Intergenerational Foresight 2026
Page 26 of 57 · WEF_Intergenerational_Foresight_2026.pdf
What if rural governance reimagined legitimacy through
intergenerational compacts co-created with the historically
marginalized, in which prosperity is defined and measured
by the health of ecosystems?
Across Latin America, rural territories sit at the
centre of a growing governance paradox. They are
foundational to the region’s ecological integrity, food
systems and cultural continuity, yet they remain
structurally marginal in political and economic
decision-making. For decades, development
strategies have treated rural areas as sites of
extraction or as spaces to modernize rather than as
partners in shaping collective prosperity.
This extractive and top-down development
approach has produced a legitimacy gap with
intergenerational consequences. Decision-makers
have prioritized short-term economic gains over
ecosystem health and territorial continuity. The
costs of this model are carried forward through
degraded land, stressed water systems, weakened rural economies and persistent outmigration of
younger generations. Governance systems struggle
to sustain trust, while future options narrow.
This provocation reframes rural governance as
a core site of intergenerational foresight. It asks
whether decision-makers can redefine legitimacy
and prosperity through binding intergenerational
compacts that they co-create with historically
marginalized communities and that make
ecosystem health a central measure of success.
In doing so, it positions rural Latin America not as
a development problem to be managed, but as
a critical arena for designing governance models
capable of sustaining well-being, legitimacy and
resilience across generations.
Latin America D
Intergenerational Foresight: An Approach for Long-Term Responsibility in Governance
26
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: