Nature Positive Corporate Assessment Guide for Financial Institutions 2025
Page 23 of 55 · WEF_Nature_Positive_Corporate_Assessment_Guide_for_Financial_Institutions_2025.pdf
As a next step, financial institutions can drill down on
specific sectors of the heatmap and determine the
exposure of clients to dependencies and impacts
of specific financial or corporate assets – also
called “asset tagging”.33 Based on these findings,
financial institutions can prioritize engagement
with companies in sectors recognized for their
significant impacts or dependencies on nature. This engagement should focus on understanding
the assessments that have been conducted to
identify material nature impacts and dependencies,
as well as on understanding the potential financial
implications for the business. For example, financial
institutions might want to discuss how companies
in the agricultural sector would respond in a water
stress scenario that would impact food supply.
Metric types TABLE 2
Impact and dependency metrics Risk and opportunity metrics
–Impact driver metrics capture how companies’ operations are
impacting nature and are categorized based on the five drivers of
nature change.35 Examples of impact driver metrics include the
extent of land use change in square kilometres (km ²) (TNFD) or total
use of land area in metres or hectares (CSRD).
–Metrics for the state of nature capture changes to the ecosystems
impacted by the companies’ operations and help assess whether
a company’s actions are contributing to nature’s recovery or
deterioration. Terrestrial ecosystem conditions (Nature Positive
Initiative36) are an example of such metrics. State of nature metrics
are complementary to impact driver metrics.
–Dependency metrics capture how a company’s activities depend on
ecosystem services (e.g. use of water). –These metrics assess the level of risk or opportunity within
the organization.37
–These might be opportunity metrics – for example, the value
of operational cost savings associated with nature-related
management (TNFD) – or risk metrics – for example, the
anticipated financial effects of material risks and opportunities
arising from biodiversity- and ecosystem-related impacts and
dependencies (CSRD).
Table 3 shows a set of nature metric disclosures
that are commonly requested by leading initiatives
and regulation. The table highlights that a high level
of consensus has already been reached in initiatives
and regulation regarding the metrics to disclose.
Financial institutions seek the following information
from companies when assessing this indicator:
–Location-specific key metrics can be used
to quantify the company’s impacts and
dependencies on material nature-related issues.
Leading initiatives such as CSRD, TNFD, CDP
or GRI have published core metrics for nature
and biodiversity as well as interoperability
mappings of these metrics, increasing financial
institutions’ ability to compare and benchmark
companies within and across sectors. –Location-specific key metrics can be
used to assess a company’s risks and
opportunities stemming from identified impacts
and dependencies.
–Historical trends for key nature metrics, such
as Ecoregion intactness scores over previous
years, can be used to assess a company’s
performance over time.
Existing frameworks that companies may
be using:
–CSRD/ESRS: Disclosure standards provide
requirements on disclosure for nature-
related metrics.38 As location-
specific data
becomes available,
nature metrics will
increasingly be
used to evaluate
the scale of a
company’s impact
and dependency
on nature.2.2 Indicator 2: Nature metrics
As location-specific data becomes available, nature
metrics will increasingly be used to evaluate the scale
of a company’s impact and dependency on nature,
and will serve as benchmarks for both measuring
companies’ progress over time and comparing
companies. However, like carbon emissions, it will
take time for companies to reliably quantify progress
benchmarks across the entire value chain.
Nature is multidimensional and, as such, there
is no single metric that captures its complexity.
Nature change is driven by five impact drivers – climate change, land, freshwater or ocean use
change, resource use or replenishment, pollution or
pollution removal, and invasive species introduction
or removal34 – that financial institutions anticipate
companies will increasingly report. Each impact driver
can be associated with several metrics like water,
soil or non-greenhouse gas (GHG) air pollutants, and
companies may report metrics for the nature loss
and changes in ecosystem services that result from
impact drivers. For dependencies, companies may
report the metrics for the changes in the state of
nature or ecosystem services on which they depend.
Nature Positive: Corporate Assessment Guide for Financial Institutions
23
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: