From Policy to Practice Actionable Recommendations for a Commercial Bioeconomy 2025
Page 25 of 39 · WEF_From_Policy_to_Practice_Actionable_Recommendations_for_a_Commercial_Bioeconomy_2025.pdf
Before scaling comes R&D: how governments around the world
are increasing investments in government-funded research infrastructure BOX 6
Recently, governments are increasingly developing
partnerships to build key infrastructure. For
example, in Taiwan, China, the government has
teamed up with National Resilience to form Taiwan
Bio-Manufacturing Corporation (TBMC). Following
a model similar to Taiwan Semiconductor
Manufacturing Company (TSMC), which was
founded with government support and is now
the world’s largest chipmaker, TBMC will use the country’s expertise in smart manufacturing
and digital tech to produce cutting-edge
biomanufacturing solutions for complex medicines
like biologics, vaccines and gene therapies.54
Globally, infrastructure will continue to serve as
the backbone of a thriving, resilient bioeconomy,
the establishment of which requires significant
financial support from governments and beyond.
Summarizing framework recommendations
on blended and right-sized financing
What we’re striving for: a future where transformative bio-innovations
rapidly move from bench to market, powered by creative and blended
capital that matches the pace, risk and capital needs of scaling
breakthrough bioscience.
Currently, too many promising bio-innovations fail
to successfully navigate the “valley of death”, the
gap between lab success and commercial viability.
To address this, governments must intervene earlier,
committing larger investments at initial stages
to balance risk and attract private capital. These
investments must be flexible and appropriately
sized, considering the lengthy and unpredictable
development timelines and substantial capital
demands of bio-innovation.In addition to funding individual companies,
increased public investment in scaling infrastructure,
such as pilot facilities and biomanufacturing
hubs, is urgently needed. Proactive collaboration
between governments, corporations and VCs will
align risk tolerance and further enable scaling of
disruptive bio-innovation. Ultimately, bridging the
commercialization gap requires innovative capital
models that combine public and private funding
sources and are tailored to the unique needs of bio-
innovation. Financing is not just a support tool;
it is the strategic lever that will unlock the full
potential of the technology-driven bioeconomy.The Serbian government is set to break ground
on the BIO4 Campus later in 2025. An ambitious
biotechnology and biomedical research hub
currently under development in Belgrade, Serbia,
the BIO4 Campus will span approximately
30 hectares. It is set to become one of Europe’s
leading centres for life sciences, with a projected
investment of €450 million – the largest science-
related investment in Serbia’s history.51
In Saudi Arabia, the Research Development
Innovation Authority has implemented a national
policy to enhance access to government-
funded research infrastructure, including national laboratories. The policy promotes open access
to government-funded research infrastructure,
allowing external users (local and international)
to conduct research, development and
innovation activities.52
In the Eastern Hemisphere, the Kenya Biovax
Institute has been established to support
local vaccine production and bio-innovation.53
Positioned as a regional centre for life sciences
manufacturing, the institute is part of Kenya’s
broader strategy to build health sovereignty,
drive biotech R&D, and reduce dependence
on imported vaccines and biopharmaceuticals.
25 From Policy to Practice: Actionable Recommendations for a Commercial Bioeconomy
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: