The Cost of Inaction 2024
Page 31 of 58 · WEF_The_Cost_of_Inaction_2024.pdf
Many companies already realize these benefits
A number of sustainability leaders across a variety
of sectors are able to find cost-efficient mitigation
investments and report median benefit-to-cost
ratios (BCRs) of 1x to 10x (see Figure 18). Moreover,
25% of respondents to a recent BCGxCO2 AI
survey reported material decarbonization benefits.49
These include tangible improvements such as lower
operating costs (cited by 44% of respondents) and
increased revenues (37%), along with intangible
advantages such as reputational gain (46%) and
enhanced supply chain resilience (42%).
Companies often focus too much on short-
term risks, potentially neglecting longer-term
transition challenges
In fact, approximately 80% of companies reporting
transition risks to CDP only disclose short-term
implications. This short-term view may prevent
fossil-dependent business models from fully
questioning the long-term sustainability of their
portfolios. By overlooking how market shifts and
evolving regulations could impact future revenue streams, these companies risk underestimating
the financial consequences of transition risks
and missing the economic value in making
bolder, forward-looking adjustments. Additionally,
companies must account for the broader socio-
economic costs of an imbalanced transition, which
extend far beyond immediate financial losses from
regulatory and technological changes.50
Years ago, we moved to seize the
opportunity to work with our high carbon-
emitting clients on their sustainable
transition, swiftly shifting our mix of
traditional fossil fuels activity towards
sustainable finance-related business,
especially in renewables. The transition
has been profitable, and we are on track
to generate $1 billion annually in income
from sustainable finance.
Bill Winters, Group Chief Executive,
Standard Chartered Bank
The Cost of Inaction: A CEO Guide to Navigating Climate Risk
31
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: