The Cost of Inaction 2024
Page 40 of 58 · WEF_The_Cost_of_Inaction_2024.pdf
Using a scenario-based framework, a major
construction player found that one of its most
significant risks was the potential high cost and
low availability of green construction materials.
The company assessed its exposure towards risk
by translating it into measurable metrics under
different transition scenarios.
One identified risk was high cost/low availability
of green construction materials. The company
measured its vulnerability to these risks by
using related CO2e emissions as a proxy. For
the green materials risk, this was tied to Scope
3 value chain emissions abated through green
materials adoption. The company then derived synthetic risk scores based on the exposure and
vulnerability assessments in order to compare
risks. It found that the cost and availability of
green construction materials was among the most
material risks.
Finally, the company estimated the economic
impact of the most significant risks in order
to assess the magnitude of transition risks
and projected that the higher cost and lower
availability of green construction materials
could reduce EBITDA by about 1.5% by 2030,
considering all known transition factors.
Source: BCG.CASE STUDY 3
Quantification of transition risks in the construction supply chain
Identify climate-related
opportunities
By thoroughly assessing and efficiently managing
climate risks, companies can position themselves
for opportunities in both severe warming and faster
transition scenarios.
Climate risks reveal opportunities to
create more efficient, resilient and cost-
effective properties. By addressing those,
we aim to enhance the value and usability
of buildings.
Guy Grainger, Global Head of Sustainability
& ESG Services, JLLImproving internal operations, through increased
resilience, resource efficiency and an optimized
energy mix, can set a company apart from its peers.
Navigating the transition skilfully builds muscle
for offering new green products and services
and expanding into new markets.
On top of transition finance to support
the decarbonization of our clients,
adaptation financing represents a
cost-saving and revenue-increase
potential. Insuring against physical
risks also presents a significant
business opportunity.
Javier Rodríguez Soler,
Global Head of Sustainability and Corporate
& Investment Banking, BBVAWe are working to quantify transition risks using scenarios
including those of IEA and NGFS to understand the impact of
carbon pricing and regulatory changes on our operations. We
recognize that transformation risks and opportunities will have
significant impacts, including on our clean ammonia strategy.
Bernhard Stormyr, Vice President, Sustainability Governance,
Yara InternationalAs with physical risks, transition risks are best
identified using scenario-based analysis. One
source of scenarios is the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS),61 which regularly updates
its analysis of how climate policy and technology
trends could shape these risks in different futures.Evaluate transition risks
The Cost of Inaction: A CEO Guide to Navigating Climate Risk
40
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: