Womens Health Investment Outlook 2026
Page 32 of 47 · WEF_Womens_Health_Investment_Outlook_2026.pdf
Leverage partnerships to mobilize capital
Stakeholders: Investors, philanthropy and
development funders, public funders, industry,
researchers, healthcare systems
Many promising women’s health innovations
struggle to attract the capital needed to reach scale.
Research and programmes targeting conditions
such as endometriosis and PCOS require
substantial funding to reach proof of concept, yet
early translational uncertainty and long timelines
often deter traditional venture investors, while public
and philanthropic funding rarely extends far enough
to de-risk assets for institutional capital, creating a
translational “valley of death” between early-stage
research and commercial investment.
Partnerships that combine public, private and
philanthropic resources can use blended finance –
such as pooled investment vehicles, innovation
studios or matching mechanisms that link
philanthropic or public grants to private funding once
milestones are met – to bridge this valley, expand
the investable pipeline and attract diverse funders.As innovations progress towards commercialization,
co-financing with health systems, payers or industry
partners can accelerate validation, reimbursement
and distribution. Partnerships with corporate
strategics or technology platforms can also provide
growth capital.
Proof point: In the US, the NIH and the Foundation
for the NIH partnered with leading biopharma
companies and philanthropies to launch the
Accelerating Medicines Partnership (AMP) for high-
burden diseases such as Alzheimer’s, lupus and
type 2 diabetes.109 By establishing shared, publicly
accessible data and analysis platforms that enabled
biomarker discovery and validation, AMP de-risked
early-stage therapeutic targets and made them
more attractive for industry investment.110 Industry
re-engaged at scale. The Alzheimer’s therapeutics
market now exceeds $5 billion annually,111
demonstrating how blended, pre-competitive
funding converts high-risk discovery into investable,
commercially scalable markets.2
Modernize regulatory and clinical end-points
Stakeholders: Researchers, innovators,
regulators, industry
Many women’s health conditions, such as
endometriosis, PCOS and menopause, lack
standardized, validated end-points. This
complicates trial design, lengthens study timelines
and increases uncertainty in regulatory review,
which then heightens investment risk. Establishing
sex-specific and disease-relevant end-points offers
the potential to improve trial design and strengthen
predictability for investors. It is important to add
the caveat that, without rigorous validation and
consistent application, surrogate end-points can
also introduce new risks – undermining payer
confidence, clinical adoption and long-term market
sustainability. Striking the right balance between
accelerating innovation and maintaining robust
safety and efficacy standards is therefore essential.
When developed within clear guardrails, stronger, well-validated end-points can enhance confidence
throughout the ecosystem, reducing risk, improving
transparency and supporting innovation that
delivers both clinical and financial impact.
Proof point: In osteoporosis, acceptance of bone
mineral density as a surrogate end-point for fracture
risk reduced reliance on long-term outcomes
and enabled faster and less costly approvals.112
Similarly, in rare diseases, agencies such as the
US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and
European Medicines Agency (EMA) created
tailored frameworks with surrogate end-points to
accelerate approvals, which dramatically increased
innovation and capital flows even in small patient
populations.113 In the first quarter of 2024 alone,
rare-disease pharmaceutical companies raised $7.1
billion in public equity and debt financing, up 307%
from the same quarter in 2023,114 demonstrating
investor confidence in the market.3
Expand reimbursement to create predictable revenue models
Stakeholders: Policy-makers, payers, providers,
innovators
Innovation scales when reimbursement is clear and
consistent. Today, many women’s health solutions
operate in a patchwork reimbursement landscape,
creating uncertainty around revenue streams,
slowing business growth and limiting the ability of
investors to accurately forecast risk or returns. Expanding reimbursement to cover evidence-
based interventions, including preventive and
digital tools, could reduce downstream costs
while improving quality of life. In some cases, this
will require updating standards of care to reflect
emerging science; and in all cases, ensuring that
reimbursement keeps pace. For innovators, clear
reimbursement pathways not only drive adoption,
they also determine valuation. Pricing power 4
Women’s Health Investment Outlook
32
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: