Intergenerational Foresight 2026
Page 35 of 57 · WEF_Intergenerational_Foresight_2026.pdf
1 Elite capture and institutional erosion
Political and corporate elites dominate licensing, contracting and revenue allocation.86 Resource rents fund patronage,
weaken oversight bodies and reshape rules in favour of incumbents. As institutions lose independence and
enforcement capacity, they become less able to resist capture.87 Institutional weakness does not merely fail to prevent
capture. It stabilizes it.
2 Export dependence and structural vulnerability
Reliance on raw material exports entrenches asymmetric bargaining power, as multinational firms control global value
chains.88 Limited domestic value addition and fiscal diversification narrow policy options, reinforcing dependence on
extraction rents and discouraging alternative development pathways.
3 Demographic pressure and performative inclusion
Rising civic expectations, particularly among youth, are met with symbolic participation.89 Consultations proceed
without binding authority. Dashboards display data without decision rights. Community trusts distribute benefits
without control. The gap between participation and power erodes trust and destabilizes local governance without
altering authority structures.90
4 Complexity, opacity and the governance mirage (reinforcing)
Legal frameworks and monitoring systems are designed in highly technical forms that communities cannot realistically
interpret or contest.91 This gap produces transparency without agency. As collective capacity to challenge decisions
declines, authority recentralizes even as institutions claim compliance with global governance norms.As demands for inclusion grow, exclusion is
becoming more sophisticated.73 Nowhere is
this more visible than in frontline and Indigenous
communities whose lands underpin extraction.74
The Niger Delta illustrates the stakes.75 Decades of
oil production have generated vast wealth for elites
and multinational firms, while local communities bear
severe environmental degradation and entrenched
poverty.76 This outcome reflects not an accidental
failure of “trickle-down” development, but an actively
maintained governance loop in which extraction
finances the very systems that prevent redistribution
and accountability.77
Demographic change is accelerating this legitimacy
crisis.78 More than 60% of the population in Sub-
Saharan Africa is under 25 and by 2050, the region
is projected to account for approximately 25%
of the world’s population, compared with around
7% for Europe.79 This youth cohort is increasingly
politically conscious and less tolerant of inherited
exclusion, particularly for Indigenous and frontline
communities.80 Across the region, youth-led
movements demand more than improved benefit-
sharing.81 They call for meaningful stewardship over extraction decisions, including authority over terms,
enforcement and long-term restoration.
In response, a more insidious pattern has emerged:
the resource governance mirage.82 The language
of reform, participation and benefit-sharing is
adopted, while real authority remains centralized
through legal complexity, technocratic opacity
and performative consultation.83 Governments
and institutions invite communities to participate
without giving them the power to decide, monitor
or enforce. Institutions increase transparency, yet
they do not expand agency.
At the same time, countervailing signals point to
alternative trajectories. Youth-led civic technology
initiatives demand open contracting and legible
governance.84 Indigenous sovereignty movements
increasingly link environmental justice to economic
self-determination. Hybrid governance arrangements
combining Indigenous authority with democratic
accountability are emerging in pockets across the
continent.85 Together, these signals suggest that
incremental reform is insufficient. Structural redesign
of power is the decisive leverage point.REGIONAL CONTEXT
Legitimacy and participation in resource governance
SYSTEM DYNAMICS
Governance structures and power distribution
Four reinforcing dynamics can explain why extractive governance patterns persist across Sub-Saharan
Africa, despite repeated reform efforts.
Intergenerational Foresight: An Approach for Long-Term Responsibility in Governance
35
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: