State of Nature and Climate 2025
Page 2 of 5 · WEF_State_of_Nature_and_Climate_2025.pdf
–Carbon stored in nature is vulnerable to
a changing climate.
The ability of nature on land to sequester carbon shows
vulnerability to changing climate conditions, particularly
in the face of intensifying drought and fire activity.
Historically, nature on land has absorbed around a quarter
of anthropogenic emissions, and thus buffered the warming
effects of fossil-fuel burning. If this function weakens, more
and more carbon will end up in the atmosphere, driving
further climate change.
–Ocean heat uptake is at an all‑time high.
Ocean heat uptake is higher than at any time in recorded
history, driving sea level rise, ocean heat waves and coral
bleaching. The Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) – an ocean circulation pattern responsible for
regulating climate and the ocean carbon cycle – is showing
signs of slowing down, and the most recent science shows
a collapse this century cannot be excluded, threatening
catastrophic global consequences.
Corporate Health Check
Key Findings
Only 10% of corporates demonstrate tangible action to address
the climate and nature emergency and only 1% are performing
at the highest assessed level - Level 4. The companies analysed
under the CDP Corporate Health Check represent 67% of global
market capitalization. These companies are assessed on 4 levels.
Table 1 Corporates are assessed at four levels, with the following criteria :
Laggards – 90% Frontrunners – 10%
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
–No or limited emissions-
related disclosure or
targets
–Poor governance
–No integration of climate
into business strategy
–No impact reductions –Disclosure of Scope 1 and
2 emissions
–Company-wide emissions
target across any scope
–Board oversight and risk
assessment on climate
–Some positive progress on
climate targets –Disclosure of full value
chain emissions (Scope
1, 2, 3)
–Disclosures on at least 1
material nature topic
–Any emissions reduction
target covering Scope 1-3
(not SBTi-approved or a
net zero target)
–Stronger environmental
governance mechanisms
–Integration of climate and
nature into strategy
–On track to reach targets –Disclosure of full value
chain emissions (Scope
1, 2, 3)
–Disclosures on majority
material nature topics
–Net-zero or SBTi-
approved climate targets
–Robust environmental
governance
–Integration of climate
and nature into strategy,
including aligning
investment with transition
plan
–On track to reach targets
Of the companies making the most progress against their targets,
there are four key levers:
1. Having a 1.5°C-aligned climate transition plan
2. Placing a price on carbon
3. Linking executive pay to environmental targets
4. Engagement across the value chainGlobally, only 35% of the companies are on track to meet their
targets. Regionally, Europe leads with 46% of companies on
track to meet their own targets. North America comes next with
33%, followed by Asia (32%), Latin America and Oceania (27%),
and Africa (25%). Among companies that are on track with their
emissions targets, they have cut their average emissions by 2% per
year since 2016, bucking the wider trend of rising global emissions.
65% 68%
54%67%75% 74% 74%35% 32%
46%33%25% 26% 26%
0%20%40%60%80%100%
Total Asia
(including Middle East)Europe North America Africa Oceania Latin America
Companies not on track with emissions targets Companies on track with emissions targetsFigure 2 Regions on track to reach their climate targets
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: