Nature Positive Corporate Assessment Guide for Financial Institutions 2025
Page 27 of 55 · WEF_Nature_Positive_Corporate_Assessment_Guide_for_Financial_Institutions_2025.pdf
Numerous
companies across
various sectors,
particularly large
ones, have well-
articulated nature
ambitions.Existing frameworks that companies may
be using:
–TNFD: Draft guidance on nature transition plans
includes a component on nature ambitions in
the nature transition plan disclosure section.45
–Nature Strategy Handbook: Building on the
ACT-D (assess, commit, transform and disclose)
framework, the Nature Strategy Handbook
provides guiding questions, recommendations
and resources on how to develop
a nature ambition.46
–Accountability Framework Core Principles:
This provides a high-level framework for setting
supply chain goals, taking action and assessing
progress in efforts to make supply chains in
agriculture and forestry more ethical.47
–Capitals Coalition’s Beta Framework for
Integrated Decision-making: This outlines
seven required steps to integrating the value of capital (natural, social, human, produced)
into decision-making.48
–Nature benchmarking initiatives state
expectations around the nature ambitions of
companies such as Nature Action 100.49
How financial institutions are getting started:
Numerous companies across various sectors,
particularly large ones, have well-articulated nature
ambitions. Companies like Ørsted, GSK and
Holcim are good examples, having expressed their
aim to contribute to the nature-positive movement
and the goals of the GBF. While science-based
or science-backed nature target setting through
SBTN and similar pilots is still under development,
overarching nature ambitions – for instance, those
that pledge achieving the nature-positive goal by
2050 – are more common but vary widely. They
continue to help financial institutions understand
company commitments to nature and the relative
maturity of those commitments.
2.4 Indicator 4: Nature targets
A company’s nature targets are a more detailed and
quantified specification of a company’s ambition
within a clear timeframe. Ideally, target statements
include interim targets that indicate short- and
medium-term milestones and the pathway to
long-term targets. Targets can be set in line with a
mitigation hierarchy (such as AR3T, which stands
for avoid, reduce, restore and regenerate and
transform) at site and project levels to ensure
companies prioritize actions that mitigate nature
impacts in the first instance where possible. An
initiative by SBTN provides a framework and
guidance for setting science-based targets for
nature, helping companies align their environmental
goals with scientific evidence. Aligning targets with
scientific evidence is not yet mainstream given
inherent methodological challenges – however, it
has various advantages, such as increased investor
confidence and resilience.50 Financial institutions
seek the following information from companies
when assessing this indicator:
–If the targets are science-based and developed
in line with available guidance such as SBTN or
validated by SBTN
–If the targets are specific, measurable,
achievable, relevant and time-bound (SMART)
and location- or ecosystem-specific –If the targets encompass all material impacts
(such as in the case where a company’s water
extraction is having a material impact on an
ecosystem) and dependencies – this informs
whether financial institutions might expect to
have a water withdrawal and consumption (m3)
target in place for that location
–If the targets are developed in line with
a mitigation hierarchy (such as AR3T)
–Which parts of the company’s business model
and value chain are covered
–If the targets are set for short-, medium- and
long-term periods – for example, ESRS defines
these periods analogously to the periods
used by financial institutions in their financial
statements for short-term (up to five years),
medium-term and long-term (more than five
years)51
–If the targets are aligned with national and
international policy objectives on nature and
biodiversity, such as GBF, countries’ NBSAPs
or other policy commitments and regulations
27
Nature Positive: Corporate Assessment Guide for Financial Institutions
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: