stakeholders) and exchanges regularly
on current issues. Its mandate: help Allianz both navigate
and shape the firm’s regulatory and political environment.
The team reports into core decision-making bodies across
finance, risk, strategy and operations. As the Head of Group
Regulatory and Political Affairs puts it, “We moved from
hosting three or four of our own steering committees per year
to having a seat in the forums where decisions are made.”Geopolitical monitoring is anchored in a structured, data-
driven approach and performed from different perspectives.
The firm’s Political Stability Grid tracks political risk across
25-plus key markets. It integrates internal exposure data
with external inputs and evaluates developments over
multiple time horizons. Findings are delivered at least twice
a year, or more frequently as needed, with optional deep
dives for business units. In addition, a geopolitical risk
update, delivered at least three times a year, offers deep
dives into the four to five of the most significant geopolitical
risks. The product portfolio is complemented by previews
ahead of critical elections. A one-year scenario planning
process ahead of the 2024 US election exemplifies its
impact. Working across different functions, including
economic research and risk management, the team
ensured that strategic responses were aligned, proactive
and board-ready.
Source: Interviews, company analysis
Building Geopolitical Muscle: How Companies Turn Insights into Strategic Advantage
14
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: