The Cost of Inaction 2024
Page 4 of 58 · WEF_The_Cost_of_Inaction_2024.pdf
Executive summary
Rising climate risks are already impacting the
global economy and the business case for
collective action is clear. Intensifying climate
events will cause significant economic costs in
the next two decades. However, climate inaction
could cost far more than global action, as climate
adaptation and mitigation investments could be
“repaid” five to six times in avoided losses and
damage in the long run.1
Physical risks of climate change are becoming
material for businesses, putting significant value
at risk and increasing potential opportunity costs
in the medium term. Under the current climate
trajectory, companies are becoming increasingly
exposed to both systemic risks arising from lower
global economic growth and individual physical
risks threatening supply chains and operations. For
unprepared businesses, individual physical risks
alone could put 5% to 25% of their 2050 EBITDA
at risk, depending on sector and geography, with
infrastructure-heavy sectors being most exposed.
The cascading effects of such losses would
ultimately disrupt communities, with impacts on jobs,
lives, livelihoods and the cost of goods and services.
Transition risks for businesses are also
significant. After a decade of very significant (albeit
insufficient) progress, ambitious climate action has
recently seen more public resistance, triggering
doubts about the pace of decarbonization and the
future course of climate policies. But as climate
change affects the life and wealth of people and
businesses more seriously, relying on the status
quo is a risky bet to make and businesses need to
prepare for a broader range of developments.
In a scenario of accelerating climate action,
unprepared companies risk significantly higher
cost pressure from carbon pricing or comparable
regulation, write-downs on their fossil asset base
and a much faster-than-expected demand decline
for fossil fuels and technologies. Under a “well below
2°C path”, the impact of carbon pricing alone could
create additional costs equivalent to 50% of EBITDA
in certain emission-intensive sectors. As capital
markets respond to long-term threats to future
performance, early signals of heightened transition
risks could affect company valuations well before
those risks fully materialize.Corporate inaction also comes at a cost: there
is a clear business case for adaptation and a
better case for mitigation than most might think.
Companies report that their current adaptation and
resilience investments could yield between $2 and
$19 for every dollar invested. On mitigation, while
full decarbonization across sectors comes at a cost,
sustainability leaders can still find cost-efficient ways
to reduce emissions in the short term. Addressing
these risks also informs companies how to navigate
the transition and adaptation opportunities and
develop innovative offerings fit for a warmer and
greener world.
Companies need to change the way they
manage climate risks and opportunities, as
outlined in the CEO Guidebook presented at the
end of this report. Climate-related incidents and
market shifts are hard to predict and discontinuous,
but have potentially high-impact consequences.
While many companies are aware of these risks,
most are insufficiently prepared:
–Climate risks and opportunities should be a
critical component of company strategy, guiding
risk management, financial, strategic and
operational decisions at all levels. Understanding
climate risks is key for maintaining business
resilience, unlocking opportunities and ensuring
a competitive edge.
–Businesses need to ramp up scenario thinking
to be prepared well ahead for both a 3°C world
and a future with accelerated decarbonization.
–Climate transition and resilience plans to
manage these risks should be informed by a
quantified assessment of underlying climate
risks across a range of scenarios.
–Capital allocation should match climate risk
strategy, balancing short-term profits with long-
term strategic resilience and optionality.
–Climate risk management should become part
of business-as-usual for all employees, as these
impacts are far reaching and likely to influence
many aspects of business operations.All companies will face a cost of climate
inaction: how their leadership prepares for
a warmer or greener world will determine
whether they thrive or fall behind.
The Cost of Inaction: A CEO Guide to Navigating Climate Risk
4
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: