Transportation System Plan 2018-2038

Table F-1 Continued Summary of Draft 2004-2007 STIP Programmed Improvements – City of Medford Key No. Route Location Fiscal Year Const. Cost ($,000) Work Type Description 10964 I-5 OTIA – South Medford Interchange (MP 27.20 – 8.30) 2006 $39,056 Modernization Relocate and construct new interchange, partnering with City of Medford 12332 Merriman Rd. & Table Rock Rd. 2004 $305 Operations Upgrade intersection 12333 4th & Oakdale 2004 $150 Operations Install new traffic signal 12334 Sunrise Avenue & Jackson Street 2005 $150 Operations Install new traffic signal 11784 Various Highways RVTD 2005 $131 Oper ations TDM Rideshare Projects 12531 Various Highways RVTD 2006 $146 Oper ations TDM Rideshare Projects 11532 Various Highways RVTD 2007 $146 Oper ations TDM Rideshare Projects 11715 OR 99 Stewart Avenue – 6th Street 2004 $2,056 Pavement Preservation Grind and inlay/overlay pavement Source: Draft Statew ide T ransporta tion Improvement Program , 2004-2009, ODOT The STIP is not a planning docum ent; it is a project prioritization and sche duling docum ent developed through various planning processes involving local and regional governm ents, transportation agencies, and the interested public. Through the STIP, ODOT allo cates resources to those projects that have been given the highest priority in these plans. Oregon Transportation Investment Act (OTIA) Projects In 2000, Oregon voters approved a $400 m illion bond m easure for a set of specific state highway improvem ents. In Medford, the final OTIA project list includes a $14 m illion com mitment toward relocating the South Medford Interchange on I-5 furthe r south and constructing ne w arterial connections. The total project cost is $51.7 m illion. The I-5 Nort h Medford Interchange is also on the State’s list of planned im provem ents, and is in the predesign stage. Regional Transportation Plan Highw ay and Roadw ay Improvements Tables F-2 through F-4 list com bined City and C ounty planned roadway improvem ents within the Medford Urban Growth Boundary . These im provem ents have been stratified by the expected tim e fram e for im plem entation including: short-term (2001-2005) in Table F-2, m edium -term (2006-2010) in Table F-3, and long-term (2011-2023) in Table F-4. The tables also include cost estim ates for each project and identify the agencies with prim ary and secondary funding responsibility . Cost estim ates are totaled for each im plem entation phase and com pared with the tota l expected available revenue for that phase. Improvem ents listed in the tables are lim ited to those in the RVCOG Tier 1 sy stem , which is the financially constrained network. F-2