Resilient Economies Strategies for Sinking Cities and Flood Risks 2025
Page 16 of 49 · WEF_Resilient_Economies_Strategies_for_Sinking_Cities_and_Flood_Risks_2025.pdf
Land subsidence represents an urgent yet
underrecognized global risk. Often described as a
“silent” challenge, its gradual progression obscures
its true scale, making detection difficult until critical
thresholds are surpassed and consequences become severe. While sudden sinking can happen,
the slow onset, combined with diverse local drivers,
contributes to a lack of urgency in both public and
private sector agendas. Several persistent barriers
continue to impede decisive action.1.3 What are the barriers to action?
These barriers perpetuate a reactive approach,
with interventions typically occurring only after
significant damage has taken place. In an era of
rapid urbanization and climate volatility, economies
and societies can no longer afford to treat land
subsidence as an isolated or secondary issue.A fundamental shift is required: from reactive to
proactive, strategic resilience building to land
subsidence, associated risks and compounding
factors. Addressing land subsidence and its
interaction with sea-level rise and extreme weather
demands a holistic, collaborative approach.
Without collective action, the liveability and stability
of several cities worldwide are at risk.Disconnection from climate agendas: Despite clear links to climate change,
land subsidence remains largely absent from mainstream climate policy and
discourse. The disconnect limits development of integrated, cross-sectoral
solutions and reduces opportunities for alignment with broader urban and climate
resilience strategies.
Limited awareness and understanding: The complex interdependences and
feedback loops between land subsidence, human activity and their socioeconomic
and environmental costs are poorly understood outside academia, government and
businesses directly involved. This lack of shared understanding reduces urgency and
weakens consensus for collective action.
Data gaps and limited access: Even where awareness exists, the data needed
to analyse and respond to subsidence is scattered across institutions and often
inaccessible. Without comprehensive, up-to-date information, governments,
businesses and communities cannot assess risks or target investments effectively.
Lack of standards and coordination: There is a notable absence of international
standards for measuring, monitoring and responding to subsidence, particularly
regarding its interaction with sea-level rise and extreme weather. This gap limits
benchmarking, accountability and the development and adoption of effective
solutions. While initiatives such as the United Nations Educational, Scientific and
Cultural Organization (UNESCO) Land Subsidence International Initiative are facilitating
global exchange of information, broader engagement across sectors is needed.89
Insufficient urgency and investment: The often gradual nature of subsidence
can relegate it to a lower priority until disaster strikes. This results in limited public
awareness, insufficient funding and a lack of public-private engagement, which can
be exacerbated by the challenge of demonstrating immediate financial returns on
prevention, mitigation and adaptation measures. The absence of clear attribution
between asset damage and land subsidence can further impede action. While sudden
sinking can
happen, the slow
onset, combined
with diverse local
drivers, contributes
to a lack of urgency
in both public and
private sector
agendas.
Resilient Economies: Strategies for Sinking Cities and Flood Risks
16
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: