Should such a platform be created, it would best be governed by a neutral host, such as an industry association, academic partner or public– private coordination body. It would require clear participation parameters defining: –What can be shared: Clearly defined categories for non-sensitive information stripped of any company-specific or commercially sensitive details –How contributions are validated before distribution: A review process, managed by the platform’s neutral host, to verify that submissions are reliable, accurate and relevant, and conform to agreed formats to ensure that all shared materials are high-quality, usable by others and do not contain proprietary or confidential content –How confidentiality and competitive interests are safeguarded: Strict governance measures, including data anonymization, aggregation and controlled access protocols, to prevent disclosure of competitive strategies, unique technological methods or commercially sensitive business information An effective collaboration model that ensures alignment with national priorities could be strengthened by aligning commercial incentives with national mobility priorities. Figure 3 highlights how different stakeholders would benefit from such collaboration. For example, service providers benefit from lower transaction costs and better access to qualified operators; operators improve use of their fleets by tapping into pooled demand signals; contractors increase their visibility in the market and gain access to a wider range of jobs. While a shared collaborative operational model can help overcome fragmentation, several limiting factors and risks need to be acknowledged, should such a collaborative model be implemented: 1. Stakeholder engagement uncertainty: The model depends on active participation from operators, OEMs, regulators and service providers. If stakeholders do not perceive clear value (or see sharing as a distraction from core business) participation will remain low. 2. Sensitivity of data: Even with anonymization, some players may fear that sharing operational templates or aggregated insights could expose competitive advantage or strategic priorities, which limits the scope and effectiveness of contributions. 3. Trust in data quality: Without a robust validation and review mechanism, stakeholders may question accuracy, relevancy and/or applicability. 4. Neutrality challenges: Selecting and sustaining a truly neutral host organization can be difficult. Governance must be carefully designed to avoid perceptions of bias. 5. Replication limits: While lessons from offshore wind and agritech are instructive, the specific safety, regulatory and airspace constraints in aviation make direct replication more complex. Ultimately, unlocking these enablers requires more than ad hoc collaboration. It calls for a structured mechanism that consolidates knowledge, aligns incentives and ensures that the network grows inclusively. Deployment Pathways for Advanced Air Mobility: Lessons from Early Implementation in Saudi Arabia 17

Deployment Pathways Advanced Air Mobility 2025