Global Economic Futures Competitiveness in 2030 2025
Page 28 of 35 · WEF_Global_Economic_Futures_Competitiveness_in_2030_2025.pdf
Indicator descriptions and sources TABLE 4
Dimension Indicator Rationale Source
Reliance on
foreign workersShare of foreign workers
in industry workforce (%)Reflects industries’ dependence on foreign labour.
Sectors with a higher share of foreign workers may
face higher exposure to restrictions on talent flows in
scenarios characterized by regulatory tightening and
geopolitical volatility.International Labour
Organization (2024,
or latest available)
FDI intensity Share of FDI in
value added (%)Captures contribution of FDI to the industry output.
Higher FDI intensity signals strong baseline capital
attractiveness but also may make industries more
exposed to shifts in international capital flows and
investment restrictions.UN Trade and Development.
(2024). World Investment
Report 2024. (2021-2023
average). United Nations
Statistics Division (2021-
2023 average). World Bank
(2021-2023).
Export intensity Share of exports
in value added (%)Measures industries’ reliance on international trade.
Industries with higher export intensity may be more
exposed to geopolitical and regulatory frictions,
as well as changing trade and investment policies.OECD Trade in
Value Added (TiVA)
(2018-2020 average).
Vulnerability to
cross-border
technology
restrictionsData intensity
(non-capitalized
software expenditure
per worker) (%)Captures the impact of fragmentation on industry
operations and access to technology. Industries with
higher data intensity are likely to be more exposed to
fragmentation trends within the scenarios.Information Technology
and Innovation Foundation
(2021).
Domestic
value addedShare of domestic value
added in production (%)Captures the degree to which industries rely on
domestic value creation in their production processes.
Industries with a higher share of domestic value
added are more likely to be insulated from geopolitical
risks or cross-border regulatory divergence,
reflecting greater self-sufficiency and local economic
integration.OECD Trade in
Value Added (TiVA)
(2018-2020 average).
Intensity of
government supportLog count of industrial
and trade policy
interventionsProxies the level of government support and
strategic importance. Industries with a higher level
of support are more likely to benefit from insulation
and preferential access to resources in periods
of disruption.Global Trade Alert
(2022-2025).
Regulatory maturity ISO standards adoption
intensity, adjusted for
industry sizeProxies industries’ level of regulatory maturity and
readiness to absorb and navigate regulatory changes.ISO Survey (2023).
S&P Capital IQ (2024).
Firms churn rate Sum of firm entry
and exit rates (%)Captures industries’ level of dynamism and
competition. A high firms churn rate indicates a more
competitive and fluid business environment but also
potential volatility as firms navigate changing market
conditions and regulatory or geopolitical pressures.Eurostat (2022). United
States Census Bureau
(2022). New Zealand Stats
(2022). E-stat Statistics of
Japan (2016). Statistics
Canada (2022). Australian
Bureau of Statistics (2022).
Korean Statistical Information
Service (2022). Brazilian
Institute of Geography and
Statistics (2021). UK Office
for National Statistics (2022).
Profit margin Earnings before interest
and tax (EBIT)-to-
revenue ratioAccounts for baseline financial health influencing
industries’ ability to support growth strategies and
respond to shocks.S&P Capital IQ
(2022-2024 average).
Global Economic Futures: Competitiveness in 2030 28
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: