Building Geopolitical Muscle 2026
Page 16 of 29 · WEF_Building_Geopolitical_Muscle_2026.pdf
–Quantitative integration: The most advanced
approach embeds geopolitical variables directly
into financial planning and forecasting – for
example, one company tracks more than
60 country indicators aggregated into core
business variables linked to revenue, cost
and exposure sensitivity.
Despite the widespread availability of information,
data and commentary, the use of AI for geopolitical sensing remains limited. Most companies still rely
on manual curation or consultant summaries to
filter noise. A few, however, are experimenting
with AI pilots to automate signal processing. One
company reported training a large language model
(LLM) on its proprietary methodology to collect,
synthesize and generate board-ready materials.
As AI tools mature, they may increasingly support
early-warning systems, scenario generation and
rapid briefing production.
Best practices Description
Hybrid intelligence
modelCombines internal data (operations, supply chain) with external sources (advisers, think tanks). First-hand
information through connections remains important.
Standardized
and quantified
assessmentConverts geopolitical risk into shared business metrics (e.g. value-at-risk, enabling comparison and prioritization).
Efficient
information flowsMaintains steady regular updates and concise CEO briefings instead of lengthy memos.
AI tools
implementationBoosts productivity and helps filter through the noise.
CASE STUDY 5
Rio Tinto: Coordinating cross-functional task forces
through agile project management
Rio Tinto’s early attempt to provide geopolitical expertise via
generalist political advisers lacked impact with business units.
“We had good conversations,” recalls the Head of Group
Government Relations and Civil Society, “but it was not
always in a language that the business could act on.”
The company has since shifted to a more distributed,
business-integrated model anchored in operational exposure.
Geopolitical response is owned by Government Relations
and Civil Society, orchestrating cross-functional task forces.
Each group – typically around 10 people spanning legal, risk,
procurement, commercial and regional teams – is tailored to a
specific issue, such as tariffs or US–China tensions, and meets
on a regular cadence. A dedicated project management office
(PMO) ensures action tracking and delivery.Rio Tinto uses niche external experts (sanctions lawyers,
trade negotiators, regional security analysts) tailored to the
issue. “We moved away from generalists, we now go niche,
and it is successful.” Risk is quantified in business terms
(volumes, cost, margin impact) and aggregated by central
teams. “The business absolutely quantifies the risk, and we
aggregate that view for the board.”
The model proved its value in 2025, when US tariffs were
introduced. With scenario planning in place, a task force
mobilized immediately to take action, adjusting supply
chains, engaging regulators and safeguarding customer
relationships. “We didn’t panic; we zoomed in on which
businesses were affected and proceeded to manage
the risks.”
Source: Interviews, company analysis
Building Geopolitical Muscle: How Companies Turn Insights into Strategic Advantage
16
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: