Nature Positive Corporate Assessment Guide for Financial Institutions 2025
Page 9 of 55 · WEF_Nature_Positive_Corporate_Assessment_Guide_for_Financial_Institutions_2025.pdf
The momentum for assessing corporate nature
performance is building
This report aims to outline a practical approach that
financial institutions can apply to assess company
efforts to align their strategies with the protection
and restoration of nature. This approach will help
them to identify key information related to their
portfolio companies.
In a recent survey conducted by Oliver Wyman and
the World Economic Forum, financial institutions
identified areas where they believe more guidance
is required to support further capital allocation to
nature. Overall, four key areas were identified by
more than 70% of surveyed financial institutions: –Quantification of risks
–Quantification of opportunities
–Understanding financing needs for real-economy
companies (including the analysis of key trends,
sectors and technologies)
–Methodology to evaluate corporate performance
on nature and company nature transition plans
Motivated by this finding, this report advises
responding to the need for guidance by providing
a collective perspective on how financial institutions
can assess companies’ nature efforts and impacts.Sector reports BOX 1
The World Economic Forum, together with
the World Business Council for Sustainable
Development and Business for Nature, has issued
17 sector reports analysing nature-related business
opportunities. These reports identify four to five
priority business actions for each sector, grounded
in each sector’s key nature-related impacts and
dependencies, and risks and opportunities.
Tackling these opportunities will require substantial
investments of over $4.6 trillion. For example, one priority action for the automotive sector is to expand
circularity to avoid and reduce material waste across
the value chain. This will require investments in new
technologies and efficiency-increasing mechanisms
enabling companies to enhance processes and
reuse more materials. This would lower the sector’s
negative effects on nature. For more information on
sector-specific opportunities to unlock value through
nature-positive transitions, please see the Nature
Positive Transitions: Sectors report series.
Financial institutions survey – areas of guidance FIGURE 4
Which areas would you like guidance from industry standard setters and think tanks on,
to enable your organization to increase financing to the nature-positive transition?
0PercentageBusiness case: quantification of risks/risk scenario analysis
(quantification of financial risk under different scenarios)
Business case: quantification of opportunities
Financing needs from real economy companies
(e.g. analysis of key trends/key sectors/technologies/themes to finance)
Methodology to evaluate corporates’ nature-positive transition plan
and their performance on nature
Case studies of other financial institutions’ nature-specific projects/
deals/transactions
Case studies of other financial institutions’ investment/lending/
underwriting policies (e.g. how to define “nature-related green business”)
Nature-related metric and target setting for financial institutions
Impact and dependency assessment
Financing/investment/insurance mechanisms/instruments/blueprints
(e.g. nature-related financing products/services to offer)
Understanding of sector-specific material risks and opportunities,
and priority actions for real economy sectors
Target setting for financial institutions irrespective of disclosures/targets
set by real economy
Case studies of other financial institutions’ stewardship on nature
Case studies of other financial institutions’ governance structures for nature78%
75%
75%
72%
67%
67%
67%
64%
61%
58%
56%
47%
47%
Source: World Economic Forum; Oliver Wyman.
Nature Positive: Corporate Assessment Guide for Financial Institutions
9
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: