Rethinking Media Literacy 2025
Page 12 of 45 · WEF_Rethinking_Media_Literacy_2025.pdf
Implementing MIL programmes poses several
systemic and practical challenges that call for
multistakeholder solutions.
Commitment from the international community
There is a resounding commitment from the
international community on the need and continued
urgency to advance MIL, most recently reaffirmed
in the UN Pact for the Future. However, differing
interpretations of MIL’s scope – encompassing
digital education, media literacy and digital
skills – along with the broad inclusion of various
awareness-raising initiatives, have resulted in poor
coordination, inconsistent monitoring and a lack of
a cohesive strategy.
Fragmented MIL programmes
Fragmented efforts at monitoring and evaluating
MIL programmes, especially in the long term,
have reduced capacities to adapt MIL to new
risks posed by technological developments
and advancements in AI. It is crucial to evaluate
how incorporating MIL in formal and non-formal
education results in improved capacities to detect
mis- and disinformation online, to enhance digital
safety and to encourage participation in public
discourse. Further, it is essential to set standards,
ensuring quality control and adequate oversight of
the operations of civil society actors and partner
organizations implementing MIL initiatives.
National and regional MIL policies
It is vital that states develop national/regional MIL-
related policies, elaborate strategies to sustain
their efforts and allocate sufficient resources to
implement MIL. According to a UNESCO Platform
of Ibero-American Audiovisual Regulators (PRAI)
study, 63% of audiovisual regulatory bodies in
Ibero-America reported having a formal framework
for action that outlines the importance, benefits
and responsibilities related to MIL promotion and
dissemination, while only 37% reported having
resources or a budget earmarked specifically for
actions on MIL.30 In addition, the development and implementation of MIL policies must be
carried out in coordination with key stakeholders,
including regulatory authorities, media, civil society,
fact-checking and youth-led organizations and
educational institutions.
Adaptation and evolving initiatives
MIL initiatives must adapt and evolve as the
information environment changes. A major barrier
to successful MIL implementation is the lack of
adequately skilled and trained educators, especially
as digital platforms and media landscapes evolve
at an unprecedented pace. Further, development
of MIL strategies and curricula in the digital age
needs to draw from expertise in interdisciplinary
fields including education, journalism, psychology
and behavioural science, law and policy, computer
science and AI and cultural studies.
Beyond youth engagement
There is a growing need for MIL for adults,
especially in the digital age. Given the high drop-out
rates in lifelong learning contexts, short modules
on MIL, with a focus on practical skills, need
to be incorporated into professional training for
institutional staff and duty-bearers. In the future, MIL
should be a prerequisite for any job, ensuring that
individuals in such roles are equipped to navigate,
analyse and critically assess information effectively.
This approach will promote informed, ethical and
transparent decision-making across sectors.
Private-sector incentives
The private sector often lacks sufficient incentives
or regulatory pressure to collaborate in MIL
efforts, although many have made investments
in MIL on their platforms. It is imperative to work
with the private sector and technical community
(especially companies working on AI research and
development [R&D]) on designing and implementing
MIL programmes. This will serve to promote
transparency and accountability, which is necessary
for empowering users on digital platforms. 1.4 Opportunities, challenges and lessons learned
Rethinking Media Literacy: A New Ecosystem Model for Information Integrity
12
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: