Beyond Tourism Coordinated Pathways to Inclusive Prosperity 2025
Page 14 of 26 · WEF_Beyond_Tourism_Coordinated_Pathways_to_Inclusive_Prosperity_2025.pdf
Applying the
ecosystem approach 3
The sector’s transformation at scale, as highlighted
earlier, requires coordinated action by multiple
stakeholders. Although fragmented approaches are
often the norm, there is compelling evidence from
global, national and local examples that systematic
ecosystem coordination delivers significant impact
and drives change. In the following case studies, nine destinations show how coordination in practice
transforms challenges into opportunities. Each
example clarifies the core problem that threatened
system coherence, the ecosystem coordination
approach adopted, the specific enablers that were
activated and the impact metrics and qualitative
outcomes achieved.
3.1 Case studies of ecosystem tourism developmentGlobal success stories demonstrate
how ecosystem coordination delivers
measurable value at different scales.
CASE STUDY 1
Portugal: Rebalancing tourism through whole-of-economy coordination
Challenge: Increased friction – visitors vs. residents
Enablers used: Infrastructure; finance; technology and
innovation; people and skills; policy and governance
When Portugal emerged from the 2008 global financial crisis,
its tourism sector faced the tension points of geographical
concentration and community resistance. Arrivals rebounded
rapidly, but growth concentrated heavily in Lisbon and Porto,
creating congestion in airports and urban districts while leaving
much of the interior underdeveloped.29 Competing ministries
planned separately. Transport authorities prioritized airport
expansion, environmental agencies imposed disconnected
regulations and regional governments competed for investment
without alignment. Local communities expressed growing
concern over the impact of overtourism on housing, services
and cultural authenticity. Without coordination, tourism risked
widening economic disparities, undermining sustainability and
eroding public support.
Portugal addressed these pressures by embedding
tourism in a national coordination effort that cut across
all key levers. Airport, rail, coastal management and
regional growth strategies were planned in tandem through interministerial committees.30 A dedicated Tourism
Investment Fund combined European structural funds,
state capital and private investment with projects screened
for competitiveness, environmental sustainability and
community impact.31 Digital platforms connected small
enterprises to broader marketing and booking systems.
National hotel schools and training institutes aligned with
employer needs and portable credentials from across
the European Union were recognized, improving labour
mobility.32 The national tourism strategy drew input from
more than 1,700 stakeholders including small businesses,
municipalities, environmental groups and investors, which
strengthened legitimacy.33
Tourism receipts more than doubled between 2010 and 2019,
and the sector’s contribution to GDP reached 15%.34 More
than 400,000 jobs were directly linked to tourism. Visitor flows
diversified geographically, with northern and central Portugal
increasing their share of overnight stays from 28% to 36%,
reducing pressure on Lisbon and Porto.35 Resident satisfaction
with tourism rose in surveys. Jointly developed sustainability
certification schemes now cover hundreds of operators and
coastal planning, and visitor dispersal reduced pressure on
the Algarve and Lisbon waterfronts.36
Beyond Tourism: Coordinated Pathways to Inclusive Prosperity
14
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: