Quantum Technologies Key Strategies and Opportunities for ICT Leaders 2025
Page 20 of 26 · WEF_Quantum_Technologies_Key_Strategies_and_Opportunities_for_ICT_Leaders_2025.pdf
Appendices
A1 Explanation of indicators
These indicators also influence one another, with risk being
particularly affected by the combined impact of all other factors.
Indicator explanations TABLE 1
IndicatorExplanation of
indicator levelsQuantum
computingQuantum
sensingQuantum
communications
and security
Maturity
How developed and
ready the technology
is for practical use1 (very low) – Experimental stage,
mainly theoretical, no real-world use
cases
3 (moderate) – Some proven
applications, but large-scale
deployment is limited
5 (high) – Well-developed,
widely adopted and integrated
into various industriesBetween very low
and moderate
Early-stage technology
with promising but
limited practical
applicationsModerate
Some technologies
(atomic clocks,
magnetometers) are
mature, but scalability
is an issueModerate
Technologies like
quantum key distribution
(QKD) and post-
quantum cryptography
(PQC) are mostly in use,
but widespread adoption
is still evolving
Learning curve
The effort and
expertise required
to adopt and use
the technology1 (very low) – Very complex,
requiring deep expertise in quantum
physics and engineering
3 (moderate) – Specialized
knowledge required, but practical
applications are more intuitive
5 (high) – Easy to learn and
integrate, with user-friendly tools
and widespread training availableBetween moderate
and high
Requires deep quantum
mechanics knowledge,
but programming tools
like Qiskit are emergingModerate
Moderate complexity;
applied fields like
medical imaging and
navigation are easier
to understandBetween moderate
and high
Complex field requiring
knowledge of quantum
cryptography,
entanglement and
network security
Implementation time
and cost
The resources
required to deploy
the technology1 (very low) – Expensive,
ong-term investment with
slow deployment
3 (moderate) – Moderate cost
and time commitment, with potential
long-term return on investment (ROI)
5 (high) – Cost-effective and
quick to implement at scaleBetween very low
and moderate
Expensive and long-term
investment required, with
gradual improvementsModerate
Some sensors are
deployable now, but
widespread use is costlyModerate
High initial costs for
infrastructure but
improving with industry
investments
Scalability
The ability of the
technology to expand
and handle increasing
workloads1 (very low) – Limited scalability due
to hardware, cost or environmental
requirements
3 (moderate) – Some expansion
possible, but significant
improvements are needed
5 (high) – Easily scalable,
deployable across industries
with minimal barriersBetween very low
and moderate
Requires massive
infrastructure
(cryogenics, vacuum
systems), making
scaling difficultBetween very low
and moderate
Some sensors can
be miniaturized, but
others need complex
environmentsBetween very low
and moderate
Infrastructure-heavy
(fibre optics, satellites)
and has distance
limitations
Risks
Potential challenges
or negative outcomes
from adoption or
non-adoption1 (very low) – Minimal risk,
well-established technology
with clear benefits
3 (moderate) – Some uncertainties,
but risks can be managed with
strategic planning
5 (high) – Significant risks, including
high costs, security vulnerabilities or
potential disruptionsBetween moderate
and high
High costs, uncertain
timelines and future risk
to encryptionModerate
Integration challenges
and high initial costs but
moderate long-term riskBetween moderate
and high
Risk of delayed adoption
leading to cybersecurity
vulnerabilities
Quantum Technologies: Key Strategies and Opportunities for ICT Leaders
20
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: