Workforce Health Across the Value Chain 2025
Page 5 of 40 · WEF_Workforce_Health_Across_the_Value_Chain_2025.pdf
Introduction
This report is the product of a year-long research
collaboration between Mercer and the World
Economic Forum’s Healthy Workforces initiative.
To better understand how both climate-related
risks and systemic gaps in access to healthcare
affect supply-chain resilience, the research team
conducted in-depth, semi-structured interviews with
nearly 60 experts across industry, policy, finance
and civil society.
Participants reflected a deliberately balanced mix of
perspectives, with the majority (just over half) drawn
from private-sector enterprises and multinational
corporations. These were complemented by voices
from civil society, labour organizations and non-
profit organizations, intergovernmental bodies,
government agencies and academia – capturing
both headquarters-level strategic insight and the
grounded experience of those implementing policy,
programmes and advocacy in diverse local contexts.
These conversations – totalling more than 60 hours –
were transcribed, thematically coded and triangulated
with supporting literature to reveal patterns in
how leaders are navigating these interdependent
challenges. Further details on the methodology and
participant profiles can be found in the Appendix.
Across the interviews, certain consistent themes
emerged. There was broad consensus across
79% of interviewees that supply-chain labour
health and safety gaps were a source of business
disruption and reputational risk. One-third of
participants spoke about the “orphaned” nature of
understanding supply-chain labour, remarking that
it is often isolated within risk or compliance teams
rather than considered a core business concern.
At the same time, participants held nuanced and at
times divergent views on how progress should be
driven. Some emphasized regulation as essential for
setting baselines and enabling long-term planning.
One-third pointed to its role in levelling the playing
field and inspiring strategy shifts – especially when
backed by meaningful enforcement. But others
voiced scepticism: 62.5% cited the complexity,
fragmentation and compliance burden of current
frameworks as obstacles to action. A smaller
subset described poorly enforced mandates as
counterproductive or symbolic.
A second area of divergence emerged around
private-sector responsibility. Nearly 90% of
interviewees addressed the need for corporate leadership in workforce health and resilience – most
viewing proactive investment as a competitive
advantage. But barriers remain. Roughly a third
cited short-termism and the challenge of quantifying
return on investment. Nearly a quarter pointed
to internal silos, limited visibility beyond Tier 1
suppliers and lack of coordination with public
institutions as persistent constraints.4
The report structure reflects these complexities
and builds on prior work at the Forum, including
the Climate and Health Initiative,5 a publication on
the role of insurers in navigating extreme heat,6
and a report on the economic cost of climate-
health affects developed in collaboration with Oliver
Wyman.7 The following sections trace the arc from
shared recognition of health as a business asset
through growing awareness of climate-related
labour risks to emerging models of investment
and collaboration:
–Section 1 examines how organizations
increasingly view worker health and well-being
as a business asset – but protections often stop
at direct employees.
–Section 2 explores how climate volatility
exacerbates health risks and exposes blind
spots in labour protection and health systems
capacity, particularly in vulnerable geographies.
–Section 3 focuses on governance, emphasizing
that alignment, accountability and internal clarity
are essential to move from awareness to action.
–Section 4 highlights promising models – from
parametric insurance to co-financing – that
strengthen labour resilience alongside societal
health and well-being through proactive
investment.
–Section 5 looks beyond individual firms,
spotlighting how collaboration with communities
and across industries drives more durable and
equitable supply-chain resilience.
Taken together, these insights reflect a growing
recognition: resilience strategies that overlook labour
health are incomplete. But attention alone is not
enough. This report surfaces the testimony of leaders
grappling with these converging pressures – offering
grounded, practical insights on where the conversation,
and investment, is going next.Worker health is critical to supply-
chain strategy. Leaders report growing
momentum – and protection gaps.
Workforce Health Across the Value Chain: Organizational Insights to Mitigate Risk and Create Sustainable Growth
5
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: