The Strategic Role of Telecom Providers Across the AI Value Chain 2026
Page 25 of 31 · WEF_The_Strategic_Role_of_Telecom_Providers_Across_the_AI_Value_Chain_2026.pdf
–Cost: ❸
Retrofitting for power and cooling drives
moderate investment
–Complexity: ❸
Requires facility engineering but follows
predictable processes
–Value rationale: Attractive in AI-intensive
regions but not transformational in most markets
NaaS
–Revenue: ❸
Programmable connectivity and APIs provide
new enterprise revenue, though demand remains
early-stage
–Operational efficiency: ❹
Automation reduces bespoke engineering and
simplifies enterprise provisioning
–Cost: ❸
Requires automation, slicing and operations
support system (OSS)/business support systems
(BSS) integration
–Complexity: ❸
Moderate technical and operational
transformation required
–Value rationale: Emerging monetization upside
but not yet proven at scale in most markets
Horizontal and vertical
AI solutions
–Revenue: ❺
Vertical AI represents one of the largest
adjacency revenue pools for telcos
–Customer satisfaction: ❹
Industry-aligned solutions deliver measurable
operational outcomes
–Cost: ❸
Requires investment in productization and
domain expertise
–Complexity: ❷
High due to vertical integration and regulated
customer environments
–Value rationale: Major long-term growth
adjacency with multi-industry relevance
GPUaaS
–Revenue: ❶
Strong demand, but hyperscaler competition
limits upside in non-sovereign markets –Customer satisfaction: ❸
Local compute reduces latency and simplifies
enterprise procurement
–Cost: ❶
GPUs, cooling and infrastructure orchestration
make this extremely capital-intensive
–Complexity: ❷
Requires integration with AI workflows,
orchestration and SLAs
–Value rationale: Demand is evident, but
telcos’ competitive position is weak, limiting
revenue
B2C AI aggregator
–Revenue: ❷
Average revenue per user (ARPU) uplift limited to
bundles and churn-reduction effects
–Customer satisfaction: ❹
AI assistants and personalization improve
perceived service quality
–Cost: ❺
Low-cost, software-driven offering with minimal
infrastructure needs
–Complexity: ❹
Moderate integrations but overall low
implementation complexity
–Value rationale: Enhances experience but
offers limited commercial upside in consumer
markets
Sovereign AI infrastructure
–Revenue: ❺
National AI programmes and sovereign AI
factories offer multi-year, high-value contracts
–Customer satisfaction: ❹
Supports mandatory compliance for regulated
and public-sector workloads
–Cost: ❶
Highest capital burden due to data centres,
power systems and graphics processing unit
(GPU) clusters
–Complexity: ❶
Requires heavy regulatory alignment, multi-year
builds and ecosystem coordination
–Value rationale: One of the strongest
long-term revenue pools where national
investment exists
The Strategic Role of Telecom Providers across the AI Value Chain
25
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: