Document text
3 of 3 Premium Clicks used this month SUBSCRIBE Print + Online Subscriber Activation | Register x Forgot Password | Need an Account? subscribe | newsletter | deals Classifieds Jobs Autos Real Estate FEATURED » NEWS NOW City moves to acquire 'Acid Rocks' lots ... ODOT to begin paving and cable work on I-5 ... Governor orders flags lowered to half-staff following Sen. Bates' death ... City moves to acquire 'Acid Rocks' lots ... ODOT to begin paving and cable work on I-5 ... Governor orders flags lowered to half-staff following Sen. Bates' death ... OUR VIEW Our View: Consider safety first DailyTidings.com Writer Posted Jul. 27, 2016 @ 12:01 am Posted Jul. 27, 2016 @ 12:01 am » Social News p bs:newslist StartDate="20121121" EndDate="p bs:datecalc Months="3"" DateSort="1" UseObjects="1" ObjectClass="81" Taxonomywords="2324,665" ExactTaxonomyMatch="1" Image="1" Count="4" --> City Administrator Dave Kanner framed the question of the Grandview guardrail exactly right last week: "Of the options you have presented, which provides the greatest measure of safety for the citizens of Ashland?" City Council members should do as he suggested and consider only that question. And they should answer by voting to leave the guardrail in place. Perhaps only in Ashland could a situation so unusual transpire: Property owners building a house on a previously vacant lot down a steep embankment from Grandview Drive grew concerned when they learned that two cars had plunged off the road an onto the property. One was stopped by a tree; the other would have struck their home had it existed at the time. So the couple paid to install a guardrail to keep errant vehicles from leaving the road above their house. This was no small project; city engineers said it cost between $20,000 and $30,000. The property owners did not obtain a permit from the city, and the guardrail is in the public right-of-way. But city engineers say it was installed correctly and is in the right place, despite complaints from one neighbor that it encroaches on pedestrians and cycllists, posing a safety hazard from passing traffic. The city is considering adding a buffer for walkers and bikers, which would address that concern. Meanwhile, it makes little sense to insist on removing a guardrail that increases safety to avoid setting a precedent for something that is fairly unlikely to happen again. DailyTidings.com Writer Posted Jul. 27, 2016 @ 12:01 am » Comment or view comments Terms of Service /* $( document ).ready(function() { // Jquery mobile is trying to style the button and leaving a blank gry button on top of a white button $("#viafouracoms .vf-comment-controls li.vf-right").html(' Submit '); });*/ » STAY INFORMED Email NewsLetter Sign Up Today Sign up for our newsletter and have the top headlines from your community delivered right to your inbox. calendar Connect with DailyTidings.com Facebook Twitter RSS Back to top Reader Services Reader Services home Subscriptions Subscriber controls Contact us Submissions Photos Events Letters to the editor Corrections Alerts Email alerts RSS feeds Text Alerts Advertise Media Kit Home Products and services Ad rates Advertising contacts Propel Marketing Mail Tribune Daily Tidings The Nickel Shop Our Valley Blogs Mobile Site Stay Informed Email newsletter Sign Up Today Sign up for our newsletter and have the top headlines from your community delivered right to your inbox. Your privacy is important, read our privacy policy. © Copyright 2016 Local Media Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Local Media Group Publications Original content available for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons license, except where noted. DailyTidings.com | P.O. Box 1108, Medford, OR 97501