Nature Positive Financing the Tranisition in Cities
Page 19 of 47 · WEF_Nature_Positive_Financing_the_Tranisition_in_Cities.pdf
For the purpose of this report, the analysis of MDB
urban nature spend encompasses all approved
project finance that has impacts on nature, noting
that all MDB investments have environmental due
diligence assessments to ensure harm is limited.
Without quantified impacts, investments cannot be
categorized as nature positive.
This analysis serves as an initial step towards
understanding direction and magnitudes of
urban nature finance flows. It aims to support the
standardization of terminology and the development
of traceability mechanisms for nature-positive
finance and nature mainstreaming. By doing so,
it seeks to identify investment opportunities and
expedite the transition to nature-positive cities
more effectively. Urban nature’s share in global
development finance
Analysis of public MDB project data illustrates
the financial flows from MDBs that is invested in
nature finance (including both nature mainstreaming
efforts and nature-positive finance).31 Overall analysis
illustrates that urban nature finance makes up only a
small portion of the total MDB nature finance flows.
Approved MDB spend on projects related to nature
in the urban realm has made up, on average, less
than 10% of the total approved project expenditure
for nature over the last decade. Despite the growing
need for urban nature investment, MDBs are either
investing in other areas, focusing in rural area, or
both. Findings suggest that nature investments by
MDBs are largely conducted outside cities.
Spending on urban nature sector
Global trends, innovations and crises, such as
the COVID-19 pandemic, the emergence of new
renewable energy technologies, and the rising
costs of goods and services, show a considerable
influence in MDB spending on nature over the past
decade when comparing spending before and after
the pandemic (see Figure 4). A sectoral breakdown reveals that investments in nature do not solely
come from a designated budget line for nature,
but instead stem from expenditures across various
sectors, all of which interact with nature.
Figure 5 illustrates the key sectors relevant
to the environmental agenda in cities and the
changes in MDB financial flows from 2018
to 2023.Total Nature Urban nature112.6 112.6109.9
91.293.4112.5
102.8
56.9117.5
32.5
26.9
19.428.2 29.6
6.94.48.05.0 4.47.59.625.037.044.049.853.1
4.3 3.822.1
2.8Data for 2024 is not
complete and shows
only finance for projects
approved between
January and July
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Units in $, billions, by yearApproved total, nature and urban nature project spend by selected banks (2015-2024) FIGURE 4
Source: World Economic Forum analysis of publically available MDB project data from: Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB); Asian Development Bank
(ADB), Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), African Development Bank (AfDB), European Investment Bank (EIB), European Bank for Reconstruction and
Development (EBRD), World Bank Group (WBG).
Nature Positive: Financing the Transition in Cities
19
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: