Navigating Global Financial System Fragmentation 2025
Page 19 of 46 · WEF_Navigating_Global_Financial_System_Fragmentation_2025.pdf
Scenario 3 – High fragmentation: This scenario
forecasts a financial decoupling that ceases
all economic exchanges between Eastern and
Western blocs. Neutral countries are subject to
moderate restrictions on capital and goods flows
but maintain their financial linkages and supply
chains with both the East and West. The costs
of fragmentation are severe for all three blocs,
with global output being reduced by 3.6% in the
short run. The Western bloc would see a decrease
similar to the impact of the Great Recession on its
respective economies. Global inflation is estimated
to increase by 3.5%. Scenario 4 – Very high fragmentation: The worst-
case, and least probable, scenario establishes two
distinct economic blocs. All financial and economic
activity stops between East and West, and the
Neutrals are compelled to choose the side of their
largest trading partner. The output losses are highest
for Neutrals, who are forced to limited economic
exchange to counterparts within a single bloc. In the
short run, total global output losses reach 5.5% of
global GDP , approximately twice as much as during
the COVID-19 pandemic, with global inflation rising
by 5.2%. For the Eastern bloc, the impact would be
deflationary, as weaker demand translates to easing
price pressures. The long-term impact on output
remains significant at 4.2%.
FIGURE 8 Short-run impact of geoeconomic fragmentation on global inflation
0.6%2.3%3.5%5.2%
0%1%2%3%4%5%6%Marginal impact on global inflation (deviation from the baseline in %)
Scenario 1
Low fragmentationScenario 3
High fragmentationScenario 2
Moderate fragmentationScenario 4
Very high fragmentation
Source: NERA analysis based on multi-country, multisector model of Baqaee & Farhi (2024).36 Data from 2013 World Input–Output Database and Asian
Development Bank’s 2023 Input–Output Tables. Short-run impact is defined as the impact measured one year after the shocks and is based on applying the
1-year to 10-year trade elasticity ratio found in Boehm et al. (2023)37 to the elasticities in Baqaee & Farhi (2024), as in Bolhuis et al. (2023)38
These four scenarios provide estimates for
the macroeconomic impact of geoeconomic
fragmentation that may change based on different
variables, including the resilience of the global
financial system. The model serves as a proxy
for the different transmission channels, such as
regulatory divergence. The country-specific model forecasts for Brazil, China, India and the US show
the adjustment to fragmentation over a period of
five years. Higher fragmentation provides financial
system participants with greater incentives to locate
alternative sources of capital or shift to different
payment systems to reduce costs in the long term.
Navigating Global Financial System Fragmentation
19
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: