Circularity in the Built Environment 2024
Page 17 of 30 · WEF_Circularity_in_the_Built_Environment_2024.pdf
BlueCity project in Rotterdam
New York Circular City InitiativeBOX 3
BOX 4The BlueCity project in Rotterdam,
Netherlands, transformed a large swimming
pool into a hub for circular entrepreneurs.
The retrofit includes the reuse of existing structures and materials, with the commercial
wing composed of 90% reclaimed materials.
In addition, circular principles were applied all
through the retrofit process.26
This initiative aims to create “a city where no
waste is sent to landfill, environmental pollution
is minimized and thousands of good jobs are
created through the intelligent use of products and
raw materials.”29 The initiative estimates that $11 billion in economic benefits, more than 11,000
new jobs and the reduction of waste sent to landfill
to zero can be achieved. Today, roughly 60% of
the total solid waste generated in the city comes
from construction and demolition alone.30In contrast, North America’s building stock, with
an average commercial building age of around 30
years,27 presents challenges including suburban
sprawl, fewer incentive programmes for circularity
or retrofits and less stringent regulations. The region
also has a higher proportion of single-family homes,
complicating systems-wide retrofitting approaches. In the United States specifically, there is no national
framework for end-of-life waste payment, recycling
rates vary by state and landfill accounts for about
50% of municipal waste disposal.28 That said,
selected incentives and reverse logistics are being
implemented and initiatives such as the New York
Circular City Initiative show promise.
Developing regions in the Asia-Pacific experiencing
rapid urbanization present a different scenario. By
2050, more than half of the global urban population
is expected to be concentrated in Asia.31 Much of
the current building stock in this region is young
compared with North America and Europe, and
new construction is often more economically viable
than retrofits. While countries in Europe are poised
for a renovation wave, similar large-scale efforts
in Asia may take longer to emerge. However, the
region has an opportunity to establish a foundation
for circularity now. Economically advanced cities
in countries such as China, Japan, the Republic of
Korea and Singapore already collect 100% of waste
and have achieved high recycling rates.32 Shanghai
launched a three-year initiative aimed at reducing
the construction sector’s environmental footprint.33
The building stock in the Middle East is
characterized by a diverse mix of traditional and
modern structures, reflecting the region’s rapid
urbanization and economic growth. Countries
such as Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United
Arab Emirates (UAE) have experienced growth in
high-rise buildings and large-scale commercial
developments, driven by economic prosperity and
ambitious urban planning initiatives. These modern
structures often incorporate advanced engineering
and sustainable design principles, with varying
levels of focus on retrofitting. For example, Dubai
aims to retrofit 30,000 buildings by 2030.34 Across
the Middle East, continuous efforts are being made
to divert waste from landfill. Specifically, in the
UAE, a Circular Economy Council was established
in 2021 to promote sustainable practices. Increasing mandatory waste segregation and
raising awareness of waste costs could accelerate
circularity in the region.
In many African countries, a substantial proportion
of the building stock comprises informal settlements
and low-rise construction, for example in urban
areas experiencing a rapid annual population
growth rate of 1.1% (compared with 0.3% in other
regions).35 Despite efforts to improve the quality
and sustainability of the building stock through
various national and international programmes,
additional investment in dedicated socio-economic
programmes and infrastructure is needed.
The building stock in Latin America is undergoing
transformation through urban renewal projects and
sustainable construction practices including retrofitting
of existing structures. Incentive programmes
encourage stakeholders to eliminate low-quality
housing, reduce CO2 emissions and improve sewage
treatment. Despite these initiatives, overall retrofit
maturity remains comparatively low because of
fragmented supply chains and variable regulations.
These disparities underscore the opportunity for
stakeholders to consider region-specific strategies
to effectively implement circularity in retrofits based
on local building-stock quality, evolution of cities,
regulatory environments and infrastructure. Europe
can serve as a model, but success in other regions
will possibly require customized approaches that
account for existing building stock, urban growth
patterns and supporting infrastructure, among
other factors.
Circularity in the Built Environment: Unlocking Opportunities in Retrofits
17
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: