Nature Positive Corporate Assessment Guide for Financial Institutions 2025
Page 12 of 55 · WEF_Nature_Positive_Corporate_Assessment_Guide_for_Financial_Institutions_2025.pdf
Through consultations with global financial
institutions across banking, insurance and asset
management, the World Economic Forum has
developed a set of nature-related indicators that
financial institutions can use to assess their portfolio
companies and clients. The information collected
will also prepare financial institutions to comply with
future nature-related regulation. While the report
outlines what indicators financial institutions seek
to assess, it does not provide guidance on how
financial institutions should evaluate the corporate
information provided per indicator.
Given the profound interconnection between
nature and climate,20 this approach is closely linked
to existing climate transition plan assessment frameworks already in use by many leading financial
institutions – see Appendices (A2) for existing
examples of climate assessment frameworks.
Figure 5 outlines this perspective, evaluating how
financial institutions aim to approach assessments
of nature strategy and performance.
While the nature assessment indicators are sector-
agnostic overall, the relevance of the specific data
points will vary according to the sector and the
nature-related issues most material to a particular
company. For example, targets and policies
affecting freshwater use will most likely be more
relevant to a company in the agriculture sector than
one in the education sector, as indicated by the
sector-specific heatmap shown in Table 1.
Eleven indicators for financial institutions to assess companies on nature FIGURE 5
1Material nature impacts and dependencies, and risks and
opportunities
2Nature metrics
3Nature ambition
4Nature targets
5Strategy and actions
6Policies
7Governance
8Incentives
9Planned spend
10Independent verification of actions
11Supplier engagement planInterim indicators Target-state indicatorsIndicators used by financial institutions
to assess climate transition plansNature Climate
Engagement planOffsetsCapital expenditure and climate research
and developmentIncentivesGovernancePoliciesSector-specific actionsInterim and long-term GHG emission targets Ambition of targets (e.g. versus pathway)Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions baseline
and evolution of emissions from baselineStarting points
Ambition
and targets
Transition
credibility and
achievability
Source: World Economic Forum; Oliver Wyman.
Nature Positive: Corporate Assessment Guide for Financial Institutions
12
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: