The Global Risks Report 2024
Page 9 of 122 · WEF_The_Global_Risks_Report_2024.pdf
Over the longer term, developmental progress and
living standards are at risk. Economic, environmental and technological trends are likely to entrench existing challenges around labour and social mobility, blocking individuals from income and skilling opportunities, and therefore the ability to improve economic status (Chapter 2.5: End of development?). Lack of
economic opportunity is a top 10 risk over the two-year period, but is seemingly less of a concern for global decision-makers over the longer-term horizon, dropping to #11 (Figure E). High rates of job churn – both job creation and destruction – have the potential to result in deeply bifurcated labour markets between and within developed and developing economies. While the productivity benefits of these economic transitions should not be underestimated, manufacturing- or services-led export growth might no longer offer traditional pathways to greater prosperity for developing countries.
The narrowing of individual pathways to stable
livelihoods would also impact metrics of human development – from poverty to access to education and healthcare. Marked changes in the social contract as intergenerational mobility declines would radically reshape societal and political dynamics in both advanced and developing economies.Simmering geopolitical tensions
combined with technology will drive new security risks
As both a product and driver of state fragility,
Interstate armed conflict is a new entrant into the top risk rankings over the two-year horizon (Figure C). As the focus of major powers becomes stretched across multiple fronts, conflict contagion is a key concern (Chapter 1.4: Rise in conflict). There are several frozen conflicts at risk of heating up in the near term, due to spillover threats or growing state fragility.
This becomes an even more worrying risk in the
context of recent technological advances. In the absence of concerted collaboration, a globally fragmented approach to regulating frontier technologies is unlikely to prevent the spread of its most dangerous capabilities and, in fact, may encourage proliferation (Chapter 2.4: AI in charge). Over the longer-term, technological advances, including in generative AI, will enable a range of non-state and state actors to access a superhuman breadth of knowledge to conceptualize and develop new tools of disruption and conflict, from malware to biological weapons.
Censorship and surveillance
Adverse outcomes of
frontier technologies
Cyber insecurity
Adverse outcomesof AI technologiesTechnological powerconcentrationMisinformation and disinformationIntrastate violence
Terrorist attacksErosion of human rights
SocietalpolarizationInterstate armed conflict
Insufficient infrastructure and services
Lack of economic opportunity
Labour shortages
Geoeconomic confrontation
UnemploymentDebtInflation
Illicit economic activityInvoluntary migration
Infectious diseasesPollutionBiodiversity loss and
ecosystem collapseCritical change to
Earth systems
Extremeweather events
Chronic health conditions
Biological, chemical
or nuclear hazardsDisruptions tocritical infrastructureNon-weather related natural disastersNatural resource shortages
Concentration of
strategic resourcesDisruptions to a systemically
important supply chain
Economic downturn
Asset bubble burstsGlobal risks landscape: an interconnections map FIGURE D
Source
World Economic Forum Global RisksPerception Survey 2023-2024.Edges
Relative influence
High
LowMediumRisk influenceNodes
High
LowMedium
Risk categories Economic Environmental Geopolitical Societal Technological
Global Risks Report 2024
9
Ask AI what this page says about a topic: