Water Futures Mobilizing Multi Stakeholder Action for Resilience 2025
Page 18 of 50 · WEF_Water_Futures_Mobilizing_Multi_Stakeholder_Action_for_Resilience_2025.pdf
Where to start
Multi-stakeholder collaboration
Build international consistency in collecting, sharing
and using economic, environmental and social data
through globally recognized methods to value and
cost water cycles accurately. To value the full cost
of water appropriately requires data on different
aspects of water:
–Economic (e.g. real-time pricing, extraction,
treatment, distribution, provisioning costs).
–Environmental (e.g. ecosystem services
valuation, biodiversity impacts).
–Social (e.g. accessibility, equity, public health).
–Given the interconnectedness of water use,
data-gathering efforts require coordination
among stakeholders.
Articulate a globally relevant framework, with clear
links to nature and climate agendas as well as
economics. Water is often perceived as abundant
and inexpensive. The international community must
build globally recognized frameworks to articulate
the economic and societal value of water and
help explain their relevance to nature and climate
agendas. Initiatives such as the Valuing Water
Initiative62 and Ceres63 are already building the tools
to support these efforts.
Mobilize multiple stakeholders, including
international organizations, regulators, water
suppliers and communities, among others, to
pilot and scale-up the use of tools and methods.
Mainstreaming of approaches can be accelerated
by building consistency across multi-stakeholder platforms that guide water pricing at different
levels. Good principles for pricing water can be
developed at a global level, but their application to
local settings needs to be context-specific. Pricing
must therefore integrate critical stakeholders such
as farmer organizations and irrigation districts,
industry and manufacturers, as well as water utilities
and local governments.
Private sector lead
Quantify the value of water and risk at the
corporate level and across the supply chain.
Doing this can help build the business case for
action versus inaction. It can reinforce the case
for increasing water resilience and encourage
the deployment of measures to enhance the
prevention of and response to water-related
shocks and stresses across supply chains (e.g.
droughts and floods), which have been identified
by corporations as key drivers of negative water-
related business impacts.64
Accelerate data collection to establish the true
cost of water for a company. This should account
for future trends around water supply and demand.
Companies can take steps to collect water internally
and along their value chains to understand how
valuable water is to their business. Existing tools,
such as the World Business Council for Sustainable
Development’s (WBCSD) guide65 outlining water
valuation techniques for business applications,66 and
Veolia’s “True Cost of Water” tool which monetizes
“blue risks”, provide a step in this direction.67
Set internal water pricing to inform decision-
making. Companies can quantify the monetary
value of water to business, reflecting factors
such as the benefits of improving water quality,
efficiency and securing water supplies68 and the
risks of inaction.
Pricing of
water must
integrate critical
stakeholders
such as farmer
organizations and
irrigation districts,
industry and
manufacturers,
as well as water
utilities and local
governments.
18
Water Futures: Mobilizing Multi-Stakeholder Action for Resilience
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: