UNCLASSIFIED/MOM
UNCLASSIFIED/MOM
01/26/2024
New York, NY
, having been duly sworn by Supervisory
Special Agent (SSA)
following statement to
01/26/2024, and
and and and ., hereby make the
on
on 08/08/2024,
on 10/07/2024, whom I know
to be SSAs of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
assigned to the Inspection Division (INSD) at the time of my
statement. My attorney, Richard J. Roberson, Jr., was present
during my statement all occasions, via telephone. This statement
took place over a three-day period. The statement initiated on
01/26/2024, and again on 08/08/2024, after additional
allegations were added:
I entered on duty (EOD) on 02/21/2006, as an Intelligence
Analyst (IA). I EOD on 10/08/2008, as a Special Agent (SA) and I
am currently assigned to the New York Field Office (NYFO) in
that capacity.
I understand that this is an internal investigation
regarding an allegation that Special Agent
improperly stored digital evidence at his residence in violation
of 1.6- Investigative Deficiency- Improper Handling of Property
in the Care, Custody, or Control of the Government. On
10/30/2023 the following expanded allegations were added:
Special Agent improperly handled, documented,
and stored digital evidence and failed to secure CSAM within
policy, resulting in a cyber intrusion in violation of 1.6-
Investigative Deficiency- Improper Handling of Property in the
Page 1 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173373
UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO
(94 Care, Custody, or Control of the Government and 5.17- Security
Violation- Failure to Secure sensitive Equipment/ Materials. On
02/07/2024 the following expanded allegations were added:
Special Agent exceeded the limits of his
authority by contracting an outside company to develop computer
software on behalf of the FBI in violation of 2.6 Misuse of
Position and 5.23 Violation of Miscellaneous Rules/Regulations.
I have been further advised of my rights and
responsibilities in connection with this inquiry as set forth on
a "Warning and Assurance to Employee Required to Provide
Information" form FD-645 which I have read and signed. I
understand from my review of the FD-645 that should I refuse to
answer or fail to reply fully and truthfully during this
interview, I can expect to be dismissed from the rolls of the 01/26/2024
New York, NY
FBI.
I have been advised by INSD not to provide the details of a
whistleblower complaint I have filed with the Department of
Justice in which I assert that these allegations are some of
many retaliatory actions taken against me by the FBI that stem
from a 2023 cyber intrusion of the NYFO's child exploitation
forensic lab. While I will not go into details, I believe this
is important to mention here given the very genesis of these
allegations were derived from a directive to make me a scapegoat
for the intrusion. I am happy to elaborate if requested, but in
sum I was retaliated against for my having made numerous
protected disclosures over the years that went unaddressed,l0
Page 2 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173374
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
01/26/2024
New York, NY
8 which likely would have prevented the intrusion from happening.
When the intrusion occurred, these disclosures, which I made
again, caused FBI Executive Management (EM) to fear
repercussions of their own failure to address the issues I
presented before an incident like the intrusion could occur. I
have proof upon proof that I was then targeted by FBI management
as an attempt to make it appear that I and my squad mates were
responsible. I know that INSD is in possession of the first of
my submitted whistleblower complaints, but there are several
other amendments as well as supporting documents that I can
provide upon request.
I am currently assigned to CT-25, a Domestic Terrorism
squad, but assigned to an Enterprise Investigation that is a
hybrid of Domestic Terrorism and Child Exploitation squad. I was
assigned to squad CY-3 in May 2010 and officially named on the
squad in July 2010. This was when the FBI's child exploitation
program was referred to as "Innocent Images" and fell under the
Cyber Division, while Squad. C-20 was the Human Trafficking (HT)
squad at the time. I believe it was 2015 when Violent Crimes
Against Children (VCAC) and HT programs were combined under the
FBI's Criminal Division, which led to the merger of the
violations in the NYFO under squad C-20. The squad is split and
has the HT side and the VCAC side, and I was a VCAC Agent.
Agents primarily work their assigned viol tions, but we come
Q91)together as a squad for operations.
Page 3 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//F0130
EFTA00173375
UNCLASSIFIED//FOOD
01/26/2024
0 New York, NY
I have been with the FBI for over 18 years, having spent
the last 16 years as an Agent. I have been one of the FBI's
leading Agents in Child Exploitation investigations and to this
day, I believe that I am one of, if not the only, Court -
certified expert witness for the entire FBI for child
exploitation. I have personally accounted for over 60 arrests,
150 search warrants, and have been responsible for rescuing
several hundreds of children. As is elaborated on in my
Curriculum Vitae, which I have provided to INSD and has been
introduced to certify me in Court as an expert witness, I also
have received numerous awards and accolades, including but not
limited to being a two-time recipient of the FBI's Medal of
Excellence and the Southern District of New York's (SDNY)
prestigious McCabe Award. I have an incredible reputation around
the FBI and am seen as one of the hardest working and driven
Agents in the FBI. In demonstrating the support I received,
after the intrusion when FBI Headquarters (HQ) had begun its
efforts to retaliate against me, the NYFO went to great lengths
to push-back. Now retired Assistant Director in Charge (ADIC)
defied orders from Assistant Directors (AD) and
the Deputy Director (DD) to have me punished. This defiance led
the DD to order charges against me, and months later I received
the first of the referenced charges. The NYFO however still
showered me with their support, with singing my
Page 4 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173376
UNCLASSIFIED//FOOD
e:yraises to
one " 01/26/2024
New York, NY
, stating that he would rather have
than 10 other Agents. The NYFO also nominating
me for the second of the FBI Medal of Excellence awards I would
receive in December 2023. Just months ago, in 2024, I was
nominated for, but did not receive, the Director's Award,
however at the same time I was nominated for an award from the
Federal Law Enforcement Foundation and on 10/22/2024, I was
informed I am receiving it.
I can expand at length on the accolades and praise I have
received from Agents, Analysts, management, HQ, Assistant United
States Attorney's (AUSA's), local law enforcement, and more over
the years. Even despite my current situation I continue to
receive praise and support from all ranks and from AUSAs. Last
month, in September 2024, the SDNY Project Safe-Childhood
Coordinator (PSC) requested I assist her in providing child
exploitation training to SDNY AUSAs. The PSC is aware I am no
longer on the child exploitation squad, and finds the actions
taken against me to be disgraceful. She also stated that despite
it all, she considers me to be the best in the FBI.
Regarding the allegations against me, it is my
understanding that they stem, in whole or in part, from
interviews conducted by the FBI's INSD in March 2023.
Specifically, the statements I made during those interviews ..,•)
Page 5 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173377
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
01/26/2024
New York, NY
ppear to have been the basis for the observations outlined in
the subsequent INSD report, which the FBI has reported to be the
foundation of these charges. I have since learned that this
report was authored by someone two or three levels removed from
me, relying on secondhand interpretations of my statements from
the notes of the interviewers. I know what I said during the
interviews, and the references in the INSD report do not
accurately reflect my actual words.
The INSD initially published a draft report around May or
June 2023, which included observations closely mirroring the
allegations against me. Both I and the NYFO leadership,
including my
observations
inaccuracies former ADIC,
as we believed
were discussed countered these
them to be inaccurate. These
in detail during meetings with
and FBI EM, and we later submitted a formal written
rebuttal. However, the final INSD report, published in July
2023, failed to incorporate our responses. The observations
based on my statements were neither revised to align with my
rebuttal nor updated to reflect supporting evidence.
I have also learned that the interviewers themselves were
not provided with either the draft or final versions of the INSD
report, nor were the interviewers informed of the responses
submitted by me or the NYFO. Instead, the report's author relied
Page 6 of 106
UNCLASSITIED//FOUO
EFTA00173378
UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO
01/26/2024
New York, NY
solely on the interviewers' notes, which were not a verbatim
transcription of the interview, and the interview itself was not
recorded. This left critical context about my statements subject
to the author's interpretation. Similarly, the rebuttals
submitted to challenge the observations were not addressed. As a
result, the final report left the original observations largely
unchanged.
In the interest of transparency, I am including the NYFO's
final response to the INSD's draft report. This response was a
collaborative effort between myself, my SSA, my Assistant
Special Agent in Charge (ASAC), and the NYFO's Information
System Security Officer (ISSO) . It was formally submitted as a
rebuttal to the draft observations. Unfortunately, the final
INSD report failed to incorporate these responses, leaving the
contested observations intact. This is deeply troubling, as the
allegations were contested from the outset with the full support
of the NYFO chain of command.
After reviewing the draft INSD report, the NYFO was
afforded an opportunity to respond in writing to both the INSD
"observations" and "findings". The following is the last version
of the NYFO's response that had been drafted by III
, and Office of the Chief Information Officer
(OCIO) . In the "NY's Clarifications to the
Page 7 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173379
UNCLASSIFIED//FOOD
Si 01/26/2024
New York, NY
Inspection Report's Observations" section you will see listed
the "Observation", which was identified by INSD, then the
subsequent "Clarification of Facts", which was the NYFO's
rebuttal to the observations. Following this section, you will
see the "NY's Responses to the Inspection Report's Findings"
section. Similarly, you will see listed the "Instruction", which
was identified by INSD, then the subsequent "Response", which
was the NYFO's rebuttal to the instruction.
NY's Clarifications to the Inspection Report's
Observations
Observation 1: NY was operating a device
providing Internet access through wireless
connectivity in FBI secured space.
Clarification of Facts: NY received authorization
from Security Division in 2018 to utilize Wi-Fi
devices within FBI space, as long as the device
connected to the Wi-Fi was 10 feet from an Enterprise
computer. Regardless, because C20 did not request the
particular Wi-Fi modem/router which was in the lab at
the time of the intrusion, the wireless features were
never utilized and presently there are no wireless
devices in FBI space.
Page 8 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOOD
EFTA00173380
UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO
01/26/2024
New York, NY
Observation 2: NY was connecting overtly and
covertly purchased IT on the IS.
Clarification of Facts: Axiom, Cellebrite and
GrayKey are LE tools purchased by CACHTU and used by
DExT examiners in the Field. CACHTU advised the field
to utilize UCO funds to make purchases of new
equipment to support the tools.
Observation 3: NY was storing DE overnight in an
unapproved storage facility.
Clarification of Facts: The previous practice
utilized by was to image the Original
Digital Evidence on the Network Attached Storage,
place such in Evidence Control, and then copy the
Original Imaged Evidence, creating a Master Working
Copy.
During specific times in 2020, created
a copy of specific files/documents from the Master
Working Copy and brought these limited working copy
items home via his work laptop to perform work related
tasks. The copies he took home to work on were copies
of copies and were limited to specific files from the
larger forensic images. The files/documents were not
Page 9 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO
EFTA00173381
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
01/26/2024
New York, NY
contraband, classified material, CSAM, or sensitive
material. Further, in 2020, FBI Management was
authorizing and encouraging employees to work from
home to limit the spread of COVID 19 in the office.
did not store any files at his house. Once
he completed his analysis he brought the electronic
files/documents back to the office and appropriately
disposed of same.
Observation 4: NY did not appropriately image DE.
Clarification of Facts: This is an issue C-20 has
raised for years with HQ and has routinely asked for
hard drives in order to comply with the policy, but
has been denied and C-20 was advised they would have
to pay for the drives. At the same time, HQ would not
supply C-20 with the funds in order to purchase those
same hard drives.
Additionally, C-20 takes issue with the outdated
process of creating derivative evidence onto an
additional hard drive. As the volume of data that is
being collected has increased exponentially over time,
the amount and cost of using hard drives is
impractical and costly. C-20 suggests the use of
Page 10 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173382
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
13) 01/26/2024
New York, NY
servers or cloud storage as a means to store
derivative copies of evidence, which can be reused at
the conclusion of an investigation and when the
evidence (and derivative evidence) is destroyed.
Observation 5: NY did not appropriately verify
analyzed images of acquired DE.
Clarification of Facts: NY in fact did
appropriately verify analyzed imaged of acquired DE by
generating an FD-302 which documented in the
substantive case file as well as at 305A-HQ-1654544-
DEXT to account for the work performed. Any issues or
discrepancies would be documented in the FD-302. A
hash verification log was also generated and stored
with the DE on the Network Attached Storage, which
could be accessed at any time. Going forward, the
hash value verification log will be attached to the
FD-302 to ensure compliance with policy.
Observation 6: NY was not appropriately
documenting and storing ELSUR records in relation to
undercover communications.
Clarification of Facts: NY appropriately places
OCE/UCE communications in Subfile G of the UCO, which
Page 11 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173383
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
01/26/2024
New York, NY
is where CACHTU policy mandates these communications
be placed.
Observation 7: NY did not document meetings
between UCE/OCE and SSA every 90 days and the SAC/ASAC
every six months.
Clarification of Facts: While the SSA and ASAC
met with the OCE/UCE's connected to the UCO on a
regular basis, primarily in the squad area and via the
file review and CUROC process, NY will draft ECs
documenting same in accordance with policy going
forward.
Observation 8: NY did not utilize covert methods
to procure covertly purchased goods.
Clarification of Facts: The items which were
purchased are Law Enforcement only. NY was provided
funding from HQ via the UCO to make this purchase with
the understanding that it's a restricted purchase.
Going forward, NY will ensure if a purchase needs to
be made overtly, covert funding will be converted to
overt funding by an approved FBI purchaser.
Page 12 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173384
UNCLASSIFIED//FOOO
01/26/2024
New York, NY
Observation 9: NY was not documenting financial
records relating to IMO activity to the appropriate CE
subfile.
Clarification of Facts: NY submits a monthly
BlueSlip that contains all of the financial
documentation for the prior month's financial
activity. The same information that is required to be
submitted to the CE subfile is contained in the
BlueSlip. NY changed the individual who performs the
accounting over time on a field office level and,
while the information was recorded, it was not put
into the CE subfile.
Observation 10: NY did not properly report a
security incident within SIRS.
Clarification of Facts: The incident occurred
during the night of Sunday, February 12, 2023. In the
morning of Monday, 2/13/23, noticed his
Talino was not operating correctly and began trouble
shooting with the company and HQ. Upon determining a
potential intrusion may have occurred,
notified and CACHTU on
2/13/23. Following notification, notified
Page 13 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173385
UNCLASSIFIED//F0130
01/26/2024
New York, NY
on 2/13/23. During the week of 2/13/23,
there were numerous meetings between NY EM, NY Cyber
and NY CIO, among others, in coordination with HQ.
When there was an understanding of what occurred, III
submitted a security incident report within
SIRS on 2/17/23.
Observation 11: NY did not implement encryption
on devices or data on the IS.
Clarification of Facts: There are broad
contradicting policies as it relates to UCO IS. NY
requested assistance in the development and testing
the IS over the several years and was met with no
response from OTD, CART, OCIO, and other HQ level
entities. Going forward, recommendations from OCIO,
OTD, etc., are being implemented.
Observation 13: Policy regarding the requirements
for patching, ATO, use of an ISSO, security
monitoring, remote access, account management,
maintenance or IT hardware, use of mobile devices, and
approval for custom HATA solutions to include
operational security, cost efficiency, SOPs, technical
architecture, accounts and access, system access
Page 14 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173386
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
01/26/2024
New York, NY records, acquisition planning, user account
guidelines, compliance with 0655PG, and training for
covert ISs is insufficient.
Clarification of Facts: NY has one ISSO, hired
in mid-January 2023. NYO's ISSO is responsible for
multiples sites. It is not feasible for one ISSO to
effectively monitor and maintain IS's within the NYO.
Industry standards recommend multiple individuals in
different roles with qualifying credentials to ensure
the integrity of IS's.
Observation 15: NY stored CSAM from multiple
investigations in an effort to identify victims across
multiple cases.
Clarification of Facts: As NCMEC only maintains
the "MD5s" or "hash values" of the CSAM, not the
actual media itself, NY stored CSAM on the IS for
facial recognition and "photo DNA." PG 1157PG requires
a CVIP comparison for CSAM which is facilitated
through NCMEC and does not prohibit the creation of
use of independent ISs to store and compare CSAM
across multiple cases and field offices, noted in
Page 15 of 106
ONCLASSIFIED//FOU0
EFTA00173387
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO 01/26/2024
New York, NY
draft INSD Report page 7. This should not be
prohibited as it is not available through NCMEC/CVIP.
Observation 16: NY did not follow minimal and
commonly accepted industry wide security practices for
the IS.
Clarification of Facts: As there are numerous
conflicting policies and constantly changing guidance
regarding the IS, as it falls under a covert network,
NY did not willfully violate policies or accepted
industry wide security practices and welcomed any and
all assistance from other field offices and HQ
sections.
Guidance and funding of recommended training,
internal and external, should be provided by HQ to
provide consistency of enterprise wide IS standards.
Properly ensuring IS's are developed, maintained and
monitored requires hiring and retaining qualified
personnel such as ISSO's and ITS Network
Specialist/Architectures. Special Agents and non-ITS
Professional Staff are not technically trained and not
equipped to act as a System Administrators
Page 16 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173388
UNCLASSIFIED//FOU0 01/26/2024
New York, NY
NYO has one ISSO with responsibilities spanning
NYO's Headquarter City and all Resident Agencies. The
ISSO was hired and on-boarded in NYO mid-January 2023.
NYO Security does not currently have ITS Network
Specialist/Architectures. NYO Security would require
a minimum of four ISSO's and five ITS Network
Specialist/Architectures to ensure all IS's within NYO
have a System Administrator and all IS's are securely
developed, maintained and monitored. NIST and other
industry standard best practices require designated
personnel outside of the operating unit to act in
these roles. Separation of duties is required to
retain the integrity of the IS's.
NY's Responses to the Inspection Report's
Findings
Instruction 1: ADIC NY shall ensure all
unauthorized devices allowing Internet access through
wireless connectivity are removed from FBI secured
space or disabled.
Response All non-approved wireless devices in FBI
space are disconnected. Devices approved by division(:F1 1:?
Page 17 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO
EFTA00173389
UNCLASSIFIED//F000
01/26/2024
New York, NY head and the AD of SecD will remain operational only
during mission critical needs at this time.
Communication regarding the prohibited use of
wireless devices within FBI space has and will
continue to be disseminated on a regular basis.
Signage is in place referencing policies prohibiting
the use of wireless devices in FBI space. For
example, signs are posted in each elevator bank of 26
Federal Plaza.
All owners of overt and covert portable
electronic devices (PED's) are required to register
devices with NYO's Security unit whereupon the user
accepts the terms of use for said devices. The terms
of use include but are not limited to the prohibited
use of wireless connectivity to include radio
frequency connections such as Wi-Fi and cellular based
Mi-Fi within FBI space.
NYO's Security unit has engaged with NYO's
Technically Trained Agents to begin routine sweeps
within NYO's space to identify active RF's. If RF
devices are identified without a waiver authorizing
Page 18 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOU0
EFTA00173390
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO 01/26/2024
New York, NY
use by NYO's Division Head and the AD of SecD, the
device will be disabled and/or removed from FBI space.
Instruction 2: ADIC NY will ensure overtly and
covertly purchased IT is not used on the same IS.
Response: While this is a HQ driven process, as
CACHTU purchases Axiom, Cellebrite and GrayKey
directly from the vendor on behalf of the Field Office
and provides these tools to the Field, NY is in
contact with CID to ensure IT meets this requirement,
or a waiver is granted.
Instruction 3: ADIC NY will ensure evidence is
stored in a safe, secure, and approved manner.
Response: II =Ilk refutes the assertion he
took home and stored DE at his house. NY will ensure
that appropriate policies related to storage of
evidence are followed.
Instruction 4: ADIC NY will ensure compliance to
applicable policy when creating and maintaining
derivative DE.
Response: NY has consulted with CART and
consistent with CART SOP and PG, the underlining
Page 19 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO
EFTA00173391
UNCLASSIFIED//Fou0
01/26/2024
New York, NY electronic device, as well as the Master Copy, will be
entered into evidence as a 1B. A further additional
copy will be made as a working copy on which the
actual forensic work will be performed. NY will
engage with CACHTU to obtain the appropriate funding
required to obtain the required portable electronic
storage devices to house the increased numbers of
copies. Further, NY is working with NY Evidence and
the Laboratory Division's Field Evidence Program to
obtain authorization for standalone storage devices to
be classified as an appropriate Evidence Control Room
to house Derivative Evidence. The standalone storage
device would contain the same Derivative Evidence
which would otherwise be copied onto hard drives and
physically checked into evidence. The storage device
would be secured with sufficient user credentials and
maintain access logs. The Derivative Evidence would
still require an evidence submission to generate 'Bs
for the Derivative Evidence. At the conclusion of the
case, this Derivative Evidence can be deleted and the
space made available for new Derivative Evidence to be
stored, rather than continuously purchase new hard
drives only to have them destroyed at the conclusion
of an investigation.
Page 20 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO Cl
EFTA00173392
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
01/26/2024
New York, NY
Recommendation 5: ADIC NY will ensure compliance
to applicable policy when creating and maintaining
derivative DE.
Response: NY performs post examination reviews
and documents them via an FD-302. A hash verification
log is also created.
Instruction 6: ADIC NY will ensure compliance
with requirements to document ELSUR records in
accordance with applicable policy.
Response: NY ELSUR stated any communications that
occur via a covert platform (i.e an OCE/UCE cellular
phone) is not ELSUR evidence.
Instruction 7: ADIC NY will ensure compliance
with requirements to document meetings between
undercover personnel and the appropriate SAC/ASAC and
SSA.
Response: NY will document meetings held with the
SSA/OCE and SAC or ASAC/OCE and place in the
appropriate subfile of the UCO via an EC.
Page 21 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO a
EFTA00173393
UNCLASSIFIED//FOU0
01/26/2024
New York, NY
Instruction 8: ADIC NY will ensure compliance
with requirements to employ covert methods to obtain
goods when using confidential funding.
Response: NY will ensure compliance with
requirements for making covert purchases. NY Security
has implemented approval processes for the purchase of
IT equipment. A review of the equipment and purchase
method will be conducted and approved appropriately.
NY CSO is now a member of the UCO local review board
to ensure all policy is adhered to when purchasing,
implementing and utilizing overt/covert electronic
devices and IS technology.
Instruction 9: ADIC NY will ensure compliance
with requirements to maintain and document financial
records related to UCO activity.
Response: NY will ensure that all financial
documentation will be placed in the CE subfile.
Instruction 10: ADIC NY shall ensure compliance
with security incident reporting requirements to
report security incidents within SIRS.
Page 22 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173394
DNCLASSIFIED//FOU0
01/26/2024
New York, NY Response: NY will work with the NY CSO to ensure
all security incidents are reported within the
prescribed time frame per policy.
Instruction 11: ADIC NY shall ensure compliance
with encryption requirement for the IS.
Response: While this does not apply to the UCO,
NY will ensure compliance with encryption policy as
applicable. NY0 Security has engaged with OLIO to
develop secure network protocols based on industry
standards such as NIST to include encryption at rest
and encryption in transit.
Recommendation 15a: ADIC NY should no longer
maintain a set of CSAM for independent analysis
outside of the CV/P approved hash based searching
tools.
Response: NY fulfills its requirements to submit
images of CSAM to NCMEC via the CVIP.
After the final INSD report came out, I was advised that
eceived a call from IIIIIIIIIIlla 111.1who were accusing me of making statements to the effect of
having no regard for following policy. This is of course
Page 23 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED/MOOD
EFTA00173395
UNCLASSIFIED//F000
categorically false and thankfully
much, especially when neither AD could or would provide any
details regarding the allegations such as who heard it, where it 01/26/2024
New York, NY
believed as
was documented, or why it was only then being addressed.
However, in response, I submitted the following:
"Bosses,
Regarding the assertion that I made a statement indicating
I would violate policy for the sake of an operation is a
utter non-sense. Furthermore it is a gross miss-
interpretation of the conversation that was had and quite
frankly an insult to my character and integrity. Aside from
lacking context, the choice of words used is blatantly
misleading.
I'm happy to provide as much context as needed, but in
short I have never, and would never, jeopardize any
investigation (or my career) by intentionally violating
policy. What I have done, and would do, is anything to save
the life of a child. What I said that has been
misconstrued, was that I would do anything to save the life
of a child, and that if I were to ever violate policy or
the law, it would ONLY be because there was an imminent
(taj threat to life in which a clear and articulable except
would apply.
Page 24 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOU0
EFTA00173396
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
01/26/2024
New York, NY I stand by that statement and take great pride in my
knowledge of both the law and policy as it pertains to our
investigations and operations. If requested, I can provide
several examples of having to act under the emergency
exception clause, which have all been justified. If
requested, I can also provide examples of times in which I
didn't, even though doing so would have been easier for the
"operation".
I could write a novel defending myself, my words, and my
intentions; and will if requested. For now I'm relying on
my 15 years as an Agent with outstanding PARs, numerous
awards and accolades, my contributions to policy revisions,
and my reputation to satisfy any concern that may exist."
I believe Digital Extraction Technician (DExT) training was
opened to VCAC Agents in 2012. Int was my instructor
for DExT. As of 2023, I knew Ledford was a Unit Chief (UC) and
led the Cyber Action Team (CAT) . I believe at least three or
four of us initially received DExT training in approximately
2012, but I think all of us working Innocent Images/VCAC on the
squad were eventually trained. However, once the child
exploitation program moved from the Cyber Division to the
Criminal Division, that changed. The funding we received through
the Criminal Division was significantly less than what we
received through Cyber Division, so the DExT program was no
Page 25 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED/At/OO
EFTA00173397
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
(i) longer able to put on as many classes and certify as many people
as it had before. By the time of the intrusion that forms the
basis of this internal inquiry, only about half of the "child
exploitation" Agents on my squad were DExT certified. This is
while we were still with CY-3.
We got certified because the Computer Analysis Response
Team (CART) was long overburdened, and not familiar with the
nuances of the child exploitation violation, such as the types
of programs used by offenders, the vernaculars, etc. It was also
known, and something I witnessed personally, that due to the
reliance on CART and how long it would take for them to prepare
a case for review, "hands-on" offenders were not being arrested
in a timely manner. This resulted in the continuation of child
victimization at the hands of the offenders the FBI was actively
investigating. This was around the same time Agents working
other violations began to also see an increase in the collection
and reliance upon digital evidence in their cases. As DExTs, we
were encouraged, and in some cases I believe required, to assist
CART with their backlog by conducting DExT extractions for other
squads. The other reason was to eliminate the lag time in
searching evidence and identifying contact offenders (offenders
who physically exploited or physically assaulted children)
sooner.
VCAC investigations are different than most other FBI
investigations since, in VCAC investigations, a search warrant
is generally executed in the early stages of an investigation, 01/26/2024
New York, NY
Page 26 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173398
UNCLASSIFIED//POU0
01/26/2024
New York, NY
and the evidence needed to arrest and charge an offender is
usually derived from the materials seized during the execution
of a search warrant. Whereas other squads, generally speaking,
execute search warrants at the culmination of their
investigations.
was a UC of the Crimes Against Children Human
Trafficking Unit (CACHTU) at FBI HQ and eventually an ASAC at
NYFO. He was a huge proponent of DExT. Being DExT trained
allowed us to conduct our own data extractions faster, but more
importantly, it allowed for a faster and more efficient way of
identifying "contact", or "hands-on", offenders and, thus,
rescue child victims of sexual abuse before they could be
further victimized.
After becoming DExT certified, we received DExT equipment
that allowed us to image, process, and better review the digital
files. The DExT training allowed us to better use FBI analytical
programs to review digital evidence. Being DExT certified
allowed us to assist CART by offering an alternative for other
squads to use for data extractions. At the time, CART was not
located in NYFO Headquarters City (HQC) . CART was located in
Moonachie, New Jersey. It could take an hour to get to the CART
lab from the NYFO. CART evidence reviews needed to take place
there and it could take all day. CART eventually moved to NYFO,
HQC.
The volume of data extractions we took on lessened the
burden on CART. At least in New York, CART only had one or two
Page 27 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173399
ONCLASSIF/ED//FOU0
01/26/2024
New York, NY
examiners who could handle data extractions immediately, and
almost certainly none who could respond after hours or on
weekends.
Since we dealt with child victims, it was, and is,
imperative that the digital evidence be processed immediately.
In nearly every child exploitation investigation the digital
evidence is quite literally the evidence to prove the crime and
without a prompt review, there is no probable cause to effect an
arrest, putting the lives of child victims in continued danger.
It is that very risk, the risk of continued abuse, that has
prompted the FBI to enact new policies requiring expeditious
investigation into allegations of child exploitation. This
includes the expeditious review of evidence.
Prior to the DExT training, triaging electronic media on
the site of a search warrant was not really a practice. We had
to take digital evidence back to the office to view it and we
relied more on the post-search interview. After a search, we had
to go back and arrest an offender once we found the evidence.
This made for a significantly more dangerous arrest because the
offenders knew we were coming. There was also the potential for
offender suicide. We had three offender suicides that I can
recall. There was also concern, based on it having actually
happened, that during the time it took the FBI to review seized
material, the offenders were continuing to engage in the sexual
exploitation of minors. The DExT program sought to remedy thi
problem by expediting the time it took to conduct forensic
(SC/)
Page 28 of 106
UNCIASSIFIED//FOU0
EFTA00173400
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
CE:) reviews, thereby expediting our ability to rescue affected
children.
NYF0 SAs / /
, and I were DExT trained. SA (aka
III) was also DExT trained. was the last to be trained
while our squad fell under Cyber Division. At the time, I was
the most junior Agent on the squad. Before being DExT trained,
all of our digital evidence was submitted to CART for data
extractions, imaging, and processing. We did have access to the
Case Agent Investigative Review (CAIR) system, a forensic tool
for data review, but the program was slow, not capable of
handling large evidence reviews, did not work all that well, and
did not do what we in the child exploitation program needed it
to do. As a result, rather than using CAIR, Agents on the squad
opted to travel to Moonachie, New Jersey, where CART was
located, to conduct their reviews on site versus over the CAIR
network. The ineffectiveness of CAIR was no secret and was
widely known, and one of the reasons for the creation of the
autonomous DExT labs.
After collecting digital evidence, I would enter the
digital evidence into the Evidence Control Unit (ECU) and get a
1B evidence number assigned. I would then enter a CART request
with a description of what forensic examinations I needed to be
performed and information on the device that needed to be
extracted. Then I would submit it to CART. It could take a day
or two to get the evidence to CART and the amount of time it 01/26/2024
New York, NY
Page 29 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173401
UNCLASSIPIED//FOU0
(!:/) ould take CART to process the evidence varied. It could take
weeks or months. Once it was extracted, CART would process it in
the Forensic Tool Kit (FTK). We could review the data on CAIR or
go to Moonachie to review it. Everyone on the squad, for the
most part, chose to go to Moonachie. CART Digital Forensic
Examiners Stephen Flatley and Carlos Koo eventually set up a
spot in NYFO, HQC to do data extractions.
Even after receiving DExT training, we used CART for things
like very large media dumps/extractions and encrypted files. We
also used them to help us with understanding what some of the
digital evidence was. I believe CART may have provided us
digital copies of the data extraction and I think it may have
been on DVDs. They would have been accessible on Operational
Wide Area Network (OPWAN) as well, but we did not have OPWAN and
would have to go to CART to access that anyway. I do not recall
what we did with the copies on DVD. CART may have checked them
into evidence and provided a working copy. The DExT trained
Agents would do data dumps on everything we could like hard
drives, loose media, and thumb drives. At this time, telephones
that were seized still needed to go to CART for processing.
In 2015, generally if it was a device we could image, we
would follow this process. We would use write blockers to assure
we did not accidentally manipulate the original data. We would
create an image of our evidence; sometimes we would use another
hard drive. We imaged and processed the data. We had some hard
drives, but I am not sure where they came from. I believe HQ 01/26/2024
New York, NY
Page 30 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED/MONO
EFTA00173402
UNCLASSIFIED//FOOD
Dent us a box of hard drives. I also believe CART may have given us some as well.
We used a forensic duplicator called a TD3, and later a TX-1 as well as FTK Imager, to image a device onto a hard drive and make the derivative evidence. We would then make a working copy image off of the derivative evidence. We would then work off of the working copy.
I am 'pretty sure the derivative evidence was cataloged and placed in the NYFO ECU if that was the policy, but if that was not the policy we would not have done that. The DExT Program provided us with Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAIDs) . These RAIDs were to be used to house our working copy evidence images. I initially advised the interviewing SSAs, once we ran out of hard drives for derivative evidence, we were instructed to use the RAIDs and that these instructions came from either a squad mate or my supervisor. This is true, as it was the SSA and the case Agent for our squad's Group II whose responsibility it was to request and receive funding and equipment. Any requests that we needed were routed through them, and the Group II case Agent was also one of our DExT Agents who also faced the same issues of not having the hard drives to create derivative
evidence. However, I also recall these instructions were
provided by HQ, either our Program Manager (PM), the DExT PM, or both. This may have occurred in 2012 when I went through the DExT program and continued over the years. As there has been a revolving door of PMs, I do not recall the names of the people I 01/26/2024
New York, NY
Page 31 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173403
UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO
gspoke with at the time but can provide as many names of PMs who
I can recall had been there over the years.
Typically, the person running a Group I or Group II
Undercover Operation (UCO) investigation and the squad SSA would
be the people who communicated with HQ for resources. As an
example, I recall in 2015, I sent an email to SA Tommy Thompson,
who was the case agent of our squad's Group II, asking for some
large capacity hard drives with our remaining Group II funds.
This was one of many requests I made, which were generally
verbal, for equipment/resources. At the time we were still
merged with Cyber. When we moved to the Criminal Division, our
funds were nearly wiped out. Sometime thereafter, III' 'I'll
left NYFO and became a DExT PM at FBI HQ. She would often
complain about a lack of funding.
When we first became DExT trained, it was much easier to
comply with the policy since the size of the data was
significantly smaller than it is today. For example, telephone
dumps then often fit on a DVD, or worst case a Blu-ray DVD.
Today, DVDs are nearly obsolete as the size of data collections
has become enormous, requiring large capacity hard drives which
are more expensive and harder to get.
To be 100% compliant with the existing policy each year, it
would likely require C-20 alone to purchase over a hundred hard
drives, and this is just one squad in one office. To ensure that
everyone in the FBI is compliant each year, the FBI would likely 01/26/2024
New York, NY
have to purchase thousands of hard drives, then do this year
Page 32 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173404
UNCLASSIFIED//FOOO
after year. But the FBI does not do this and the policy it
9)
created to cover search warrants decades ago has not changed,
despite the fact the environment the policy applies to has.
This is one of the several fundamental flaws that I have
and continue to voice. If creating derivative evidence is a
requirement, then why does the FBI not automatically provide the
hard drives? How can the FBI enforce a policy without providing
the field with the ability to comply? If, in nearly every search
warrant executed FBI-wide electronic media is seized, resulting
in the need for derivative evidence hard drives, why is it then
incumbent upon each individual squad, in each office, under each
program and division, to figure out a way to obtain the funding
to purchase them? If the FBI knows hard drives cannot easily be
purchased in bulk, and that there are security requirements on
where the drives must be manufactured, why does the FBI not just
purchase them for us rather than place that nearly impossible
burden on us?
In approximately 2017 I took over as case Agent for our
squad's Group II. As the case Agent I was able to use Group II
funds to make purchases, which were obligated to us through
CACHTU.
I was running out of hard drive space for derivative
evidence and of storage space in general. The PMs told us buying
hard drives in bulk was a problem. The stores had a capacity
limit, but I was advised to try anyway but was not successful. I
would purchase the drives on Amazon, like I was instructed to do
Page 33 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO 01/26/2024
New York, NY
EFTA00173405
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
(—/li y HQ, until my covert account was shut down by Amazon since the
purchasing of large quantities of hard drives was flagged as
suspicious. We were also purchasing hard drives from New Egg,
like we were instructed to do by HQ, specifically SSA Heath
Graves who was the DExT PM, because they could sell bulk (10 or
more) hard drives, but I was later told by someone in the
Procurement Unit we could not use New Egg. This left us with
very few options for buying hard drives and despite voicing
these issues, no one at HQ offered a solution. In speaking with
other Agents across the FBI, I learned this was a common
problem. I went to CART who gave us what hard drives they could
spare. I specifically sought assistance from senior CART
Technician Steven Flatley on a regular basis and aside from
seeking his expertise, I constantly bothered him for hard drives
and other needed items.
In 2017 I began to gain a voice among many FBI Child
Exploitation circles. I took over our squad's Group II UCO, and
almost immediately converted it into a Group I. This conversion,
which allows for the use of sensitive techniques, was done due
to my desire to enhance our undercover capabilities and increase
our effectiveness by using some of the most robust undercover
techniques available at the time. While every undercover
operation must be approved every six months in front of the
Criminal Undercover Operations Review Committee (CUORC), because
ours was now a Group I, it also had to be presented up through
15 CACHTU and approved by the AD. During the CUORC, I brought up 01/26/2024
New York, NY
Page 34 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FO4O
EFTA00173406
UNCLASSIFIED//FOLIO
(i)the funding issues. In the funding section we discussed what we
spent and what we anticipated to spend. During my time as the
case Agent for my squad's Group I, my squad's statistical
accomplishments increased exponentially. The number of
undercover sessions conducted by my squad increased by 198% in
the four years after I took over the NYFO child exploitation
program compared to the four years prior. This meant an increase
of approximately 2000 undercover sessions in the same four-year
span. More significantly, however, was how I tasked undercovers
and provided direction to ensure the program worked to identify
the most vulnerable of the exploited children; and set out to
rescue them. The results cannot be overstated in that the lives
of hundreds of children were saved. While I am personally
responsible for saving the lives of hundreds, many hundreds, if
not thousands more were saved because of how I managed and
directed the child exploitation program. 01/26/2024
New York, NY
In 2018 I did a five-week temporary duty assignment (TDY)
at CACHTU. My former SSA, Sean Watson, was the UC there. My job
was to call every VCAC Group I and Group II UCO Case Agent and
ask questions about the issues they were having and to provide
recommendations on how to better the program, how CACHTU could
better assist the field, things that needed improvement, etc. I
learned a lot about the issues affecting the entire child
Page 35 of 106
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
EFTA00173407
UNCLASSIFIED//FOUO
@I) xploitation program and, while there were some differences in
the issues facing some offices over others, there were a number
of common issues that impacted every office. These issues
largely dealt with lack of guidance, direction, training,
equipment, DExT support, funding, and personnel. I drafted a
summary of the calls I made and created a section for complaints
from the field in reference to DExT and provided my assessment
to CACHTU leadership. One of the many takeaways was that nearly
every office had different understandings of and methods of
complying with policy and guidance. The lack of and often
conflicting guidance and policy both from CACHTU and from
individual field office chains of command had led to each field
office having to adapt their ways and creating a complete lack
of consistency across the FBI. This summary was also provided to
the interviewing Agents, and I can make it available to whomever
needs it.
This same assessment, as well as additional details were
also provided to Bryan Vorndran, who was the Deputy Assistant
Director (DAD) who covered child exploitation, as well as to my
immediate supervisor and to the supervisors/PMs at CACHTU. This
came as DAD Vorndran separately requested a working group of
Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to address the needs of the VCAC
program. I explained to him how we had equipment, training, and
guidance needs and provided my assessment both orally and in
several documents.
Page 36 of 106
UNCLASSIPIED//FOUO 01/26/2024
New York, NY
EFTA00173408
UNCLASSIFIED//FOU0
01/26/2024
New York, NY Also in 2018, CACHTU PMs SSAs Michael Deizlak and Matthew Chicantek were presenting to EM on the issues facing child exploitation investigations. SSA Deizlak and SSA Chicantek requested information from me that they wanted to present. I emailed SSA Deizlak and SSA Chicantek, along with UC Sean Watson of CACHTU, the write-up I sent after my TDY as well as a separate, even more detailed summary of the issues. In this three -page summary I talked about the need to appropriate money for equipment, as well as details regarding issues affecting the program, including the DExT, guidance, support, and more.
Others and I made it very clear to HQ that we did not have hard drives. Every now and then they would send us some and every now and then they would send funds, but nothing was consistent. I also informed my SSA of the need for hard drives. I was aware he knew we needed them and there were no funds. Other Agents were dealing with the same issues. It has been, and continues to be, the practice of VCAC Agents to create
derivative copies of original evidence if derivative hard drives are available. However, given the long history of not receiving either the hard drives or the funds to purchase them, VCAC Age