Nature Positive Financing the Tranisition in Cities
Page 29 of 47 · WEF_Nature_Positive_Financing_the_Tranisition_in_Cities.pdf
Limitations to cities’ enabling environment (continued) TABLE 3
Enabler Limitation Impact on nature
mainstreaming Impact on nature-
positive finance
Stakeholder
engagementUnfamiliarity with investment topic
Limited and jargon-heavy communication
about the benefits and impacts of investing
in nature has left institutional investors
poorly informed about the technicalities and
associated risks.
This results in fewer projects being
developed and fewer successful business
models globally, as nature projects are
often tailored to specific circumstances and
locations. Additionally, investors struggle
to assess the nature impact of potential
investment opportunities, which affects their
investment criteria.54Limits the ability of financiers to
raise awareness on alternative
engineering solutions (such
as nature-based or combined
approaches) and hampers the
development of new, impactful
and innovative solutions
that have a positive impact
on nature.Deprioritizes the urban
nature agenda, as national
governments prefer to finance
initiatives that have large
environmental impacts and
operate on a large scale.55
CapabilitiesCapacity constraints
Governments often face resource
constraints, which can hinder their ability
to effectively use the skills and capabilities
present within their own workforce when
applying for project funding.
This limitation necessitates significant
technical support from MDBs throughout
the due diligence and appraisal
process.56,57,58,59,60Introduces challenges with
using complex financial
instruments such as green
bonds, which require extensive
due diligence processes that
may take up to eight months.61Creates difficulty with
structuring projects that meet
MDB environmental and social
safeguards objectives.62
29
Nature Positive: Financing the Transition in Cities
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: