PHSSR European Union Investing in Health 2025
Page 18 of 40 · WEF_PHSSR_European_Union_Investing_in_Health_2025.pdf
17 Investing in Health for a Competitive, Secure, and Resilient Europe: A Strategic Call to Action
The Partnership for Health System Sustainability and Resilience2.A PILLAR A: OBJECTIVE SETTING AND PRIORITISATION OF FUNDING FOR HEALTH
2.A.1 Adopt an aligned EU investment strategy for health to facilitate a cohesive and strategic
funding approach that supports the objectives of the European Health Union
Ensuring strategic and efficient allocation of the EU budget and the positive impact of its
investments in health is critical in today’s context of increasing socioeconomic pressures, rising
geopolitical tensions, and global competitiveness challenges.46 In parallel, substantial innovation
driven by a wave of new technologies offers the potential to enhance patient care and improve
health system resilience and outcomes. The COVID-19 pandemic was a pivotal global challenge
from which the European Union drew important lessons—most notably, the critical value of
coordinated action among Member States in the health sector. This experience also catalysed the
development of the EHU in 2020, marking a significant step towards more integrated and resilient
EU-level health governance.47 The EHU emphasises that joint action in health at the European level is
crucial to Europe’s collective wellbeing, strategic autonomy, and geopolitical stability.48 In the face of
unprecedented global political and economic challenges, the case for collective action is
increasingly compelling.
EU funding programmes available for investments into health systems are fragmented, with
responsibilities distributed across multiple European Commission Directorate-Generals. This
institutional dispersion contributes to limited cohesion, inconsistencies in implementation
methodologies, and a lack of coordination towards common end goals.49 Even within the health
domain, thematic overlaps pose challenges in ensuring synergies and complementarities across
financing mechanisms, preventing the maximisation of efficiency in available resources. For
instance, support for strengthening the resilience of national health systems is channelled through
various programmes including the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund
Plus, EU4Health, and the Digital Europe programme.50 While this multiplicity of funding streams has
the potential to expand the overall pool of resources available for health systems, it also generates
inefficiencies and redundancies. In reflecting on the limitations of the current EU budgetary
framework, the European Commission has underscored the need for the next MFF to be guided
more explicitly by policy priorities than by institutional structures. Enhancing synergies between
policy objectives and financing instruments will be essential to maximise impact and ensure
strategic coherence across EU health investments.51
Currently, EU priorities in health are defined collectively across multiple mechanisms, including the
European Pillar of Social Rights, the EHU, and the EBCP . The key priorities across these mechanisms
include ensuring equitable access to healthcare, strengthening health security, preventing NCDs,
implementing digital transformation of health systems, and tackling health workforce challenges
(see ‘Case study: Addressing the health workforce crisis’). While the EHU has set the foundations for
what the EU can achieve in health, a more defined and detailed strategy on health investments is
needed to ensure effective use of the EU budget to support the EU’s strategic health priorities. The
priority areas for coordinated action should be integrated within a broader EU strategy that can
guide more cohesive and efficient investments to deliver the EU objectives in health.
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: