Hagan v. FM Meats GP, Inc.

Survival, Water, Medical Field Manuals

Military Manuals

Document text

CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
MIDDLE  DISTRICT OF FLORIDA  
 
CASE NO: ______________________ 
 
KYLE HAGAN ,      
 Plaintiff,     
v.       
 
FM MEATS GP INC. ,   
 Defendant.     
                                                            / 
 
COMPLAINT 
 
COMES NOW, Plaintiff, KYLE HAGAN (“ HAGAN”) and sues Defendant, 
FM MEATS GP INC.  (“FM MEAT ”), for violation of the Americans with  
Disabilities Act,  (“ADA”) 42 USC §112101, the Florida Civil Rights Act of 1992, 
Fla. Stat. §760.01, et seq.  (“FCRA”) and retaliation in violation of the Flor ida 
Workers Compensation under Fla.  Stat. §440.205, (“WCA”) and alleges as 
follows:  
JURISDICTION & VENUE 
1. This is an action brought to remedy unlawful employment practices 
by FM MEAT  pursuant to the ADA, FCRA and WCA and this Court has federal 
question and supplemental jurisdiction pursuant to 28 USC §§1331 and 1365. 
2. HAGAN sui juris and is a resident of this Court’s jurisdiction. Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 1 of 15 PageID 1
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 2 3. FM MEAT  is a company incorporated in the State of Florida and 
employed HAGAN  in this jurisdiction.  
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS  
Employment 
4. HAGAN worked as an Industrial S uper visor at FM MEAT from 
June 2021 until November 8, 2023. 
5. At all times material hereto,  Corban Russell  was the  CEO of FM 
MEAT and had operational control over the work performed by HAGAN. 
6. At all times material hereto, John Wilson was the General Manager 
of FM MEAT and had operational control over the work performed by HAGAN. 
Disability Discrimination and Retaliation 
7. HAGAN suffered  an on-the -job injury to his knee and foot on Ju ne 
9, 2023.  
8. HAGAN informed FM MEAT about  his on-the-job injury and 
sought medical care.  
9. This disability impacted one or more of his daily functions, 
specifically: refrain from prolonged standing on his leg and that he be permitted to work in a seated position.  Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 2 of 15 PageID 2
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 3 10. At all time s relevant, HAGAN informed FM MEAT that he  required 
a reasonable job accommodation to perform his essential job junctions.  
11. HAGAN was also not to lift, push or do any pulling.  
12. At all relevant times,  FM MEAT  refused to accommodate HAGAN, 
by requiring HAGAN  to perform duties  that his restriction prohibit ed, such as 
being forced to climb up the side of a building, in order to work on  a 
refrigeration issue on the roof that was approximately 60 fee t high.  
13. This refrigeration issue could have been performed by a non -
disabled co-worker , rather than HAGAN.   
14. HAGAN , upon returning to work after his injury , experienced other 
forms of discrimination a nd retaliation , including but not limited to FM MEAT 
demand ing that he clean the floor after an ammonia leak, demands in the early 
morning or late at night to fix and repair problems by himself (work that would 
require more than one person to handle) and handling condensation issues.  
15. HAGAN’s phone calls to the front office were ignored which then 
required him to walk on  his injured leg from the back of the facility to the front 
to obtain updated information.   Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 3 of 15 PageID 3
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 4 16. Further, during the last two weeks of his employment, HAGAN  
received no emails and then his calls we nt unanswered, which again forced him 
to walk to the front office area in order to obtain information to perform his 
duties.  
17. HAGAN directly opposed FM MEAT’s  discriminatory actions  in not 
providing a reasonable job accommodation. 
18. HAGAN reported FM MEAT’s  discriminatory actions to  Corban 
Russell  and or John Wilson on multiple occasions . 
19. Finally, on November 8, 2023, HAGAN was forced to resign as it 
was no longer safe to work at FM MEAT , and due to FM ME AT’s complete 
failure to accommodate him.  
CONDITIONS PRECEDENT 
20. All conditions precedent has been satisfied or have been waived, 
including timely filing of a Charge of Discrimination.  
21. HAGAN filed with the EEOC and FCHR a Charge of Discrimination 
and Retaliation and over 180 days have elapsed and the Right -to-Sue Letter was 
issued on July 5, 2024. 
 Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 4 of 15 PageID 4
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 5 MOTIVATING FACTOR 
22. The adverse job actions taken by FM Meat against  HAGAN  were 
motivated by his  protected categories of disability or in retaliation for h is 
complaints , or assertion of his workers’ compensation rights. 
ATTORNEYS’ FEES 
23. Plaintiff has retained the undersigned counsel and has agreed to pay 
reasonable fees.  
COUNT I  
AGAINST FM MEAT  FOR DISCRIMINATION UNDER ADA 
 
24. HAGAN repeats and incorporates paragraph s 1 through 23, as 
though fully stated herein.  
25. By and through the course of conduct herein described, FM MEAT  
violated the ADA by discriminating against HAGAN  due to his knee and foot 
impairment , by denying him a reasonable job accommodation as part of the terms 
and conditions of employment, and constructively discharging him  because of the 
impairment.  
26. HAGAN has suffered and continues to suffer damages, including but 
not limited to loss of income, mental anguish, humiliation, anxiety, loss of 
enjoyment of life and embarrassment and loss of fringe benefits. Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 5 of 15 PageID 5
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 6 27.  FM MEAT  blatant, intentional and willful disregard of the ADA and 
its consequences for violations warrants punitive damages.  
WHEREFORE, as to Count I, Plaintiff, HAGAN , demands judgment in h is 
favor against Defendant, FM MEAT for violation of the ADA and seeks back pay, 
compensatory damages, reinstatement or front pay if not reinstated, interest, 
punitive damages, attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 USC §12101, and costs, and such 
other further relief that this Court deems just and equitable.  
COUNT II  
AGAINST FM MEAT  FOR HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT  
UNDER ADA  
 
28. HAGAN repeats and inc orporates paragraphs 1 through 23, as 
though fully stated herein.  
29. By and through the course of conduct herein described  FM MEAT  
through the conduct of Corban Russell  and other members of management 
harassed HAGAN  because of his knee and foot impairment  in violation of the 
ADA by subjecting HAGAN to perform duties that were prohibited due to his 
impairment , and refusing to accommodate him.  
30. FM MEAT ’s offensive harassment was, severe, offensive and 
discriminatory actions,  nor did he invite or solicit them through his own actions. Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 6 of 15 PageID 6
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 7 31. The offensive and discriminatory actions were so severe and 
pervasive that they altered the terms and conditions of HAGAN ’s employment, 
including causing HAGAN  extreme stress  and ultimately forced HAGAN to 
resign from FM MEAT.  
32. As a result of the hostile work environment, HAGAN  has suffered 
and continues to suffer damages, including but not limited to loss of income, 
mental anguish, humiliation, anxiety, loss of enjoyment of life and embarrassment 
and loss of fringe benefits.  
33.  FM MEAT  blatant, intentional and willful disregard of the ADA and 
its consequences for violations warrants punitive damages.  
WHEREFORE, as to Count II, Plaintiff, HAGAN , demands judgment in  his 
favor against Defendant, FM MEAT  for creation of a hostile work environment in 
violation of the ADA and seeks back pay, compensatory damages, reinstatement 
or front pay if not reinstated, interest, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees pursuant to 42 USC §12101, and costs, and such other further relief that this Court deems 
just and equitable.  
  Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 7 of 15 PageID 7
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 8 COUNT III 
AGAINST FM MEAT  FOR RETALIATION UNDER A DA 
 
34. HAGAN repeats and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 23, as 
though fully stated herein.  
35. By and through the course of conduct herein described, HAGAN 
opposed h is supervisor’s discrimination and creation of a hostile work 
environment that violated the ADA. 
36. FM MEAT  through the conduct of Corban Russell  and other members 
of management took adverse job actions against HAGAN  because of h is 
opposition to the discrimination and creation of a hostile work environment based 
upon or motivated by his  disability , by among other things, increasing scrutiny 
upon HAGAN  and subjecting HAGAN  to perform duties prohibited such as 
lifting, pushing and pulling.    
37. The retaliatory  actions were so severe and pervasive that they altered 
the terms and conditions of HAGAN ’s employment, including causing HAGAN  
extreme stress.  
38. As a result of the retaliation , HAGAN has suffered and continues to 
suffer damages, including but not limited to loss of income, mental anguish, Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 8 of 15 PageID 8
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 9 humiliation, anxiety, loss of enjoyment of life and embarrassment and loss of 
fringe benefits.  
39.  FM MEAT  blatant, intentional and willful disregard of the anti-
retaliation provisions of the ADA  and its consequences for violations warrants 
punitive damages.  
WHEREFORE, as to Count III, Plaintiff, HAGAN , demands judgment in h is 
favor against Defendant, FM MEAT  for retaliation in violation of the AD A and 
seeks back pay, compensatory damages, reinstatement or front pay if not reinstated, interest, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees  pursuant to 42 USC §12101, 
and costs, and such other further relief that this Court deems just and equitable.  
COUNT IV  
AGAINST FM MEAT  FOR DISCRIMINATION (DISABILITY) UNDER FCRA  
 
40. HAGAN repeats and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 23, as 
though fully stated herein.  
41. By and through the course of conduct herein described, FM MEAT  
violated the FCRA by discriminating against HAGAN  due to or motivated by his  
disability , denying him  equal terms and conditions of employment, and 
constructively firing him  because of h is disability  and related medical conditions. Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 9 of 15 PageID 9
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 10 42. HAGAN has suffered and continues to suffer damages, including but 
not limited to loss of income, mental anguish, humiliation, anxiety, loss of 
enjoyment of life and embarrassment and loss of fringe benefits. 
43.  FM MEAT  blatant, intentional and willful disregard of the ADA and 
its consequences for violations warrants punitive damages.  
WHEREFORE, as to Count I V, Plaintiff, HAGAN , demands judgment in her 
favor against Defendant, FM MEAT  for violation of the FCRA and seeks back pay, 
compensatory damages, reinstatement or front pay if not reinstated, interest, 
punitive damages, attorneys’ fees pursuant to Fla. Stat. §760.11, and costs, and 
such other further relief that this Court deems just and equitable.  
COUNT V  
AGAINST FM MEAT  FOR HOSTILE WORK ENVIRONMENT UNDER 
FCRA  
 
44. HAGAN repeats and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 23, as 
though fully stated herein.  
45. By and through the course of conduct herein described  FM MEAT  
through the conduct of Corban Russell  and other members of management 
harassed HAGAN because of or motivated by his  disability in violation of the Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 10 of 15 PageID 10
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 11 FCRA  by subjecting HAGAN  to offensive acts about his  disability and refusing to 
accommodate him.  
46. FM MEAT ’s harassment was severe, offensive and discriminatory 
actions, nor did he invite or solicit them through  his own actions. 
47. The offensive and discriminatory actions were so severe and 
pervasive that they altered the terms and conditions of HAGAN ’s employment, 
including causing HAGAN  extreme stress , and ultimately forced HAGAN to 
resign from FM MEAT.  
48. As a result of the hostile work environment, HAGAN  has suffered 
and continues to suffer damages, including but not limited to loss of income, 
mental anguish, humiliation, anxiety, loss of enjoyment of life and embarrassment 
and loss of fringe benefits.  
49.  FM MEAT  blatant, intentional and willful disregard of the FCRA and 
its consequences for violations warrant  punitive damages.  
WHEREFORE, as to Count V, Plaintiff, HAGAN , demands judgment in his  
favor against Defendant, FM MEAT  for creation of a hostile work environment in 
violation of the FCRA  and seeks back pay, compensatory damages, reinstatement 
or front pay if not reinstated, interest, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees pursuant Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 11 of 15 PageID 11
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 12 to Fla. Stat. §760.11, and costs, and such other further relief that this Court deems 
just and equitable.  
COUNT VI  
AGAINST FM MEAT  FOR RETALIATION UNDER FCRA  
 
50. HAGAN repeats and incorporates paragraphs 1 through 23, as 
though fully stated herein.  
51. By and through the course of conduct herein described, HAGAN 
opposed FM MEAT ’s disability  discrimination and creation of a hostile work 
environment that violated the FCRA.  
52. FM MEAT  through the conduct of Corban Russell  and other members 
of management took adverse job actions against HAGAN  because of his 
opposition to the discrimination and creation of a hostile work environment, by 
among other things, increasing scrutiny upon HAGAN  and subjecting HAGAN  
to perform duties prohibited such as lifting, pushing and pulling.   
53. The retaliatory actions were so severe and pervasive that they altered 
the terms and conditions of HAGAN ’s employment, including causing HAGAN  
extreme stress.  
54. As a result of the retaliation , HAGAN has suffered and continues to 
suffer damages, including but not limited to loss of income, mental anguish, Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 12 of 15 PageID 12
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 13 humiliation, anxiety, loss of enjoyment of life and embarrassment and loss of 
fringe benefits.  
55. FM MEAT ’s blatant, intentional and willful disregard of the anti -
retaliation provisions of the FCRA and its consequences for violations warrants punitive damages.  
 WHEREFORE, as to Count VI, Plaintiff, HAGAN , demands judgment in  his 
favor against Defendant, FM MEAT  for retaliation in violation of the FCRA and 
seeks back pay, compensatory damages, reinstatement or front pay if not 
reinstated, interest, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees pursuant to Fla. Stat. 
§760.11, and costs, and such other further relief that this Court deems just and 
equitable.  
COUNT VII  
AGAINST FM MEAT FOR RETALIATION UNDER WORKERS’ 
COMPENSATION ACT 
 
56. HAGAN repeats and incorporates paragraphs 1 through  18, and 22 
as though fully stated herein. 
57. HAGAN filed a workers compensation claim following his on- the-job 
injury.  Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 13 of 15 PageID 13
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 14 58. Fla. Stat. §440.205 states that “ [n]o employer shall discharge, threaten 
to discharge, intimidate, or coerce any employee by reason of such employee's 
valid claim for compensation or attempt to claim compensation under the 
Workers' Compensation Law.”   
59. FM MEAT constr uctively  discharged HAGAN by not providing a 
reasonable accommodation and requiring HAG AN to perform duties which he 
was prohibited from doing.  
60. A motivating factor that caused FM MEAT to coerce and intimidate 
HAGAN as described above was the request for workers compensation benefits 
pursuant to Fla. Stat. Chap. §440 et.  seq.  
61. FM MEAT’s coercion and intimidation of HAGAN was in direct 
violation and has caused Plaintiff to be damaged.   
62. FM MEAT’s conduct in wrongfully coercing and intimidating 
HAGAN was willful, wanton, and in reckless disregard of HAGAN’s rights and 
therefore HAGAN reserves the right to move for punitive damages as discovery 
progresses.  
 WHEREFORE, as to Count VII, Plaintiff, HAGAN , demands judgment in 
his favor against Defendant, FM MEAT  for retaliation in violation of Fla. Stat. Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 14 of 15 PageID 14
 
 
CADOGAN LAW |  300 S. PINE ISLAND ROAD, SUITE 107  PLANTATION , FL 33324   |  T: 954.606.5891   | WWW .CADOGAN LAW.COM 15 §440.205 and seeks back pay, compensatory damages, reinstatement or front pay 
if not reinstated, interest, punitive damages, and costs, and such other further 
relief that this Court deems just and equitable.  
JURY TRIAL DEMAND  
 Plaintiff, HAGAN  demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable. 
 
Dated : August 19, 2024.   Respectfully submitted,  
  
By: /s/ Gina Cadogan    
GINA MARIE CADOGAN  
Fla Bar No: 177350 
       ABHISHEK V. RAMASWAMI 
       Fla. Bar. 1031719 
       Cadogan Law 
       300 S. Pine Island Road, Suite 107 
       Plantation, Florida 33324 
       Telephone: 954.606.5891 
       Facsimile: 877.464.7316 
       Email: [email protected]   
Email: [email protected]  
Email: [email protected]   
 
 Case 3:24-cv-00849-TJC-SJH   Document 1   Filed 08/19/24   Page 15 of 15 PageID 15