Risk to Reward 2025
Page 29 of 52 · WEF_Risk_to_Reward_2025.pdf
Mobilizing domestic resources at scale is no longer
optional, given the risk of relying on external flows.
OECD data shows that monthly portfolio flows
to EMDEs remain volatile, with sharp outflows
during tightening cycles. High foreign currency
debt further amplifies vulnerability: in some lower-
income EMDEs, 40% of outstanding debt is foreign
currency-denominated, raising servicing costs
during depreciation episodes.
India’s recent experience highlights the potential for
domestic capital to stabilize markets and underpin
long-term investment. In 2025, India’s domestic
institutional investors (DIIs) overtook foreign
institutional investors (FIIs) in ownership and net
inflows.56 This structural shift has helped reduce
exposure to volatile external flows while creating a
more reliable capital base for financing long-term,
climate-aligned projects.
However, across most EMDEs, much of the available
domestic capital continues to concentrate in
sovereign debt markets, with domestic and foreign investors financing government borrowing rather than
directly mobilizing capital into productive climate-
aligned sectors. While sovereign issuance plays an
important role in building benchmarks, it does not
equate to the mobilization of institutional savings into
clean energy, infrastructure or resilience projects.
There is potential to unlock greater pools of local
capital for climate-aligned investments in Africa. For
example, one of Africa’s largest asset managers, the
Public Investment Corporation (PIC), has recently
committed capital to green hydrogen development
through a landmark investment partnership (see
Box 9). Research by Africa Finance Corporation
(AFC) estimates Africa’s domestic capital pools at
over $4 trillion, comprising $1.1 trillion in institutional
capital, $2.5 trillion in commercial banking assets
and more than $435 billion in external reserves.57
Of the climate finance tracked within Africa, 87%
originates from international sources. Domestic
contributions remain limited at just 10% of total
investment, with three-quarters of that amount
provided by private actors.58
$4 trillion opportunity to mobilize African capital FIGURE 12
Domestic contributions to climate finance in Africa remain limited at just 10% of total investment
Banking
Commercial banks $2,500 bn PDBs, $250 bnPensions,
$455 bnInsurance,
$320 bn
SWFs,
$150 bnFX,
$435 bnInstitutional/non-banking Reserves
Notes: PDBs = public development banks, SWFs = sovereign wealth funds, FX = foreign exchange, “non-banking” refers to financial entities that provide
banking services but do not hold a full banking licence (e.g. insurance companies, pension funds, hedge funds, private equity firms).
Source: Africa Finance Corporation (AFC).59
We underestimate the amount of local capital in Africa. I believe we’re in the midst
of a transition, where blended finance structures are attracting local capital into
intermediaries focused on earlier stage investment. Africa’s institutional investors,
high net-worth investors and family offices remain largely untapped for climate finance.
CJ Fonzi, Chief Operating Officer, Africa Climate VenturesMobilize local capital PRIORITY 3
From Risk to Reward: Unlocking Private Capital for Climate and Growth
29
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: