Nature Positive Role of the Automotive Sector
Page 48 of 62 · WEF_Nature_Positive_Role_of_the_Automotive_Sector.pdf
Appendix
Impacts and dependencies
analysis
The sector-average assessment of the top drivers
of nature loss shown in Table 2 is mostly based on
ENCORE,253 and follows a four-step process.
First, the relevant sub-industries were identified
at an ISIC class level254 for each stage of the
value chain. After initially shortlisting the ISIC
classes for the midstream section of the value
chain (direct operations), the ENCORE upstream
and downstream “links” were used to map each
midstream ISIC class to relevant upstream and
downstream ones. A manual review was also
conducted to identify any other relevant categories,
resulting in a total of 59 ISIC classes mapped to
the value chain stages for the automotive sector.
Second, the ENCORE “pressures” were mapped
to the five IPBES (Intergovernmental Science-
Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem
Services) drivers of biodiversity and ecosystem
change.255 Note, “Resource exploitation” was
mapped solely to “Volume of water use”, as the
other pressures (“Other biotic resource extraction
(e.g. fish, timber)” and “Other abiotic resource
extraction”) were not material for the automotive
sector, and “Introduction of invasive species” was
similarly excluded given the materiality was mostly
low or below for all ISIC classes where a value was
assigned. See Table 8 for the complete mapping. Third, for each stage of the value chain and
IPBES driver, an average of the ENCORE
“pressure materiality rating” was computed
across all the ISIC classes where a materiality
value was assigned (i.e. not N/A or ND). This was
summarized in Table 2 for those with medium, high
or very high materiality.
Finally, this output was tested with business,
civil society and academic industry experts via
interviews and consultation workshops, and the
final ratings were adapted based on the feedback
provided. For the automotive sector specifically,
this involved updating the “midstream, pollution”,
“midstream, water use” and “downstream,
pollution” from low to medium materiality, and
“downstream, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions”
section from medium to high materiality.
The impact and dependency descriptions in
Chapter 2 also use the ENCORE “pressure
materiality ratings”, “pressure links”, “dependency
materiality ratings” and “dependency links”
datasets alongside several other sources. These
include CDP Water Watch, WWF Water and
Biodiversity Risk Filters, academic papers, civil
society reviews, company-specific insights and
assessments, analysis by the World Economic
Forum and industry expert interviews and
consultation workshops. The results of this analysis
were then used to inform the development of the
priority actions.
Mapping from ENCORE “pressures” to five IPBES drivers TABLE 8
IPBES drivers of biodiversity
and ecosystem change Relevant ENCORE “pressures”
Land-use change
and ecosystem
disturbance –Area of land use
–Area of freshwater use
–Area of seabed use
Pollution –Emissions of toxic soil and water pollutants
–Emissions of nutrient soil and water pollutants
–Emissions of non-GHG air pollutants
–Generation and release of solid waste
–Disturbances (e.g. noise, light)
Resource exploitation (water use) –Volume of water use
GHG emissions –Emissions of GHGs
Nature Positive: Role of the Automotive Sector
48
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: