Shaping the AI Sandbox Ecosystem for the Intelligent Age 2025
Page 18 of 30 · WEF_Shaping_the_AI_Sandbox_Ecosystem_for_the_Intelligent_Age_2025.pdf
To be effective, an AI sandbox must begin with
a clearly defined objective – whether the focus is
enabling innovation, regulatory experimentation or a
hybrid approach.
–Clearly articulate the primary purpose:
innovation, regulation or hybrid – along with
specific end goals.
–Identify the scope, based on target sectors
and anchor use cases: for example, healthcare
diagnostics, MSME export compliance agents,
agri-input optimization tools, voice-first AI
agents for rural service delivery, autonomous
agri-drones, Sewa agents (AI-based virtual
assistants for accessing public schemes and entitlements) in rural India or AI-powered
warehouse robots.
–Map key stakeholders: government nodal
bodies (government agencies with primary
responsibility for sectoral implementation and
coordination), AI start-ups, domain experts and
infrastructure providers and potential adopters
(for example, public agencies).
Example: A sandbox for AI-enabled diagnostics
would involve India’s Central Drugs Standard
Control Organization (CDSCO),17 health
departments, AI health-tech start-ups and
medical institutions, enabling sector-aligned
validation and deployment.Define objectives and scope 4.3.1
A strong governance model builds credibility and
ensures trust in experimentation environments,
which is essential for secure, transparent and
inclusive AI sandbox environments. For research-
intensive sectors, participation also depends on
robust IP protection and clear data-ownership
norms. Sandboxes must support sector-specific
agreements, enable confidential computing
environments and maintain audit trails to safeguard
proprietary research and sensitive workflows.
This can be enabled by the following:
–Define access and participation/eligibility
criteria based on alignment with sectoral needs
or problem statements. Ensure selection criteria
are transparent and accessible, minimizing
bureaucratic hurdles such as excessive
paperwork. A single-window entry system with
modules linked to relevant government schemes
(e.g. Startup India, India AI Mission) can further
ease participation.
–Set up inclusive governance boards with
representation from ministries, legal and policy
experts in AI policy and AI risk management,
start-ups, industry, academia and civil society.
–Embed a localized responsible AI risk-
management framework, adapted from global standards such as the US government’s
National Institute of Standards and Technology
(NIST) AI Risk Management Framework (RMF),18
to systematically identify, document and
manage AI risks.
–Enable clear coordination protocols for
onboarding, stakeholder management and
conflict resolution. Inclusion of consumer
consent mechanisms, where applicable, can
improve trust, scale and innovation.
–Incorporate robust data-sharing and privacy
policies, modelled on frameworks such as
India’s Data Empowerment and Protection
Architecture (DEPA).19
–To enable secure multi-tenant data access,
adopt security approaches such as Zero Trust
architecture and confidential computing. Include
protocols for secure data destruction post-
usage, especially for sensitive sectors such as
healthcare.
Example: In an education sandbox, the inclusion
of edtech firms, relevant state departments and
the State Councils of Educational Research and
Training (SCERTs) would ensure that solutions are
aligned with ground-level educational needs and
policy pathways.Establish multistakeholder governance and access policies 4.3.2
Shaping the AI Sandbox Ecosystem for the Intelligent Age
18
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: