Minimal Standards of Adequacy: A History of Health Care in US Prisons

NIH Pandemic-Era Grants

Pandemic Era Grants

2024

Document text

Principal Investigator: Jessica L. Adler
Organization: FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY
Fiscal Year: 2024
Award: $50,000
Funding agency: National Library of Medicine

PROJECT SUMMARY
 The disproportionate impact of covid-19 in U.S. jails and prisons offers stark evidence of a reality
rooted in history: the incarceration of more than two million people constitutes a public health catastrophe.
Mass incarceration threatens the well-being of communities and exacerbates health disparities. Inside of
prisons, incarcerated people face a variety of health challenges. They are more likely to have HIV/AIDS,
Hepatitis C, tuberculosis, and an array of common sexually transmitted diseases than their non-
incarcerated counterparts; over 40 percent of people in prisons have a chronic condition. Peer-reviewed
literature, news reports, and legal claims provide evidence of egregious shortfalls in prison medical
services. As increasing evidence emerges demonstrating that prison health care is inadequate, there
remains no comprehensive study of how this overwhelming contemporary health policy and humanitarian
crisis arose. Minimal Standards of Adequacy: A History of Health Care in U.S. Prisons explores how
incarcerated people, medical and corrections professionals, reformers, policy makers, and the courts
defined and perceived prison medical services during the past century. Building upon path-breaking work
about the health consequences of incarceration, about the history of prisons, and about how incarcerated
people endured and resisted being abused and exploited as medical research subjects, the book explores
questions related to so-called routine medical care. It begins in the 1920s and 1930s, when state-level
court cases and federal legislation related to prison hospitals highlighted confounding questions about
health-related rights and governmental obligations in carceral institutions. It explores the amorphous
standards that influenced prison-based care in the post-World War II years, and how incarcerated men
and women experienced medical services. Minimal Standards also assesses prison health activism,
paying special attention to its connection with the civil rights movement, and the 1976 Supreme Court
case, Estelle v. Gamble, which, building on state-level lawsuits, helped establish that people in prisons
have a constitutional right to health care. It shows that, in the wake of Estelle, professional organizations
like the American Medical Association and American Public Health Association articulated standards for
service provision even as prisons became more prevalent, more bureaucratized, more privatized, and
more openly punitive. The book ends with the recognition that more than forty years after Supreme Court
Justice John Paul Stevens maintained that the government must “provide the persons in its custody with a
health care system which meets minimal standards of adequacy,” major legal and ethical questions
regarding the medical rights of incarcerated people – and reports of abuses of those rights – abound.
Based on rigorous research in national, state, and local archives, Minimal Standards offers insights about
legal, medical, policy, and prison history, and perspective on the roots of a modern public health calamity.

Terms: <2nd World War><AIDS/HIV><APHA><Abuse Reporting><Advocate><American Medical Association><American Public Health Association><Archives><Articulation><Attention><Books><COVID crisis><COVID epidemic><COVID pandemic><COVID-19><COVID-19 affected><COVID-19 consequence><COVID-19 crisis><COVID-19 effect><COVID-19 epidemic><COVID-19 era><COVID-19 global health crisis><COVID-19 global pandemic><COVID-19 health crisis><COVID-19 impact><COVID-19 impacted><COVID-19 pandemic><COVID-19 period><COVID-19 public health crisis><COVID-19 years><CV-19><Caring><Chronic><Civil Rights><Collaborations><Comment><Commentary><Communities><Complex><Complex thinking><Conceptions><Constitution><Coronavirus Infectious Disease 2019><Country><Critical Thinking><Data><Development><Editorial Comment><Ethics><Evaluative Thinking><Face><Gambling><Government><Group Meetings><HCV infection><HIV/AIDS><Health><Health Care Systems><Health Policy><Health Services><Healthcare><Healthcare Systems><Hepatitis C><Hepatitis C virus infection><Hepatitis, Viral, Non-A, Non-B, Parenterally-Transmitted><Hepatitus C><History><Hospitals><Imprisonment><Institution><Interdisciplinary Research><Interdisciplinary Study><Investigators><Jail><Justice><Legal><Legislation><Length><Letters><Literature><M tuberculosis infection><M. tb infection><M. tuberculosis infection><M.tb infection><M.tuberculosis infection><MTB infection><Medical><Medical Research><Medicine><Mental disorders><Mental health disorders><Modernization><Movement><Multidisciplinary Collaboration><Multidisciplinary Research><Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) infection><Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection><Nature><Peer Review><Penetration><Personal Satisfaction><Persons><Policies><Policy Maker><Population><Prisons><Privatization><Productivity><Professional Organizations><Psychiatric Disease><Psychiatric Disorder><Public Health><Published Comment><Publishing><Reader><Recording of previous events><Reporting><Research><Research Personnel><Research Subjects><Researchers><Review Literature><Rights><SARS-CoV-2 epidemic><SARS-CoV-2 global health crisis><SARS-CoV-2 global pandemic><SARS-CoV-2 pandemic><SARS-coronavirus-2 epidemic><SARS-coronavirus-2 pandemic><Science><Second World War><Service provision><Services><Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoV 2 epidemic><Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoV 2 pandemic><Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 epidemic><Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 pandemic><Sexually Transmitted Diseases><Sexually Transmitted Disorder><Sexually Transmitted Infection><Shapes><Source><Statutes and Laws><TB infection><Time><Tuberculosis><United States><Variant><Variation><Venereal Diseases><Venereal Disorders><Venereal Infections><Viewpoint><Woman><Work><World War II><access to health care><access to healthcare><accessibility of health care><accessibility to health care><accessibility to healthcare><body movement><coronavirus disease 2019><coronavirus disease 2019 consequence><coronavirus disease 2019 crisis><coronavirus disease 2019 effect><coronavirus disease 2019 epidemic><coronavirus disease 2019 global health crisis><coronavirus disease 2019 global pandemic><coronavirus disease 2019 health crisis><coronavirus disease 2019 impact><coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic><coronavirus disease 2019 public health crisis><coronavirus disease crisis><coronavirus disease epidemic><coronavirus disease pandemic><coronavirus disease-19><coronavirus disease-19 global pandemic><coronavirus disease-19 impact><coronavirus disease-19 pandemic><coronavirus infectious disease-19><court><developmental><diaries><disparity in health><disseminated TB><disseminated tuberculosis><ethical><expectation><experience><faces><facial><health care><health care access><health care availability><health care policy><health care service access><health care service availability><health disparity><healthcare access><healthcare accessibility><healthcare availability><healthcare policy><healthcare service access><healthcare service availability><hep C><hepatitis non A non B><histories><improved><incarcerated><incarceration><infection by hepatitis c virus><infection due to Mycobacterium tuberculosis><insight><marginalized group><marginalized individual><marginalized people><marginalized population><men><mental illness><news><non A, non B hepatitis><non-A, non-B hepatitis><professional association><professional membership><professional society><programs><psychiatric illness><psychological disorder><severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 global health crisis><severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 global pandemic><sexually acquired infection><social movement><trend><tuberculosis infection><tuberculous spondyloarthropathy><well-being><wellbeing>