Open but Secure Europe%E2%80%99s Path to Strategic Interdependence 2025
Page 13 of 31 · WEF_Open_but_Secure_Europe%E2%80%99s_Path_to_Strategic_Interdependence_2025.pdf
and decarbonization, while avoiding a wasteful and
divisive free-for-all. The deal should, among other
things, establish special permits for ramping-up
green technology production facilities to expedite
their construction. These would enable companies
to grow much faster and, in the process, reduce
the costs of their products and make them more
competitive in the global marketplace. A similar
policy toolbox would allow Europe to speed up the
urgent process of modernizing and expanding its
energy grid infrastructure. Here, a thorough review
of regulation regarding land use and local energy
infrastructure development should help accelerate
the deployment of renewables.
The concentration of CRM extraction and
refining in one country poses a significant risk to
Europe. The EU’s CRM Act rightly aims to boost
domestic mining, refining and recycling, but the
bloc remains CRM-poor and will continue to rely
on imports. There are nonetheless several steps
it can take to secure access to CRMs for its
green industries. The EU should establish a CRM
reserve – inspired by the US Strategic Petroleum
Reserve – as a buffer against supply disruptions.
It could do so partly through joint EU-level
purchasing. The mechanism could be opened
to EU partners such as Switzerland, European
Free Trade Association (EFTA) countries and the
United Kingdom.
More importantly, the EU should strike new
partnerships with resource-rich countries. That
means overcoming the trust deficit in many
developing economies – a deficit that has grown in
light of Europe’s handling of COVID-19 vaccines, ongoing difficulties with development and climate
finance, perceived green neo-colonialism with
the EU Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) and
the anticipated impact of the Carbon Border
Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM). To achieve this,
the EU should revamp its Global Gateway initiative
to offer more than rebadged budgets and an overly
optimistic reliance on private finance. It should
help partner countries move up the value chain,
for example by investing in cobalt refining in the
Democratic Republic of the Congo. It should also
engage with emerging economies to help them
adapt to the EUDR and CBAM.
Some politicians suggest that Europe can seek
competitiveness and sovereignty through lowering
climate ambitions. That would be a dead end. The
European Green Deal is the continent’s greatest
asset, providing certainty for green businesses by
guaranteeing growing demand for their products. It
evokes China’s EV success, which owes much to
policies accelerating the switchover and thus driving
domestic demand. Delaying Europe’s 2035 phase-
out of internal combustion engines would have the
opposite effect, making it harder for automakers to
invest in EV production.
If Europe can avoid such pitfalls and pursue a
strategically interdependent green transition —
expanding domestic production wherever
possible and investing in secure, diversified
partnerships where not — it can find a balance
between openness and resilience that will serve
it well. In a nutshell, the EU has to rebalance the
triangle between sustainability, competitiveness
and security. The Green
Deal is Europe’s
greatest asset –
but the EU has
to rebalance the
triangle between
sustainability,
competitiveness
and security.
Summary of recommendations
–Go easy on tariffs. The energy transition must
be as affordable as possible if it is to command
widespread support.
–Instead of focusing on technologies already
dominated by other players, focus on those
where Europe can still win a commanding
position, such as battery technology.
–Use every available form of firepower to
stimulate green industry – smart subsidies,
a newly empowered EIB, an expanded
EU Innovation Fund and new tax deductions
for R&D. –Establish a CRM reserve as a buffer.
Source CRM imports through new country
partnerships that are facilitated by a revamped
Global Gateway initiative. Provide support for
local value-creation and assistance in adapting
to CBAM and EUDR.
–Both the EU and national governments
should fast-track permitting and conduct a
fundamental review of land use to expedite the
construction of green infrastructure.
Open but Secure: Europe’s Path to Strategic Interdependence
13
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: