Climate and Competitiveness Border Carbon Adjustments in Action 2025
Page 32 of 42 · WEF_Climate_and_Competitiveness_Border_Carbon_Adjustments_in_Action_2025.pdf
2.4 Financial considerations
Companies have the option to harness
powerful approaches to financing, including
quantifying decision-making and accessing
transformative capital.Beyond the PACE framework, it is worth focusing
on two key financial considerations: cost–benefit
analyses and the development of government-
supported and sustainable financing strategies.
BCA-oriented cost–benefit analysis
Companies should evaluate how technologies and
projects deliver emissions reductions and carbon
cost savings, calculating abatement cost per tonne
of CO2e versus potential for total tonnes of CO2e
reduced for different projects (a marginal abatement
cost curve [MACC]).
Corporations should structure cost–benefit analyses
by setting GHG baselines across operations and
value chains and measure Scope 1, 2 and 3
emissions to identify the highest-impact reduction
opportunities and quantify emissions savings
from interventions. Companies can then prioritize
projects delivering multiple benefits – operational
improvements, measurable GHG reductions and
enhanced competitive positioning. They can also
quantify how decarbonization investments enhance
market access, particularly in BCA jurisdictions, and
strengthen supply chain relationships.Dynamic carbon-pricing scenario building and
probability analysis
The cost–benefit framework should incorporate
dynamic carbon-pricing scenarios, modelling
how different policy stringency levels affect
project economics over asset lifetimes. These
scenarios must recognize that while currently
hypothetical, costs created by BCAs will be real,
substantial and ever-increasing over the next
decade. Probabilistic analysis and simulations can
then inform internal carbon pricing points over
short- and long-term timeframes, and be factored
into cost-benefit analyses. Probabilistic analysis
can help organizations navigate uncertainty by
quantifying the likelihood of different outcomes,
making it a useful tool for assessing exposure to
evolving carbon prices, BCA adjustments and
other transition risks that cannot be predicted with
certainty. Scenarios should also include evaluating
how stakeholder engagement strategies may
achieve broader value-chain emissions reductions.
Climate and Competitiveness: Border Carbon Adjustments in Action
32
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: