Open but Secure Europe%E2%80%99s Path to Strategic Interdependence 2025
Page 19 of 31 · WEF_Open_but_Secure_Europe%E2%80%99s_Path_to_Strategic_Interdependence_2025.pdf
capabilities. Proposals such as a “CERN for AI”
could pool resources – computing power, talent
and infrastructure – into a European innovation hub
to drive breakthroughs and establish the bloc as a
global technology leader. Together, these measures
would weave resilience, innovation and security into
the fabric of Europe’s technological future.
Until these domestic policies bear fruit, however,
it is crucial to maintain a high degree of trade
openness with key technology suppliers. Achieving
this means navigating geopolitical challenges,
including fostering a workable relationship with the
US under a Trump presidency. Refining the EU-US
Trade and Technology Council to focus on strategic
collaboration on topics such as export controls, AI,
semiconductors, biotech and defence technologies
would be a pragmatic step towards fostering
shared objectives.
These efforts should be complemented by an EU
commitment to increase international alignment on trade, industrial policies, investment screening,
market access and competition policy. As part of
this, the EU should pursue closer administrative
cooperation to reduce regulatory friction and
streamline trade with partners. As discussed
in Laurence Tubiana’s chapter, the EU’s Global
Gateway investment initiative can be expanded
to support high-tech cooperation in AI, rare earth
extraction and processing, and semiconductors.
Together, these policies would reflect the EU’s
commitment to international collaboration, not
as a passive actor but as a proactive architect of
a multipolar global order. By integrating smarter
technological investments, industrial policy and
better trade relations into a cohesive strategy,
Europe can foster a form of interdependence
that strengthens both global partnerships and
its own resilience. Indeed, the future of Europe’s
competitiveness and security hinges on placing
research and innovation, science and technology at
the heart of Europe’s economy. Proposals
such as a “CERN
for AI” could
pool resources
into a European
innovation
hub to drive
breakthroughs
and establish the
bloc as a global
technology leader.
Summary of recommendations
–First, the EU should review its regulation and
withdraw any unnecessary regulatory and
administrative barriers, streamline member
state policies (e.g. regarding funding) and help
companies navigate legal complexities.
–To ensure competitiveness and security, the
EU should rethink its approach to technology
and innovation by playing to its strengths.
–To boost public funding for innovation, the
European Innovation Council could tap into
pension and insurance funds and develop
schemes to coordinate investments across
member states to unlock the advantages of
the single market.
–To entice more private sector funding, the EU
could minimize investor risk by introducing robust de-risking tools, such as loan
and guarantee programmes backed by
EU institutions.
–Greater investment in Europe’s infrastructure is
needed, especially in water supply, hydrogen
pipelines, charging points, renewable energy
technologies and 5G networks. Funding
should be directed towards creating a
European innovation hub to pool talent and
computing power.
–To bridge the gap until these policies take
effect, the EU should prioritize robust trade
openness with technology suppliers (e.g. by
refining the EU-US Trade and Technology
Council), seek closer alignment with partners
on technology policies and expand Global
Gateway investments.
Open but Secure: Europe’s Path to Strategic Interdependence
19
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: