Redefining Value From Outcome Based Funding to Tradeable Impact 2025

Page 18 of 32 · WEF_Redefining_Value_From_Outcome_Based_Funding_to_Tradeable_Impact_2025.pdf

Phase 1: Emergence The first phase would involve the introduction of ICs as an official currency alongside traditional fiat currencies. Governments and international institutions would then launch pilot programmes where individuals and organizations earn ICs by engaging in socially beneficial activities like environmental restoration, education or healthcare services. ICs would be issued as loans to accredited impact organizations – non-governmental organizations (NGOs), social enterprises, etc. – who, in turn, would pay for staff, services and products with ICs. Impact loans could be repaid through verified impact (“proof of impact”) or through ICs bought on the currency market. ICs would expire after a certain amount of time, unless reactivated through further verified impact. These initiatives would begin at local and regional levels, where ICs could be used to purchase goods and services from participating businesses that support sustainability and social responsibility. Governments could incentivize adoption by allowing partial tax credits, public service access or benefits in exchange for IC holdings. Corporations could start integrating it into their sustainability strategies, enabling consumers to redeem ICs for products and services. Phase 2: Expansion As adoption grows, ICs would gain legitimacy as an alternative economic mechanism, expanding beyond local pilot projects to become a globally recognized complementary currency. Key global institutions such as the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the World Bank would endorse IC use, facilitating the standardization of social value measurements and transaction mechanisms. Governments would formalize IC use, enabling ICs to play a role in public infrastructure development, social welfare programmes and international trade agreements.At this stage, ICs would become widely accepted across industries prioritizing sustainability and social impact – including renewable energy, healthcare, education and circular economy businesses. A secondary market would emerge in which IC can be traded for fiat currency and other assets, allowing value creation beyond its original closed-loop economy. To maintain financial stability, central banks could introduce monetary control mechanisms, ensuring that the supply of ICs remains limited and, as much as possible, tied to measurable social impact outcomes, preventing inflation and speculative misuse. Phase 3: Integration In due course, ICs would be fully integrated into the global financial system, operating alongside traditional fiat currencies as a core economic component. National economies would begin incorporating ICs in GDP calculations, recognizing that social and environmental contributions are fundamental to economic resilience. Governments and financial institutions would use ICs to collateralize loans, insurance policies and investment funds, further strengthening their role in mainstream financial markets. Central banks would start to act as the buyer-of-last-resort for ICs, effectively establishing a long-term floor price for such credits. Major international trade agreements might then adopt ICs as a settlement mechanism for sustainable trade policies, carbon offset markets and cross-border social investments. This would allow developing nations to generate economic growth by contributing to global sustainability or development goals rather than relying solely on traditional exports or foreign aid. With blockchain and AI ensuring full transparency in issuance and transactions, ICs would operate within a decentralized, trust-based framework, allowing local and global stakeholders to participate in decision-making and impact verification via DAOs. Opportunities and challenges of impact currency FIGURE 5 Risk of politicization Complexity makes it hard to access for users/citizens Risk of inflation or volatility (mitigated through time-bound retirement of ICs) Technical and trust barriers to convertibilityPositions social value as monetary value Enables systemic resource redistribution Creates inclusive economic participation Provides a monetary policy tool without impacting fiscal policyOpportunities Challenges To maintain financial stability, central banks could introduce monetary control mechanisms, ensuring that the supply of ICs remains limited. Redefining Value: From Outcome-Based Funding to Tradeable Impact 18
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: