Building Economic Resilience to the Health Impacts of Climate Change 2025
Page 40 of 49 · WEF_Building_Economic_Resilience_to_the_Health_Impacts_of_Climate_Change_2025.pdf
Next steps:
a call to action
Climate change is a present and growing risk
to both human health and the continuity of all
businesses. From extreme heat affecting the
safety of workers to climate-driven supply chain
disruption, no sector is immune. Investing early
in health resilience can save lives and significantly
reduce economic losses.
For business leaders, three strategic actions
can guide an effective climate-health
resilience strategy.
1. Understand the health risks most relevant to
the workforce, customers and communities.
–Assess climate-health exposure across
operations and supply chains: Conduct
a risk assessment to pinpoint how climate
hazards could directly affect employee well-
being, customer safety and community health.
–Prioritize the most severe and likely health
threats: Focus on risks that have the highest
potential impact on health and business
continuity in the specific sector and region.
–Use data and early-warning systems to
anticipate health impacts: Harness climate
data (for example, heatwave forecasts,
disease surveillance) and health information
to identify vulnerable hotspots. Data-driven
insights can help pinpoint which locations or
groups need urgent protective measures.
2. Prioritize, plan and carry out interventions
to safeguard health and build resilience.
–Prioritize high-impact, “no-regret”
actions that protect the highest number
of people and assets: Not all interventions
are equal – companies should focus on
those that can reach the largest portion
of their workforce or customer base and
significantly reduce risk.
–Weigh costs against benefits and timing:
Assess each action’s required investment,
feasibility and time-to-value, aiming for a
balance between quick wins and longer-
term investments.
–Take advantage of co-benefits and
synergies: Companies should look for
interventions that deliver co-benefits in areas like
climate mitigation, sustainability or social impact. –Tailor solutions to the specific business
context and embed them into strategy:
Design measures that fit the organization’s
size and industry, and embed these into
core business strategy. A small enterprise
might start with simple steps (for example,
flexible work hours during heatwaves),
whereas a multinational can enforce higher
standards across its supply chain.
–Avoid maladaptation that creates new
vulnerabilities: Interventions should be
evaluated for unintended consequences.
For example, relying solely on air
conditioning to cope with heat can increase
emissions or strain power grids, ultimately
exacerbating climate risks.
3. Collaborate to amplify impact and cultivate
systemic change.
–No single company can address climate-
health challenges alone: Companies
can work with public agencies, non-
governmental organizations, philanthropists
and their peers to pool resources and
learnings to avoid duplication of effort and
magnify impact.
–Critically, companies should
also collaborate across sectors:
Opportunities are plentiful – for example,
agribusinesses can partner with insurers
to develop climate-specific coverage for
crop losses, and healthcare providers can
support built environment companies with
health-based designs.
A call to immediate action
The business case for building resilience to climate-
health risks is clear: proactive adaptation is far
more cost-effective than spontaneous response
to escalating disruptions, and it builds long-term
stability and competitive edge. The case for action
has been laid out – in the data, the interventions
and the examples of innovators already making
headway. What remains is for executive leaders
across all sectors to translate this knowledge into
bold commitments and concrete initiatives. This is a
call to action for every chief executive officer, board
member and investor: embed climate-health
resilience into core business strategy today. The business
case for building
resilience to
climate-health risks
is clear: proactive
adaptation is far
more cost-effective
than spontaneous
response to
escalating
disruptions.
Building Economic Resilience to the Health Impacts of Climate Change 40
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: