Financing Sustainable Aviation Fuels 2025
Page 12 of 44 · WEF_Financing_Sustainable_Aviation_Fuels_2025.pdf
5. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): Given
the large volumes of CO2 generated during
gasification, integrating CCS technology is
becoming increasingly important for achieving
negative or near-zero lifecycle emissions.
Implementing CCS requires additional capital
investment in gas separation, compression
and storage infrastructure. In some cases,
the CO2 removed can be reused in other
industrial processes, which could offset some
operational costs.
Power-to-Liquid
The Power-to-Liquid (PtL) pathway, which produces
fuels also known as e-fuels or eSAF, comes at a
significantly higher CapEx compared to other SAF
pathways. This is driven by the complexity and
energy intensity of the process, which involves
multiple steps to convert renewable electricity, water
and CO2 into synthetic fuels. Significant innovation
will be needed over the years for this pathway to
become cost competitive with traditional jet fuel.
The benefit however is that this pathway, unlike the
bio-fuels alternatives, could be easily scaled-up.
The main infrastructure components that drive
CapEx for PtL are:
1. Electrolysers for hydrogen production from
water electrolysis: These are powered by
renewable electricity (e.g. solar or wind). These
are currently expensive and require significant energy, resulting in the largest contributor to
overall CapEx.
2. Renewable energy infrastructure: PtL facilities
depend on renewable electricity for electrolysis
and other processes. Some projects can use
existing grids via power purchase agreements
(PPAs), reducing upfront costs. Others may
need to build onsite solar or wind farms, where
feasible, increasing CapEx but improving long-
term energy security. As electrolysers need
continuous operations and renewable energy is
intermittent, energy storage solutions, such as
batteries, can further raise CapEx.
3. CO2 capture and conditioning: PtL pathways
need a reliable CO2 source, which can come
from industrial emissions, biomass or direct air
capture (DAC). Industrial CO2 capture usually
involves lower CapEx due to higher CO2
concentrations but requires proximity to emitters.
In addition, there are regulatory limitations if
CO2 is captured from industrial processes
originated from burning fossil fuel. DAC offers
location flexibility but involves significantly higher
CapEx due to its energy-intensive process and
advanced filtration systems.
4. Reverse water gas shift and Fischer-Tropsch
(FT) synthesis: After hydrogen and CO2 are
produced and captured, they are converted
into syngas and further into hydrocarbons.
Unless facilities can rely on existing capacity
in close proximity, this will also contribute to
overall CapEx .
The PtL pathway
comes at a
significantly higher
CapEx than other
SAF pathways,
but unlike the bio-
fuels alternatives,
it could be easily
scaled-up.
12 Financing Sustainable Aviation Fuels
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: