19736 S0243 smsr 01feb2021 28feb2021

Pfizer Documents (PHMPT/FDA)

Pfizer Bla Submission

Pfizer 16 Plus Documents

3409

Document text

PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 1SUMMARY MONTHLY SAFETY REPORT 3
for
ACTIVE SUBSTANCE: PF-07302048 (BNT162b2)
ATC CODE: J07BX 031
AUTHORISATION PROCEDURE in the EU: Centralised
INTERNATIONAL BIRTH DATE (IBD):219 December 2020
EUROPEAN UNION REFERENCE DATE (EURD): 21 December 2020
INTERVAL COVERED BY THIS REPORT:
01 FEBRUARY 2021 through 28 FEBRUARY 2021
DATE OF THIS REPORT: 12MARCH 2021
Report Prepared by: Worldwide Medical & Safety
Pfizer-BioNTech
The information contained in this document is proprietary and confidential. Any disclosure, reproduction, distribution, or 
other dissemination of this information outside of Pfizer and BioNTech , their Affiliates, their Licensees, or Regulatory 
Agencies is stri ctly prohibited. Except as may be otherwise agreed to in writing, by accepting or reviewing these materials, 
you agree to hold such information in confidence and not to disclose it to others (except where required by applicable law), 
nor to use it for unau thorized purposes.
                                                
1Temporary ATC code.
2It corresponds to the earliest conditional approval date.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081181
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 2EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This is the 3rdSummary  Monthly  Safet y Report (SMSR) for PF-07302048 [Coronavirus 
disease 2019 (COVID -19) mRNA Vaccine, hereafter referred to as BNT162b2) ], covering 
thereporting interval 01February  2021 through 28 February  2021 .  
BNT162b2 is a white to off -white frozen dispersion (pH: 6.9 - 7.9), provided as concentrate 
for dispersion for injection (sterile concentrate) as multidose vial to be diluted before use. 
The multidose vial contains 6 doses of 0.3 mL  after dilution ; low dead -volume sy ringes 
and/or needles should be used in order to extract 6 doses from a single vial. The low 
dead -volume s yringe and needle combination should have a dead volume of no more than 35 
microlitres. If standard sy ringes and needles a re used, there may  not be sufficient volume to 
extract a sixth dose from a single vial. Each dose contains 30 micrograms of BNT162b2 
embedded in lipid nanoparticle s(LNPs ). The vaccine also contains 
(4-hydroxybutyl)azanediy l)bis(hexane -6,1-diyl)bis(2 -hexyldecanoate) (ALC -0315), 2-
[(poly ethylene gl ycol) -2000] -N,N-ditetradecy lacetamide (ALC -0159), 1,2 -Distearo yl-sn-
glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), cholesterol, potassium chloride, potassium dihy drogen 
phosphate, sodium chloride, disodium hydrogen phosphate dih ydrate, sucrose and water for 
injections as excipients.
BNT162b2 is highly  purified single -stranded, 5’ -capped mRNA produced using a cell- free in 
vitro transcription from the corresponding DNA templates, encoding the viral spike (S) 
protein of severe acute respiratory  syndrome coronavirus 2 ( SARS -CoV -2). The nucleoside -
modified mRNA is formulated in L NPs, which enable delivery  of the RNA into host cells to 
allow expression of the SARS- CoV -2 S antigen. The vaccine elicits both neutralizing 
antibody  and cellular immune responses to the spike (S) antigen, which may  contribute to 
protection against COVID-19.
BNT162b2 is indicated for active immunisation to prevent COVID -19 caused by  
SARS -CoV -2 virus, in individuals 16 years of age and older. No dosage adjustment is 
required in elderl y individuals ≥65 y ears of age. It is administered intramuscularly in the 
deltoid muscle after dilution as a series of 2 doses (0.3 mL  each) at greater than or equal to 
21 day s(prefer ably 3 weeks) apart. 
It is estimated that approximately 126,212,580doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide 
from the receipt of the first temporary  authorisation for emergency  suppl y on 
01December 2020 through 28 February 2021 and that approximately  59,939,685doses of 
BNT162b2 were shipped worl dwide during the current reporting interval from 
01February 2021through 28 February 2021. 
BNT162b2 has received temporary  authori sation for emergency  suppl y in28 countries and 
conditional marketing authorisation approval in 39 c ountries globally . 
The RSI for this SMSR is the BNT162b2 CDS Version 1.0, dated 12 February  2021, in effect 
at the end of the reporting period. After the data -lock point of this SMSR , on 02 March 2021, 
the CDS was updated with the following safet y-related changes: Diarrhoea, Pai n in extremity  
(arm) and Vomiting were added as adverse reactions in Section 4.8 Undesirable effects.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081182
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 3During the reporting period, the following safet y topics and signals were addressed:
Diarrhoea was evaluated and was added to the RSI as an adverse reaction;*
Vomiting was evaluated and was added to the RSI as an adverse reaction;*
Delay ed syncope was evaluated and determined not to be a risk;
Eye pain and Ey e swelling were evaluated and determined not to be risks;
Hearing loss and Tinnitus wereevaluated a nd determined not to be risks;
Dizziness was evaluat ed and subsequentl y subsumed in an evaluation of vaccine 
stress --related responses that is ongoing ;
Immune thrombocy topenia was evaluated and determined not to be a risk;
Facial paral ysis was evaluated and determined not to be a risk at this time; but will be re-
evaluated once final safety  data from the Study  C4591001 is available in mid
-April 2021;
Herpes Zoster evaluation is ongoing;
Paraesthesia and Dy saesthesia were evaluated subsequently  subsumed in an evaluation of 
vaccine stress- related responses that is ongoing ;
Tach ycardia was subsumed in an evaluation of vaccine stress- related responses that is 
ongoing ;
Guillain -Barre s yndrome was a safet y topic determined not to be a validated signal ;
Myocarditis and pericarditis were safety  topic sdetermined not to be a validated signal;
Severe cutaneous adverse reactions were safety  topic sdetermined not to be a validated 
signal .
*Diarrhoea and Vomiting were determined as identified risks (not important for the purpose 
of inclusion in the Risk Management Plans and Pharmacovigilance Plans) ; the related events 
were added as adverse reactions to the RSIafter the data -lock point of this SMSR , on 
02March 2021 .
Based on the new safet y and efficacy /effectiveness data from the reporting interval for 
BNT162b2, the benefit -risk profile of BNT162b2 remains favorable.  
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081183
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 4TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................ ................................ ................................ .......2
LIST OF TABLES ................................ ................................ ................................ ..................... 5
LIST OF FIGURES ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 5
APPENDI CES ................................ ................................ ................................ ........................... 6
LIST OF ABBREVIATION S................................ ................................ ................................ ....8
1. INTRODUCTION ................................ ................................ ................................ ............... 10
2. WORLDWIDE APPRO VAL OR AUTHORI SATION STATUS ................................ ......11
3. ACTIONS TAKEN IN THE REPORTING INTERV AL FOR SAFETY REASON S ....... 11
4. CHANGES TO REFERENCE SAFETY INFORMATI ON................................ ............... 11
5. ESTI MATED EXPOSUR E AND USE PATTERNS ................................ .......................... 11
5.1. Cumulative and I nterval Exposure Data ................................ ................................ .11
6. DATA IN SUMMARY T ABU LATIONS ................................ ................................ ........... 14
6.1. Reference Information ................................ ................................ ............................. 14
6.2. Cumulative and I nterval Summary  Tabulations from Post -Marketing Data 
Sources ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 15
7. MEDI CATION ERRORS ................................ ................................ ................................ ....17
8. GENERAL OVERVIEW ................................ ................................ ................................ .....25
9. SI GNAL AND RISK E VALUATION ................................ ................................ ................ 43
9.1. L iterature Review ................................ ................................ ................................ ....43
9.2. Overv iew of Signals During the Reporting Interval ................................ ............... 43
9.3. Summary  of Safet y Concerns ................................ ................................ .................. 44
9.4. Summary  of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) ................................ .......45
9.5. Evaluation of Safet y Concerns ................................ ................................ ................ 45
9.5.1. Evaluation of Important Identified and Important Potentia l Risks ............. 45
9.5.2. Evaluation of AESIs ................................ ................................ ................... 53
9.5.3. Evaluation of Special Situations ................................ ................................ .65
9.5.4. Evaluation of Missing Information ................................ ............................. 70
10. OVERALL BENEFIT- RISK EVALUATION ................................ ................................ ..76
10.1. Benefits ................................ ................................ ................................ .................. 76
10.2. Risks ................................ ................................ ................................ ...................... 77
10.3. Overall Benefit- Risk ................................ ................................ ............................. 78
11. CO NCL USION AND ACTIONS................................ ................................ ...................... 78
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081184
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 5LIST OF TABLES
Table 1. List of SMSRs ................................ ................................ ................................ .......10
Table 2. Cumulative Estimated Shipped Doses of BNT162b2 by  Region Worldwide ......12
Table 3. Interval Estimated Shipped Doses of BNT162b2 by Region Worldwide ............ 13
Table 4. Interval/Cumulative Estimated Shipped Doses of BNT162b2 b y EU 
Countries (30) ................................ ................................ ................................ .......14
Table 5. General Overview: Selected Characteristics of All Cases Received During 
the Reporting Interval ................................ ................................ ........................... 25
Table 6. Events Reported in ≥2%* Cases ................................ ................................ ......... 31
Table 7. Overview of Signals ................................ ................................ ............................. 43
Table 8. Safety  Concerns ................................ ................................ ................................ ....44
Table 9. Risks Evaluation for BNT162b2 ................................ ................................ .......... 45
Table 10. AESI s Evaluation for BNT162b2................................ ................................ ......... 53
Table 11. Evaluation of Special Situations for BNT162b2 ................................ .................. 65
Table 12. Evaluation of Missing Information for BNT162b2 ................................ .............. 70
Table 13. Vaccine efficacy  –First COVID -19 occurrence from 7 day s after Dose 2, 
by age subgroup – participants without evidence of infection prior to 7 
days after Dose 2 – evaluable efficacy  (7days) population ................................ .76
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1. Case Outcome b y Presence of Relevant Comorbidities ................................ .......26
Figure 2. Case Outcome b y Presence of Relevant Comorbidities, Gender and Age 
Group ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 27
Figure 3. Fatal Case Outcome b y Presence of Relevant Comorbidities and Age 
Group ................................ ................................ ................................ .................... 29
Figure 4. General Overview: Total Number of Events by  MedDRA SOC and Event 
Seriousness ................................ ................................ ................................ ........... 30
Figure 5. Events Reported in ≥2%Cases in the Interval Period by  Gender ...................... 33
Figure 6. PTReported in ≥2% in the I nterval Period -by SOC and Age Group ............... 34
Figure 7. Events Reported in ≥2% in the Interval Period by  Age Group within 
Gender ................................ ................................ ................................ ................... 41
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081185
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 6APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1 REFERENCE INFORMATIO N (CDS 12 FEBRUARY 202 1) ........................79
APPENDIX 2 INTERVAL  NUMBER OF CASE REPOR TS [(SERIOUS AND NON -
SERI OUS, MEDICALLY C ONFIRMED AND NON -MED ICALLY CONFIRMED) 
FROM POST-MARKETING DATA SOURCES, OVERALL, BY SEX, COUNTRY, 
AGE GROUPS AND IN SPECIAL POPUL ATIONS ] AND SUMMARY TABULA TION 
BY PREFERRED TERM AN D MEDDRA SYSTEM ORGA N CLASS .........................99
APPENDIX 2.1 CUMULAT IVE NUMBER OF CASE R EPORTS [(SERIOUS AND NON-
SERI OUS, MEDICALLY C ONFIRMED AND NON -MED ICALLY CONFIRMED) 
FROM POST-MARKETING DATA SOURCES, OVERALL, BY SEX, CO UNTRY, 
AGE GROUPS AND IN SP ECIAL POPULATIONS ] AND SUMMARY TABULA TION 
BY PREFERRED TERM AN D MEDDRA SYSTEM ORGA N CLASS ........................155
APPENDIX 2.2 INTERVA L SUMMARY TABULATION OF CASE REPORTS WI TH DME 
EVENTS FROM POST -MAR KETING DATA SOURCES ................................ ........... 219
APPENDIX 2.3 CUMULAT IVE AND INTERVAL  SUMMARY TAB ULAT ION OF 
SERI OUS AND NON -SERI OUS CASE REPORTS FRO M POST -MARKETING DATA 
SOURCES BY MEDI CAL LYCONFI RMED AND NON -MEDICALLY CONFIRMED, 
REGION AND COUNTRY ................................ ................................ .............................222
APPENDIX 2.4 CUMULAT IVE AND INTERVAL  SUM MARY TABULATION OF F ATAL 
CASE REPORTS FROM POST -MARKETING DATA SOURCES BY COUNTRY
................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ ......... 228
APPENDIX 2.5 CUMULAT IVE AND INTERVAL  SUM MARY TABULATION OF 
SERI OUS AND NON -SERI OUS ADVERSE REACTION S FROM POST- MARKETIN G 
DATA SOURCES ORGANIZED PER MEDDRA SYSTEM ORGAN CLASS BY 
PREFERRED TERM ................................ ................................ ................................ ........ 230
APPENDIX 2.5.1 CUMUL ATIVE AND INTERVAL SU MMARY TABULATION OF 
SERI OUS AND NON -SERI OUS ADVERSE REACTION S FROM POST- MARKETIN G 
DATA SOURCES ORGANIZED PER MEDDRA SYSTEM ORGAN CLASS BY 
PREFERRED TERM PER C OUNTRY ................................ ................................ ........... 322
APPENDIX 2.5.2 CUMULATIVE AND INTERVAL SUMMARY TABULAT ION OF 
SERI OUS A ND NON -SERI OUS ADVER SE REACTIONS FROM PO ST-MARKETING 
DATA SOURCES ORGANIZED PER AGE GROUP BY PREFERRED TERM P ER 
COUNTRY ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................1008
APPENDIX 2.5.3 CUMULATIVE AND INTERVAL SUMMARY TABULAT ION OF 
SERI OUS AND NON -SERI OUS ADVERSE REACTION S FROM POST- MARKETIN G 
DATA SOURCES ORGANIZED PER GENDER BY PREFERRED TERM PER 
COUNTRY ................................ ................................ ................................ ......................1939
APPENDIX 2.5.4 CUMULATIVE AND INTERVAL SUMMARY TABULAT ION OF 
SERI OUS AND NON -SERI OUS ADVERSE REACTION S FROM POST- MARKETIN G 
DATA SOURCES ORGANIZED PER PATIENTS WI TH RELEVA NT CO -
MORBIDIT IES BY PREFERRED TERM PER COUNTRY ................................ ......... 2600
APPENDIX 2.6 CUMULAT IVE AND INTERVAL  SUM MARY TABULATION OF 
SERI OUS AND NON -SERI OUS ADVERSE REACTION S FROM POST- MARKETIN G 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081186
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 7DATA SOURCES ORGANIZED PER MEDDRA SYSTEM ORGAN CLASS BY HIGH
LEVE L TERM ................................ ................................ ................................ ................2818
APPENDIX 2.6.1 CUMUL ATIVE AND INTERVAL S UMMARY TABULATION OF 
SERI OUS AND NON -SERI OUS ADVERSE REACTION S FROM POST- MARKETIN G 
DATA SOURCES ORGANIZED PER MEDDRA SYSTEM ORGAN CLASS BY HIGH
LEVE L TERM PER COUNTRY ................................ ................................ ................... 2854
APPENDIX 3 TABULAR S UMMARY OF SAFETY TOPI CS AND SIGNAL SEVALUATED 
DURING THE REPORTING PERIOD ................................ ................................ .........3327
APPENDIX 3.1 SUMMARY OF SAFETY TO PICS AND SI GNAL EVALUATIONS .......3324
APPENDIX 3. 2 SAFETY EVALUATION OF IMMUNE THROMBOCYT OPENIA
................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .......3336
APPENDIX 3. 3 SAFETY EVALUATION OF HEARING LOSS AND TI NNITUS
................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .......3343
APPENDIX 3. 4 SAFETY EVALUATION OF INSOMNIA ................................ ................. .3349
APPENDIX 3. 5 SAFETY EVALUAT ION OF DIZZIN ESS ................................................ .3351
APPENDIX 3. 6 SAFETY EVALUATION OF GUILLAIN -BARRE’ SYN DROME ........... 3356
APPENDIX 4 CUMULATIV E APPROVAL/AUTHORI SATION STATUS ....................... 3378
APPENDIX 5 LIST OF A DVERSE EVENTS OF SPECIAL INTEREST ............................ 3383
APPENDIX 5.1 OBSERVE D VERSUS EXPECTED AN ALYSIS FOR ADVERSE E VENTS 
OF SPECI AL INTEREST ................................ ................................ .............................. 3392
APPENDIX 6 LITERATUR E REVI EW IN THE REPO RTING PERIOD (METHOD OLOGY)
................................ ................................ ................................ ................................ .......3409
APPENDIX 6.1 LITERATURE REVIEW IN THE REPORTI NG PERIOD (RETR IEVED 
RESUL TS)................................................................ ................................ ........ NO DATA
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081187
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 8LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Acronym Term
AE adverse event
AESI adverse event of special interest
BC Brighton Collaboration
BMI body  mass index
CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
CDS core data sheet
CI confidence interval
COPD chronic obstructive pulmonary  disease
COVAX COVID -19 Vaccines Global Access
COVID -19 coronavirus disease 2019
DLP data lock point
DME designed medicall y event
DNA deox yribonucleic acid
DSPC Distearo yl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
EEA European Economic Area
EMA European Medicines Agency
EU European Union
EUA emergency  use authori sation
EURD European Union Reference Date
HC Health Canada
HCP healthcare professional
HLGT (MedDRA ) High Group Level Term
HLT (MedDRA) High Level Term
HPRC Health Product Risk Communication
IBD international birth date
ICH International Conference on Harmonisation
LNP lipid nanoparticle
MAH marketing authorisation holder
MedDRA medical dictionary  for regulatory  activities
MHRA Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory  Agency
mRNA messenger ribonucleic acid
NAAT nucleic acid amplification tests  
PCR Polymerase Chain Reaction
PI prescribing information
PRAC Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee
PT (MedDRA) Preferred Term
PVP pharmacovigilance plan
RMP risk management plan
RNA ribonucleic acid
ROW rest of world
RT-PCR Reverse Transcription -Polymerase Chain Reaction
RSI reference safet y information
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081188
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 9Acronym Term
TME targeted medically  event
SAE serious adverse event
SARS -CoV -2 severe acute respiratory  syndrome coronavirus 2
SmPC Summary  of Product Characteristics
SMQ standardised MedDRA query
SMSR summary  monthl y safety report
SOC (MedDRA) S ystem Organ Class
UK United Kingdom
US United States
VAED vaccine -associated enhanced disease
VAERD vaccine -associated enhanced respiratory  disease
VAERS vaccine adverse event reporting s ystem
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081189
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 101.INTRODUCTION
This is the 3rdSMSR for PF-07302048 ( COVID -19 mRNA Vaccine , hereafter referred to as 
BNT162b2), covering the reporting interval 01 February  2021 through 28 February  2021 .  
The format and content of this SMSR is in accordance with the EMA coreRMP19 Guidance 
(EMA/544966/2020 ) and,as applicable , with ICH Guideline E2C (R2) Periodic Benefit -Risk 
Evaluation Report [Step 5, January  2013] considering the informatio nfortheevidence from 
post-EUA /conditional marketing authorisation approval data sources .
BNT162b2 is a white to off -white frozen dispersion (pH: 6.9 - 7.9), provided as concentrate 
for dispersion for injection (sterile concentrate) as multidose vial to be dilute d before use. 
The multidose vial contains 6doses of 0.3 mL  after dilution ; low dead -volume sy ringes 
and/or needles should be used in order to extract 6 doses from a single vial. The low dead -
volume sy ringe and needle combination should have a dead volume of no more than 35 
microlitres. If standard sy ringes and needles are used, there may  not be sufficient volume to 
extract a sixth dose from a single vial. E achdose contains 30 micrograms of BNT162b2 
(embedded in LNPs ). The vaccine also contains ( (4-hydroxy butyl)azanedi yl)bis(hexane -6,1-
diyl)bis(2- hexy ldecanoate) (ALC -0315), 2- [(polyethy lene gl ycol) -2000]- N,N-
ditetradecy lacetamide (ALC -0159), 1,2 -Distearoy l-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine (DSPC), 
cholesterol, potassium chloride, potassium dihy drogen phosphate, s odium chloride, disodium 
hydrogen phosphate dih ydrate, sucrose and water for injections as excipients.
BNT162b2 is highly  purified single -stranded, 5’ -capped mRNA produced using a cell -free in 
vitro transcription from the corresponding DNA templates, encoding the viral spike (S) 
protein of SAR S-CoV -2.The nucleoside -modified mRNA is formulated in LNPs, which 
enable delivery  of the RNA into host cells to allow expression of the SARS- CoV -2 S antigen. 
Thevaccine elicits both neutralizing antibod y and cel lular immune responses to the spike (S) 
antigen, which may contribute to protection against COVI D-19.
BNT162b2 is indicated for active immunisation to prevent COVID -19 caused by  
SARS -CoV -2 virus, in individuals 16 y ears of age and older. No dosage adjustme nt is 
required in elderl y individuals ≥65 y ears of age. It is administered intramuscularly in the 
deltoid muscle after dilution as a series of 2 doses (0.3 mL  each) at greater than or equal to 
21 day s(preferabl y 3 weeks) apart. 
Pfizer is responsible for the preparation of the SMSR on behalf of the MAH BioNTech 
according to the Pharmacovigilance Agreement in place . Data from BioNTech will be 
included in the report when applicable.
A complete list of the finalized SMSRs is provided in Table 1below.
Table1.List of SMSRs
SMSR Number Reporting Period
1 01 December 2020 Through 31 December 2020
2 01 January 2021Through 31 January 2021
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081190
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 112.WORLDWIDE APPROVAL OR AUTHORISATION STATUS
BNT162b2 received first temporary  authori sation for emergency  suppl yunder regulation 174
in the UK on 01 December 2020 and is currentl y authorised for emergency  use in 28
countries.  
BNT162b2 received first regulatory  conditional marketing authorisation approval in 
Switzerland on 19 December 2020 and is currently  conditionall y approved in 39countries .  
Details of the current authori sation/ approval status are presented in Appendix 4 .  
3.ACTIONS TAKEN IN THE REPO RTING INTERVAL FOR S AFETY REASONS
On 05 February  2021 H ealth Canada requested to issue a joint Pfizer -Health C anada Health 
Product R isk Communication to communicate revisions to Product Monograph (addition of 
6-dose vial information and text on anaphy laxis). Final HPRC was approved on 08 February  
2021.
There were no withdrawals for safety  reasons during the reporting interval.
4. CHANGES TO REFERENCE SAFETY INFORMATION
The RSI for this SMSR is the BNT162b2 CDS Version 1.0, dated 12 February  2021, in effect 
at the end of the reporting period which is located in Appendix 1 .
After the data -lock point of this SMSR, on 02 March 2021, the CDS was updated with the 
following saf ety-related changes made: Diarrhoea, Pain in extremity  (arm) and Vomiting 
were added as adverse reactions from post -authorisation experience in Section 4.8 
Undesirable effects .
5.ESTIMATED EXPOSURE AND USE PATTERNS
5.1. Cumulative and Interval Exposure Data
It is not possible to determine with certaint y the number of individuals who received 
BNT162b2 during the period of this review. Estimated worldwide shipped doses may serve 
as a reasonable indicator of subject exposure .
With these caveats in mind, it is es timated that :
approximately  126,212,580 doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide from the 
receipt of the first temporary  authorisation for emergency  suppl y on 01December 2020 
through 28February  2021 ;
approximately  59,939,685doses of BNT162b2 were shipped worldwide during the 
current reporting interval from 01 February 2021 through 28 February  2021. 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081191
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 12The estimated cumulative number of shipped doses of BNT162b2 by region3based on data 
provided in the shipment tracker 4from the re ceipt of the first temporary  
authorisation for emergency  suppl y on 01 December 2020 through 28 February  2021 , are 
summarized in Table 2.
Table 2.Cumulative Estimated Shipped Doses of BNT162b2 by Region Worldwide
Region/Country/Other % of Doses Total Number of Shipped 
Doses
Europe
European Uniona(27)
European Free Trade Associationa(3) 
Switzerlanda
UKb
Other Countries
Commonwealth of Independent Statesc
North Am ericab
US
Canada
Central and South Americad
Asia
Japana
Other Countriese
Oceania
Australia/New Zealanda
Other Countries
Africa
Total 100.0% 126212580
a. I n this Region BNT162b2 was conditionally approved;
b. I n this Region BNT162b2 received authorisation for emergency supply;
c.Includes: Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, 
Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan ;
d.In this Region BNT162 received authorisation for emergency supply; in Colombia B NT162b2 is also 
shipped for COVAX;
e.In this Region BNT162b2 received authorization for emergency supply , except for South Korea w here 
BN6162b2 is shipped for COVA X.
                                                
3Currently there are no available data that allow  to estimate exposure by gender andage group .
4The  is the most accurate tracker of shipment used as data source for all the Regions and 
Countries; US shipment data not available in the  w ere taken from the  
.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081192
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 13The estimated interval number of shipped doses of BNT162b2  b y region5based on data 
provided in the shipment tracker 6from 01 February 2021 through 
28February 2021 , are summarized in Table 3.
Table 3.Interval Estimated Shipped Doses of BNT162b2 by Region Worldwide
Region/Country/Other % of Doses Total Number of Shipped 
Doses
Europe
European Uniona(27)
European Free Trade Associationa(3) 
Switzerlanda
UKb
Other Countries
Commonwealth of Independent Statesc
North Am ericab
US
Canada
Central and South Americad
Asia
Japana
Other Countrie se
Oceania
Australia/New Zealanda
Other Countries
Africa
Total 100.0% 59939685
a. I n this Region BNT162b2 was conditionally approved;
b. I n this Region BNT162b2 received authorisation for emergency supply;
c.Includes: Armenia, Azerbai jan, Belarus, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Russia, Tajikistan, 
Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan ;
d.In this Region BNT162 received authorisation for emergency supply; in Colombia BNT162b2 is also 
shipped for COVAX;
e.In this Region BNT162b2 received authorization for emergency supply, except for South Korea w here 
BN6162b2 is shipped for COVAX .
Table 4 provides the estimated interval/cumulative number of shipped doses of BNT162b2 
from the receipt of the first conditional marketing authorisation approval through 
28 February  2021 for the 27 European Countries and for the 3 of the European Free Trade 
Association.
                                                
5Currently there were no available data that a llow to estimate exposure by gender andage group .
6The  is the most accurate tracker of shipment used as data source for all the Regions and 
Countries; US shipment data not available in the  w ere taken from the  
.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
(b) (4)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081193
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 14Table 4.Interval/Cumulative Estimated Shipped Doses of BNT162b2 by EU 
Countries (30)
EU Country Total Number of Interval Shipped 
DosesTotal Number of Cumulative Shipped 
Doses
European Union 
(27)
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
Germ any
Greece
Hungary
Ireland
Italy
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Rom ania
Slovakia
Slovenia
Spain
Sweden
European Free 
Trade Association
Iceland
Liechtenstein
Norw ay
Total
6.DATA IN SUMMARY TABU LATIONS
6.1.Reference Information
The MedDRA version 23.1 wasused to code adverse events /reactions in summary  
tabulations.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
(b) (4)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081194
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 156.2.Cumulative and Interval Summary Tabulations from Post -Marketing Data 
Sources7
As per EMA PRAC assessment report (Product No. EMEA/H/C/005735/MEA/002 .1) 
received on the second SMSR (01 Jan 2021 to 31 Jan 2021) , the MAH should specify the last 
date that EudraVigilance data were accessed for the purposes of preparing future SMSR.
Cases from EudraVigilance are downloaded with a 3- day delay , therefore for example cases 
with a Eudravigilance availability  date of 28 February  2021 were accessed and downloaded 
on 03 March 2021 . However ,among cases received or downloaded during the reporting 
period, only  those having a complete workflow cycle in the safety  database (meaning they  
progressed to Distribution or Closed workflow status) areincluded in that month’s SMSR . 
This approach prevent s the inclusion of cases that are not full y processed hence not 
accuratel y reflect ingfinal data. Each month, Pfizer applies a Late condition process that 
retrieves cases received in the previous reporting period /sbut not included in that mo nth’s 
SMSR due to lack of completeness , in order to include them in the current SMSR, therefore 
ensuring that no cases are excluded from inclusion in the S MSR s.
Appendix 2 and Appendix 2.1 respectively provide interval and cumulative number sof 
case reports (serious and non- serious, medicall y confirmed and non- medically  confirmed) 
received from post -marketing authoris ation data sources,7overall, b y sex, country , age 
groups and in special populations, and summary  tabulations of events by  PT and SOC 
respectivel y for the interval and cumulative periods. 
The cumulative data i nclude all data up to 28February 2021 while the interval data are
for the peri od from 01 February  2021 to 28February 2021 .  
Appendix 2 .2provide san interval summary  tabulation of case reports with DMEs from 
post-marketing data sources .7
Appendices 2.3 and2.4provide data stratified by  country . In these appendices,
spontaneous cases (including regulatory  authorit y and literature cases) are presented 
separately  from non-interventional cases :
oAppendix 2.3 provides a cumulative and interval summary tabulation of case sby
medically  confirmed and non -medicall y confirmed status (fatal, serious and non -
serious).
oAppendix 2 .4provide sa cumulative and interval summary  tabulation of fatal cases. 
Appendix 2.58and Appendix 2.6 provide a cumulative and interval summary tabulation 
of adverse reactions from post- marketing authori sation data sources7respectively  by PT
                                                
7This refers to post-EUA/conditional marketing authorisation approval data sources.
8Due to a technical formatting issue, 1 blank page (92) appears in this Appendix; the total data are 
however correctly displayed.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081195
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 16and by  HLT organized according to SOC. Please refer to Appendix 2.5.19and 
Appendix 2.6.1 for data per country . 
Adverse events totals presented in Appendix 2 , Appendix 2.1 and for safety topic evaluations 
in Section 9.5may differ from those presented in Appendix 2.5 and Appendix 2.6, due to the 
fact that Appendix 2.5 and Appendix 2.6 only display  the number of serious and non- serious 
reactions from spontaneous sources, serious reactions from non- interventional studies and 
from solicited sources as described above, whereas Appendix 2 , Appendix 2.1 and the safety  
topic evaluation s includes all reported events. 
Appendix 2.5.2,10Appendix 2. 5.311and Appendix 2 .5.4were added to include a cumulative 
and interval summary  tabulation of adverse events from post -authori sation data sources7by 
PT per country , stratified respectively for age, gender and relevant co -morbidities. 
Available relevant information with regard to the differences in vaccination prioritization in 
EU countries,12US13, UK and ROW14was taken into account in the evaluation of adverse 
events trends, clusters or signals .
                                                
9Due to a technical formatting iss ue, 8 blank pages (154, 164, 200, 277, 531, 656, 672 and 686) appear in 
this Appendix; the total data are how ever correctly displayed.
10Due to a technical formatting issue, 5 blank pages (1 42, 316, 785,801 and 931 ) appear in this 
Appendix; the total data are how ever correctly displayed.
11Due to a technical formatting issue, 2 blank pages ( 68 and 177) appear in this Appendix; the total data 
are how ever correctly displayed.
12Overview of the implementation of COVID -19 vaccination strategies and vaccine dep loyment plans in 
the EU/EEA . ECDC, February 2021.
13https:// www.cdc.gov/vaccines/hcp/acip -recs/vacc- specific/covid -19/evidence -table -phase -1b-1c.html .
14WHO Roadmap for Prioritizing Population Groups for Vaccines against COVID -19; ACIP COVID -19 
Vaccines Working Group, Phased Allocation of COVID -19 Vaccines (Dec 01, 2020); JCVI updated interim 
advice on priority groups for COVID -19 vaccination (Sept 25, 2020)
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081196
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 177.MEDICATION ERRORS
Cases potentially  indicative of medication errors15that occurred in the reporting period are 
summarized below.
Number of cas es: 858 (3.6% of 23,558 cases, the total PM7dataset ) of which 644 
(75.1%) are medically  confirmed, compared to 872 ( 6%)in the second monthly  report of 
which 74.5% were medically  confirmed). Out of the 858 cases, 13 cases describing 
medication errors occurr ing in an unspecified number of individuals, and 3 additional 
cases, describing medication errors occurr ingwith co -suspects were determined to be 
non-contributory  and are not included in the discussion.
Number of relevant medication e rror cases : 842
Number of relevant even ts: 1189 .
Number of medication errors b y country : 
There were 393 cases describing medication errors, which occurred in the EU/EEA 
countries [France (139), Czech Republic (87), Germany  (50), Italy  (25), Finland (21),
Portugal (18), Sweden (10), Austria (8), Greece, Spain and Poland (5 each), Norway  
and Denmark (4 each), Romania (3), Belgium, Croatia and Slovakia (2 each), 
Lithuania, Slovenia and Ireland (1 each)]. 
There were 449cases with medication errors from other countries [US (332 ), UK 
(67), Canada ( 16), Puerto Rico (12), Chile (7), Mexico ( 4), Israel ( 3), Switzerland and 
Norther Mariana islands (2 each), Angola, Costa Rica, Oman, Saudi Arabia (1 each) ].
                                                
15MedDRA (version 23.1) Higher Level Term s: Accidental exposures to product; Product administration 
errors and issues; Product confusion errors and issues; Product dispensing errors and issues; Product label 
issues; Product monitoring errors and issues; Product preparation errors and issues; Product selection errors and 
issues; Product sto rage errors and issues in the product use system; Product transcribing errors and 
communication issues , OR Preferred Terms: Accidental poisoning; Circumstance or information capable of 
leading to device use error; Circumstance or information capable of leading to medication error; 
Contraindicated device used; Deprescribing error; Device use error; Dose calculation error; Drug titration error; 
Expired device used; Exposure via direct contact; Exposure via eye contact; Exposure via mucosa; Exposure via 
skin c ontact; Failure of child resistant product closure; Inadequate aseptic technique in use of product; Incorrect 
disposal of product; Intercepted medication error; Intercepted product prescribing error; Medication error; 
Multiple use of single -use product; Pr oduct advertising issue; Product distribution issue; Product prescribing 
error; Product prescribing issue; Product substitution error; Product temperature excursion issue; Product use in 
unapproved therapeutic environment; Radiation underdose; Underdose; U nintentional medical device removal; 
Unintentional use for unapproved indication; Vaccination error; Wrong device used; Wrong dosage form; 
Wrong dosage formulation; Wrong dose; Wrong drug; Wrong patient; Wrong product procured; Wrong product 
stored; Wrong rate; Wrong route; Wrong schedule; Wrong strength; Wrong technique in device usage process; 
Wrong technique in product usage process.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081197
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 18In some instances, clusters of medication errors wer e reported, generally  by HCP s, 
suggesting that rather than a sy stematic issue worldwide, these errors were repeated 
mistakes at certain vaccination locales:
In the EU/EEA region there were 11 clusters, the largest in France (96 cases), 
Czech Republic (83 c ases), German y (25 cases) and in Finland (12 cases);
In other countries there were 19 clusters, the largest in US (14 cases), Puerto Rico 
(10 cases) ,Chile (7 cases) and in Canada (2 cases). 
Medication error PTs in the EU and ex -EU16
In the EU/EEA countries, a total of 652 PTs indicative of medication errors were 
reported; those events reported at least thrice included: Poor quality  product 
administered (243), Product temperature excursion issue (141), Product preparation 
error (96), Incorrect route of product administration (69), Inappropriate schedule of 
product administration (25), Underdose (22), Product preparation issue (21), Product 
administered at inappropriate site (9), Wrong technique in product usage process (7), 
Incorrect dose administered (5) and Circumstance or information capable of leading 
to medication error (3).17
In other countries, a total of 537 medication errors were reported; those events
reported at least thrice included: Inappropriate schedule of product administr ation 
(173), Underdose (53), Poor quality  product administered (51), Product administered 
to patient of inappropriate age (37), Incorrect route of product administration (31), 
Product temperature excursion issue (24), Circumstance or information capable of
leading to medication error (22), Product preparation error (18), Product administered 
at inappropriate site, Product preparation issue, and Wrong technique in product 
usage process (14 each), Accidental exposure to product (13), Exposure via skin 
contact (12), Incomplete course of vaccination (11), Accidental overdose and Wrong 
product administered (8 each), Incorrect dose administered (7), Incorrect dosage 
administered (5), Product dose omission issue and Product administration error (4 
each), Product st orage error (3).
                                                
16As per EMA assessment received on the first SMSR, the MAH was requested to should keep 
medication errors under close scr utiny especially within the EU context and discuss whether the current product 
information is sufficiently clear or whether there is room for improvement. The Rapporteurs should be notified 
immediately in case of unexpected findings or trends.
17The PTs re ported less than 3 times included: Accidental overdose and Medication error (2 each) and 
Accidental exposure to product, Exposure via skin contact, Intercepted product preparation error, Lack of 
vaccination site rotation, Product administered to patient of inappropriate age, Product administration error and 
Transcription medication error (1 each).
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081198
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 19Medication error sby seriousness:
Serious (24); out of these, 12 serious medication errors18were reported in EU/EEA 
countries [Croatia, France, German y, Lithuania and Romania (2 each), and Denmark 
and I taly (1 each)].
Seriousness criteri a were hospitalization and disability  or permanent damage (1 event 
each) and important medical events (10 events); all but 1 event were medically  
confirmed.
Non-serious (1165 ).
Medication error case outcome s:
Fatal ( 5)19(cross -ref with Section 9.5.3 , Death ),
Resolved/resolving (167, of which 85 are serious), 
Resolved with sequelae (3, of which 2 are serious)
Not resolved (90, of which 58 are serious), 
Unknown (577, of which 21 are serious). 
Medication Err ors Harm Analysis
Among the medication error cases, the following scenarios , categorized according to the 
EMA guidance “Good practice guide on recording, coding, reporting and assessment of
medication errors” (EMA/762563/2014) were described :
Medication errors associated with harm [i.e., resulting in adverse reaction (s)] were 
reported in 1720cases (15in the second SMSR) ;
                                                
18PTs: Incorrect route of product administration (3), Accidental overdose, Inappropriate schedule of 
product administration, Incorrect dose administered, Incorrect route of product administration, Lack of 
vaccination site rotation, Poor quality product administered, Product administration error, Product preparation 
issue, Product temperature excursion issue, Underdose (1 each).
19As per EMA PRAC assessment report (Product No. EMEA/H/C/005735/MEA/002.1) , MAH should 
provide details regarding the fatal cases of medication errors and more clearly indicate whether or not the 
medication error caused or contributed to serious adverse event or outcome. All the medic ation errors reported 
in these cases were assessed as non -serious occurrences with an unknown outcome; based on the available 
information including the causes of death, the relationship betw een the medication error and the death is weak.
20Two cases reported both medication errors w ith harm and without harm.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081199
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 20Medication errors without harm [i.e. not resulting in adverse reaction(s)]21were 
reported in 774 cases (in 321 of them there were co -reported AEs) compared to 713 
cases of which 288 included co -reported AEs in the second SMSR;
Intercepted medication errors were reported in 2 cases, compared to 2 cases in the 
second SMSR;
Potentia l medication errors were reported in 51 cases, compared to 106 cases in the 
second SMSR.
Medication errors associated with harm (21 medication errors in 17cases)
There were 8 cases from the EU/EEA area [Sweden (4), France (2), Germany  and Italy (1 
each)] and 9 from non- EU/EEA countries [US (7), UK (2)].  
Serious medication errors
In 4 cases ( involving 5 medication error events), serious medication errors potentially  
contribut edto the occurrence of serious adverse events.
Seizure, Circulatory  collapse, Tachy cardia, Loss of consciousness, Presyncope, Somatic 
symptom disorder, F acial paral ysis, Hypotension, Vertigo, and P araesthesia occurred ina 
30-year-old woman 15 minutes after she received a dose of vaccine exposed to 
temperature excursion (PTs Product temperature excursion issue, Poor quality  product 
administered). No antiepileptics treatment were administered since “s eizure self -limited 
once the woman was in flat position with legs lifted ”. The events seizure, paraesthesia, 
facial paral ysis, circulator y collapse, tach ycardia, and unconsciousness resolved after 
treatment including fluid and electrol yte replacement solution and paracetamol ; the 
outcome was unknow nfor the remaining events (cross -reference with Section 9.5.2 ).
Myositis, Vaccination sitepain, N euralgic amyotrophy and Backpain were reported in a 
52-year-old man after receiving the vaccine (PT Lack of vaccination site rotation). The 
events were con sidered complications from vaccine absorption by  the allerg yand 
toxicolog y specialists. The events (except vaccination site pain) were resolving after 
treatment at the time of the report.
Pain/arthralgia accompanied by  nausea and paraesthesia occurred to a 51-year-old 
woman after she received the vaccine intramuscularly  towards the humeral head and not 
in the deltoid muscle (PT Product administration error); the events were resolving after 
treatment.
The vaccine was administered 2 cm below the deltoid musc le (PT Product administered 
at inappropriate site) inan adult woman who experienced “constantl y itching scabbing 
                                                
21AEs may be co -reported in a case, but they are not considered to be a result of the medication error.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081200
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 21over granulating and oozing 6 weeks post injection”. The outcome of the events was 
unknown.
Non-serious medication errors
In 13 cases ( involving 16 medication error events), non- serious medication errors potentiall y
contribut edto the occurrence of non-serious adverse events.
Administration of undiluted vaccine (2 events, 1 case)
A 41 -year-old woman experienced anal incontinence the night after she received a dose 
of undiluted vaccine.  The subject recovered the following day ; it was unknown if 
treatment was given.
Errors in the route of administration (11 events, 10 cases)
This error occurred in 5 cases in the EU/EEA area (4 from Sweden and 1 from France) 
and in 5 US cases. The vaccine was administered subcutaneousl y (6 events); “not 
intramuscularl y”(3 events), and through other routes (IV, oral, 2 events). Local 
vaccination site reactions mainly  included ery thema, swelling, pruritus, and warmth and 
pain.
Errors of vaccination at the wrong anatomical site (3 events, 3 cases)
This error occurred in 3 cases (from the US). The vaccination was not administered in the 
deltoid (PT Product administered at inappropriate site).  Vaccination site erythema and 
Pain in extremity  (2 each), Skeletal injury  and Contusion (1 each) were reported.
Medication errors without harm20(1113 medication errors in 774 cases)
These m edication error PTs describe errors occurring during 1 or more steps of the 
vaccination process: preparation, administration, or scheduling of seco nd dose.
Overall, t here were 
381 cases from the EU/EEA area [France (137), Czech Republic (86), Germany  (49), 
Italy (24), Finland (21), Portugal (18), Austria (8), Sweden (6), Greece and Poland (5 
each), Denmark and Spain (4 each), Norway  and Romania (3 each), Belgium, Croatia and 
Slovakia (2 each), Lithuania and Slovenia (1 each)] and 
393 from non-EU/EEA countries [those with more than 1 medication error included the 
US (285), the UK (64), Canada (14), Puerto Rico (12), Chile (7), Mexico (3) Northe rn 
Mariana Islands, Israel and Switzerland (2 each)].  
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081201
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 22Vaccine preparation errors (320 events, 2 of which were serious) : events mainly  described 
errors in storage conditions orduring dilution (before use ).
oTemperature excursion (167 events) : in the majority  of the events, the vaccine was left 
at room temperature or in the refrigerator for a longer time than specified in the RSI ; no 
adverse events were reported upon vaccine administration.
oIncorrect dilution (1 38events): Dilution was performed either with a sm aller volume of 
normal saline (8 events), or with a larger volume of normal saline (6 events) than 
instructed ; dilution with improper volume was reported with a variable total number of 
available doses after dilution from a single vial (15 events). There were 97 events of 
dilution performed with a different solvent (water for injection for 96 events) rather than 
normal saline . In another 12 events the vaccine was administered without performing the 
dilution ; no adverse events were reported upon vaccine administration.
oOther preparation errors (15 events ).
Vaccine administration errors (793 events, 17 of which were serious) : events mainly  
described errors in administration of vaccine dose not adequatel y prepared (see Preparation 
subset), errors in the volume or dosage of the vaccine administered, errors in administering 
the second dose in less than 21 day s or after m ore than 21 day s, and errors in route of 
administration.
oAdministration after inadequate preparation (294 events, all non -serious) : these events 
referred to vaccine administered after inadequate preparation: dilution performed with 
water for injection instead of normal saline (95 events); vaccine administered incorrect 
thawing procedure (left at room temperature for a longer time than the one specified in 
the RSI ), or thawed and inadvertentl y refrozen (166 events); and other 33 errors including 
presence of particulates [single black particles (4), small white floating particles (2), 
piece of latex (1) and another not further detailed particle (1)] after vaccine 
administration. 
oIncorrect interval between doses (148 events, 2 of which serious22): the second do se of 
the vaccine was administered at less than 21 day s of interval (98 events); interval 
between the first and the second dose ranged between 0 day  (3 events) and 18 day s, with 
the majority  of the second doses administered between the 15thand the 18thday after the 
first dose (51 events); the second dose was administered after more than 21 day s (50 
events).
                                                
22PTs Inappropriate schedule of product administration (2), Asthenia, Chills, COV ID-19, Diarrhoea, Drug 
ineffective, Fatigue, Headache, Lymphadenopathy, Nausea, Off label use, Pain, Pyrexia, Vomiting (1 each) .
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081202
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 23oErrors in the route of administration (93 events, of which 4 serious23): the vaccine was 
administered subcutaneously  (55 events)24; intravenously  (14 ev ents), parenterall y 
without any  further detail (9 events); and through other routes (15 events).
oErrors in the volume administered (78 events, of which 3 serious25): partial doses were 
administered due to leakage, s yringe or needle malfunction ( 74events); higher volume of 
right dose of vaccine was administered ( 4events).
oPaediatric Individuals <16 Years of Age (38 events, of which 3 serious26):the vaccine 
was inadvertently administered to paediatric individuals below 16 years (see
Section 9.5.4 Use in Paediatric Individuals <16 Years of Age).27
oDose of vaccine not administered (33 events, of which 1serious28): the second dose was 
not administered at the scheduled date.  In 15 instances, the dose was not administered 
either because the vaccinees were recovering from AEs occurred after first dose or they  
became COVID -19 positive or due to the impossibility  to attend at the scheduled date; 
only saline was injected or the sy ringe was empty (2 each); in the remaining instances the 
second dose was not administered for not further detailed causes (14 events). 
oAccidental exposure to vaccine (27 events, all non- serious) : all involved skin exposure.
oErrors in vaccine dosage (25 events, of which 2 serious) : these errors include 
administration of vaccine at higher concentration s(10 events) and at lower 
concentration s(6 event s) than recommended and 7 events in which the vaccine was 
administered undiluted ora third dose was administered (2 events, 1 case).
oVaccination site other than deltoid muscle (20 events, of which 1 serious29): the vaccine 
was administered in the vaccinee’ s arm but not in the deltoid muscle (14 events); the 
                                                
23PTs Chills, Deep vein thrombosis, Drug ineffective, Erythema, Fatigue, Feeling abnormal, Feeling hot, 
Feeling of body temperature change, Gait disturbance, Headache, Hyperaemia, Lymphadenopathy, Malaise, 
Myalgia, Pain in extremity, Rash pruritic, Suspected COVID -19, Vaccination site discolouration, Vaccination 
site pain, Vaccination site thrombosis .
24In 1 case route w as reporte d as partly subcutaneous and partly intramuscular.
25PTs Accidental overdose and Product administration error (2 each), Cough, Fatigue, Headache, 
Incorrect dose administered, Malaise, Pain in extremity, Pyrexia, Underdose, Vaccination site pain (1 each).
26PTs Headache (3), Product administered to patient of inappropriate age (3), Pyrexia and Pain in 
extremity (2 each) , Arthralgia, Back pain, Chills, Mastitis, Myalgia, Peripheral sw elling, Swelling, Vertigo and 
Wheezing (1 each).
27Out of these 38 cases, 1 8 were not further detailed in Section 9.5.4 as reporting information wasnot 
consistent for paediatric subjects (e.g. age category of adult or medical history and medications clearly for 
adults) .
28PTs Product dose omission issue, Drug ineffective, COVID -19.
29PTs Neurological symptom, Neuralgic amyotrophy, Pain in extremity, Paraesthesia, Joint dislocation, 
Chest discomfort, Pain, Wrong technique in product usage process .
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081203
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 24administration site was in the leg, thigh or in the gluteus (4 events), in the hand  and in 
the abdomen (1 event each). 
oWrong vaccine administered (10 events, all non -serious): the vaccinees received one 
dose of Moderna vaccine and 1 dose of BioNTech -Pfizer vaccine (8 events); in 2 
instances the vaccinees were told to receive one dose of Moderna vaccine, but the 
vaccination card reported the BioNTech -Pfizer vaccine was administered.
oOther vaccine adminis tration errors (28 events, of which 1 serious30): the majority  of the 
events were indicative of issues with sy ringes and needles or related to the use of 
concomitant drugs31(7 events each); expired vaccine (3events32) and not further detailed 
in the 11 remaining one s.
Intercepted medication errors ( 2medication errors in 2 cases)
There were 2 cases of which 1 was from the EU/EEA area (Norway ) and 1 from non-
EU/EEA countries (US).
In the first case a woman of unknown age who had received her first dose in the morning, 
was called in the afternoon of the same day for the second dose because her last name was 
misspelt; her second dose was rescheduled.  In the second case, a physician prepared a 
syringe with a double amount of vaccine; the dose was not adminis tered. 
Potential medication errors (53 medication errors in 51 cases)
There were 3 cases from the EU/EEA area [Czech Republic, Ireland and Spain (1 each)] and 
50 from non- EU/EEA countries [US (43), Canada (2) and 1 case each from I srael, Mexico, 
Oman, Saudi Arabia and the UK].  
Potential dosing interval error (53 events, all non -serious) : events mainl y described 
potential errors in the scheduling for the second dose not according to the 21 days 
interval. In some instances, the scheduled date for the secon d dose is planned at 4 weeks 
interval; in other instances, the planned date was scheduled at a different interval for 
vaccine unavailability  or for individual unavailability .
Some medication errors are expected to occur despite written instructions and edu cational 
activities for HCPs administering the vaccine. The number and seriousness of the reported 
medication errors do not indicate aneed for additional mitigation activity .
                                                
30PTsHeadache, Pyrexia, Fatigue, Vaccination site pain, Cough, Malaise, Pain in extremity, Incorrect 
dose administered , Underdose (1 each).
31Co-suspect in 1 instance.
32Three events (in 2 cases) described administration of the vaccine after its expiry date; in the first case, 
the vaccine was administered 5 days after the expiry date; no information was available for the second case. 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081204
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 258.GENERAL OVERVIEW
A total of 23,558 case reports (13,389medicall y confirmed and 10,169 non- medicall y 
confirmed) containing 91,934 events fulfilled criteria for inclusion in this SMSR. Refer to 
Appendix 2 for the summary tabulations of all cases received during the current reporting 
period.  
PRESENTATION OF CASE CHARACTERISTICS 
Table5. General Overview: Selected Characteristics of All Cases Received During 
the Reporting Interval
Characteristics Relevant cases ( N=23558)
Gender: Female 17040
Male 5317
No Data 1201
Age range (years):
0.06 -107years
Mean = 52.6 years
n= 2043317
18-30
31-50
51-64
65-74
³75
Unknown91a
2654
7579
4526
2234
3544
2927b
Case outcome: Resolved/Resolving 11729
Resolve d with sequelae 329
Not re solved at the time of report 6403
Fatal 798
Unknown 4299
Presence of relevant 
comorbiditiesYes 4953c
No 18605
a.Including 27 cases for which a paediatric age w as initially reported but that they re -evaluated as not 
consistent with this age upon review (see Table 12, Use in Paediatric Individuals <16 Years of Age) and 17 
breastfed babies for which paediatric age w as reported;
b.Including 14 breastfed babies for which age was not reported;
c.Cases retrieved applying the criteria in place to identify the reports involving the special populations of 
Immunocompromised patients, Patien ts with autoimmune or inflammatory disorders, Frail patients with co -
morbidities (e.g. COPD, diabetes, chronic neurological disease, cardiovascular disorders) described as 
Missing Information in Table 12.One of these cases was made invalid hence excluded from the discussion in 
Table 12below .
Case outcome b y age group, gender and presence of relevant comorbidities is presented in 
Figure 1, Figure 2and Figure 3. Across all age groups, there were more females than males
reporting adverse events .The fatal cases reported m orecomorbidities , but this is expected 
considering that the majority  of fatal outcomes occurred in patients 75 years and older as 
shown in Figure 2-B(please also see Death inTable 11and Frail patients with 
co-morbidities e.g. COPD, diabetes, chronic neurological disease, cardiovascular disorders,
described as Missing Information in Table 12).
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081205
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 26Figure1.Case Outcome by Presence of Relevant Comorbidities
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081206
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 27Figure2.Case Outcome by Presence of Rel evant Comorbidities ,Gender and Age 
Group
A. Case Outcom e by Presence of Relevant Com orbidities and Gender
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081207
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 28B. Outcom e by Presence of Relevant Com orbidities and Age Group
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081208
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report ( SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 29Figure3.Fatal Case Outcome by Presence of Relevant Comorbidities and Age Group 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081209
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 30ADVERSE EVENT DATA
As shown in Figure 4, the MedDRA SOCs containing the greatest number of events ( ≥2%) 
were General disorders and administration site conditions ( 28,420 ),Nervous sy stem 
disorders ( 15,446 ), Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders ( 9872 ), Gastrointestinal 
disorders ( 8274 ), Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders (4919 ), Respiratory , thoracic and
mediastinal disorders ( 5574 ),Infections and inf estations ( 2879), Injury , poisoning and 
procedural complications (2722), Investigations ( 2120) andCardiac disorders (1918) . Of 
note, multiple adverse events may be reported in a single case.
Figure4. General Overview: Total Number of Events by MedDRA SOC and Event 
Seriousness
The overall safet y evaluation includes a review of the most frequentl y reported events b y 
SOC and by  the PT for events reported in (≥2%) of all cases during the reporting interval as 
compared to the cumulative period since the first temporary authorisation for emergency  
supply  on 01 December 2020 .050001000015000200002500030000
General disorders
Nervous system
Musculoskeletal
Gastrointestinal
Respiratory
Skin
Infections
Injury/procedural complications
Investigations
Cardiac
Vascular
Psychiatric
Blood & lymphatic
Eye
Immune
Ear & labyrinth
Metabolism & nutrition
Renal & urinary
Reproductive & breast
Product issues
Social circumstances
Hepatobiliary
Neoplasms
Pregnancy
Endocrine
Congenital & genetic
Surgical & medical procedures NONSERIOUS
 SERIOUS
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081210
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 31Table6.Events Reported in ≥2%*Cases 
01 February 2021 Through 
28 February 2021Cumulatively Through 28 
February 2021
MedDRA SOC
    MedDRA PTAEs (AERP%)
N = 23558AEs (AERP%)
N = 42086
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathya 1101 (4.67%) 1972 (4.69%)
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia 713 (3.03%) 1098 (2.61%)
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nauseaa 2946 (12.51%) 5182 (12.31%)
Diarrhoeab 1132 (4.81%) 1880 (4.47%)
Vom itingb 1037 (4.40%) 1698 (4.03%)
General disorders and administration site conditions
Pyrexiaa 4272 (18.13%) 7666 (18.22%)
Fatiguea 4226 (17.94%) 7338 (17.44%)
Chillsa 2899 (12.31%) 5514 (13.10%)
Vaccination site paina 2584 (10.97%) 5181 (12.31%)
Paina 1825 (7.75%) 3691 (8. 77%)
Malaisea 1697 (7.20%) 2897 (6.88%)
Astheniaa 1549 (6.58%) 2285 (5.43%)
Drug ineffectivec 1032 (4.38%) 2201 (5.23%)
Chest pain 475 (2.02%) 722 (1.72%)
Vaccination site erythemaa 471 (2.00%) 930 (2.21%)
Infections and infestations
COVID -19c 1092 (4.64%) 1927 (4.58%)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Off label usec 508 (2.16%) 880 (2.09%)
Product use issuec 474 (2.01%) 828 (1.97%)
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgiaa 2903 (12.32%) 4915 (11.68%)
Arthralgiaa 2101 (8.92%) 3525 (8.38%)
Pain in extremityb 2058 (8.74%) 3959 (9.41%)
Back paina 473 (2.01%) 809 (1.92%)
Nervous system disorders
Headachea 5699 (24.19%) 10131 (24.07%)
Dizziness 2200 (9.34%) 3720 (8.84%)
Paraesthesia 875 (3.71%) 1500 (3.56%)
Syncope 540 (2.29%) 710 (1.69%)
Hypoaesthesia 531 (2.25%) 999 (2.37%)
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoead 1406 (5.97%) 2057 (4.89%)
Coughd 676 (2.87%) 1146 (2.72%)
Oropharyngeal pain 551 (2.34%) 948 (2.25%)
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritusa 813 (3.45%) 1447 (3.44%)
Rasha 784 (3.33%) 1404 (3.34%)
Erythemaa 642 (2.73%) 1044 (2.48%)
Hyperhidrosis 529 (2.25%) 900 (2.14%)
Total number of events 52814 93104
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081211
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 32Table6.Events Reported in ≥2% *Cases 
01 February 2021 Through 
28 February 2021Cumulatively Through 28 
February 2021
MedDRA SOC
    MedDRA PTAEs (AERP%)
N = 23558AEs (AERP%)
N = 42086
a.Listed or consistent with listed AEs in current RSI;
b.Added to the CDS after the data -lock point of this SMSR, on 02 March 2021;
c.Listed per case processing conventions; fordiscussion of relevant cases of Drug ineffective/COVID -19
see Table 11, Lack of Efficacy subsection;
d.Consistent with anaphylactic reactions listed in the current RSI ;
* Reporting proportion (% of total cases) in the current reporting period.
Most of the frequently  reported events are listed or consistent with listed event s as per the 
current RSI. Of note, the frequentl y reported events Dizziness ,Paraes thesia , Syncope and 
Tach ycardia , not listed as per the current RSIs, aresignals addressed during the reporting 
period (see Section 9.2).
During the reporting interval, t he distribution of the AEs reported in more than 2% of the 
cases by gender is presented in Figure 5. The observed imbalance in the female gender 
distribution reflect sthe imbalance in the gender distribution of the cases received in the 
reporting period.
The distribution of the AEs reported in more than 2% of the cases by age group and by SOC 
is showe d in Figure 6and Figure 7. The largest number of events is reported overall in the 
31-50 years age group. 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081212
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 33Figure5.Events Reported in ≥2%Cases in the Interval Period by Gender
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081213
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 34Figure6.PTReported in ≥2% in the Interval Period - by SOCand Age Group
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081214
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 35
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081215
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 36
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081216
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 37
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081217
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 38
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081218
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 39
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081219
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 40
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081220
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 41Figure7.Events Reported in ≥2% in the Interval Period by Age Group within 
Gender
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081221
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 42As per EMA PRAC assessment report (Product No. EMEA/H/C/005735/MEA/002 .1) 
received on the second SMSR , the MAH was requested to discuss the findings regarding side 
effects (particularly fever and muscle ache) reported more frequent and severe:
a.following the 1st dose;
b.following the 2nd dose;
in vaccinees that previously had a (PCR confirmed) COVID- 19 infection, including any 
implications for the product information.
MAH Response
The available data on subjects in the Phase 2/3 portion of Study  C4591001 with evidence of 
prior infection with SARS- CoV -2 as determined by NAAT or N -binding assay  (at Visit 1) 
suggest no clinically  meaningful difference with regard to clinical profile of the reported 
events . Out of a total safety  population of approximately  44,000 subjects of both arms at the 
time of the anal yses (14 November 2020), 545 BNT162b2 -vaccinated subjects and 580 
placebo recipients, were identified as baseline SARS -CoV -2 positive at Visit 1 and had 
safet y data available for anal ysis. 
Overall, there w ere no meaningful differences in the incidences or severity  of reactogenicit y, 
or incidences of AEs or SAEs between the baseline positive and negative subject groups. For 
any systemic reactions across all the measured reactions and doses, in the same 
react ogenicity  baseline SARS -CoV -2 status subsets, 70.1% compared to 77.7% reported at 
least 1 sy stemic event in those positive or negative at baseline, respectively . 
In participants positive at baseline for SARS -CoV -2, the reactogenicit y reported at the first
dose was generall y higher than after the second dose. Fever was reported in 12.3% and 7.5% 
after Dose 1 and Dose 2, respectively, and muscle pain was reported 29.9% and 27.8% after 
Dose 1 and Dose 2, respectively . Overall, the rate of reactogenicit y for e ach event measured 
was comparable to the rates for those negative at baseline for SARS -CoV -2. For example, 
muscle pain after any dose in baseline SARS -CoV -2 positive participants was 39.6% 
compared to 38.2 % in individuals negative for SARS -CoV -2 at baseli ne, while fever after 
any dose in baseline SARS -CoV -2 positive participants was 16.9% as compared to 14.1% in 
baseline negative participants. Hence, for s ystemic events the rate of reactogenicity  was 
higher after Dose 1 than Dose 2, but the overall rate wa s similar to the reactogenicit y rates 
observed in participants negative for SARS -CoV -2.
With regard to the AE profile, among the safety  data of ~38,000 participants33with AEs 
collected from Dose 1 to 1 month after Dose 2 and for which a median of 2 months of 
follow -up after Dose 2 was conducted , the frequency  of AEs were 22.0% and 27.1% in those 
who were positive (n=545 BNT162b2, n=580 placebo) and negative (n=17,841 BNT162b2, 
n=17,808 placebo) at baseline, respectively . Of the AEs reported, 16.5% and 21.0% were 
related AEs in those positive and negative at baseline, respectively . Most of these events 
                                                
33Population that met the requirement for the US EUA.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081222
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 43were local and s ystemic reactogenicity . SAEs were reported in 4 participants (0.7%) in the 
BNT162b2 recipients positive a t baseline compared to 97 participants (0.5%) in participants 
negative at baseline. 
The safet y profile (ie, reactogenicity and AEs) did not show a clinically meaningful 
difference on the basis of baseline SARS- CoV -2 status and did not suggest any  clinical
concern about BNT162b2 vaccination in individuals previously  exposed to SARS -CoV -2. As 
demonstrated b y the data included in the MAA, overall Dose 2 had a higher frequency  of 
systemic reactogenicity  across all participants. Based on this analy sis, the MAH did not 
recommend an update to the EU SmPC.
9.SIGNAL AND RISK EVAL UATION
9.1.Literature Review
Please refer to Appendix 6 for a summary  description of the interval literature review that is 
performed for the purpose of signal detection . There were no literature articles identify ing 
new safety  topics that would represent signals for BNT162b2 during the reporting interval.
9.2. Overview of Signals During the Reporting Interval
Signals addressed during the reporting interval are presented below in Table 7.
Table 7.Overview of Signals
Signal Status Category
Vom iting Closed Identified Risk (Not Important)
Diarrh oea Closed Identified Risk (Not Important)
Eye pain/Eye swelling Closed No Risk
Delayed Syncope Closed NoRisk
Hearing Loss and Tinnitus Closed No Risk
Immune thrombocytopenia Closed No Risk
Dizziness Ongoing Under evaluation
Facial paralysis Ongoing Under evaluation
Paraesthesia Ongoing Under evaluation
Herpes Zoster Ongoing Under evaluation
Tachycardia Ongoing Under evaluation
Vaccine stress -related responses Ongoing Under evaluation
Appendix 3 provides a summary of the safet ytopics and signals addressed during the 
reporting interval and Appendix 3.1 an evaluation of these safet y topics and signals . 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081223
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 44As per EMA PRAC assessment report (Product No. EMEA/H/C/005735/MEA/002 .1) 
received on the second SMSR, the following cumulative overviews wereperformed for:
Safety  evaluation of Immune thrombocy topenia (Appendix 3.2);
Safety  evaluation of Hearing loss and Tinnitus ( Appendix 3.3 );
Safety  evaluation of Insomnia with discussion on duration ( Appendix 3.4);
Safety  evaluation of Dizziness ( Appendix 3.5);
Safety  evaluation of Guillain -Barré s yndrome (Appendix 3. 6).
9.3.Summary of Safety Concerns
Table 8 summari sesthe comprehensive list of important risks and missing information 
reflected in risk management and pharmacovigilance plans globall yfor BNT162b2 at the 
beginning of the reporting pe riod. The pharmacovigilance and risk management activities 
implemented for the safety  concerns by  Pfizer on behalf of BioNTech are global.
Table 8.Safety Concerns
Important Identified Risk Anaphylaxisa
Important Potential Risk Vaccine- Associated Enhanced Disease (VAED), Including 
Vaccine -Associated Enhanced Respiratory Dise ase (VAERD)a
Missing Information Use in Pregnancy and While Breast Feedinga
Use in Immunocompromised Patientsb
Use in Frail Patients With Co-M orbidities (e.g. COPD, Diabetes, 
Chronic Neurological Disease, Cardiovascular disorders)b
Use in Patient s With Autoimmune or Inflammatory Disordersb
Interaction With Other Vaccinesb
Long -Term Safety D atab
Use in Paediatric Individuals <16 Years of Agec
Vaccine Effectivenessc
a.As per both the EU RMP Version 1.0, dated 21 December 2020 and the US PVP Version 0. 3, dated 20
January 2021;
b.As per the EU RMP Version 1.0, dated 21 December 2020 ;
c.As per the US PVP Version 0. 3, dated 20 January 2021 .
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081224
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2)  Reporting Period  
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3  01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021  
 
CONFIDENTIAL  
Page 45 
 9.4. Summary of  Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs)  
Please refer to Appendix 5 for the list of the company’s AESIs for BNT162b2 . Please refer to 
Appendix 5 .1 for the observed versus expected analysis for AESIs.34,35 
The company’s AESI list takes into consideration the lists of AESIs from the following 
expert groups and regulatory authorities: Brighton Collaboration (SPEAC), ACCESS 
protocol, US CDC (preliminary list of AESI for VAERS surveillance), MHRA (unpublished 
guideline).  
The AESI term s are incorporated into a TME list and include events of interest due to their 
association with severe COVID -19 and events  of interest for vaccines in general.  
The AESI list includes MedDRA  PTs, HLTs , HLGTs or MedDRA  SMQs  and can be 
changed as appropriate based on  the evolving safety profile of the vaccine.  
9.5. Evaluation of Safety Concerns  
Evaluation of new information collected  from post -marketing data sources7 for BNT162b2 
during the interval reporting period for important identified  and important potential risks , 
AESIs , special situations and missing information is provided below in Section 9.5.1 , 
Section  9.5.2 , Section 9.5.3  and Section 9.5.4 . 
9.5.1.  Evaluation of  Important Identified and Important Potential Risks  
Table 9 below  presents the e valuation of new information received during the interval 
reporting period from post -marketing  data sources7  for the important identified and 
important potentia l risks of BNT162b2 . 
Table 9. Risks Evaluation  for BNT162b2  
Safety  Risk  Post-Marketing Case s Evaluationa 
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558 ) 
Important Identified Risk 
Anaphylaxise 
 
Search criteria: Anaphylactic 
reaction SMQ (Narrow and Broad, 
with the algorithm applied), 
selecting relevant cases according 
to BC criteria  
 Number of cases from the Anaphylactic  reaction SMQ ( Narrow and 
Broad) search strategy, applying the MedDRA algorithm based on all 
terms in the SMQ: 115636 (4.9% compared to 3.4% of the total PM 
dataset of the previous SMSR), of which 907 were medically 
confirmed and 249 were non -medically con firmed;  
• Number of events: 2868;  
 
34 It shou ld be noted that for the O/E analyses, the numbers of doses of vaccine administrated had been 
estimated based on publicly available data from health authorities in various regions.  
35 As per EMA PRAC assessment report (Product No. EMEA/H/C/005735/MEA/002.1)  sSpecific O/E 
analysis for arrythmias, deafness, hypertension, tinnitus, sudden hearing loss  were also included in 
Appendix  5.1.  
36 One additional case was made invalid after the DLP  due to lack of minimum valid criteria to process the 
case.  
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081225
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 46Table 9.Risks Evaluation for BNT162b2
SafetyRisk Post-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Country of incidence ( 2%): UK (257), Mexico (138), US (135), 
Italy (105), Germany (103), France (51), Spain (49), Greece (35),  
Sweden (28), Austria and Portugal (25 each); 
Subject s’ gender: female (976), male (150) and unknown (30);
Subject s’ age (n = 1100): ranged from 4 years (2 subject s) to 100 
years (mean = 48.1 years, median = 46 years);
Most frequently reported individual PTs (≥2%): Dyspnoea (365), 
Anaphylactic reaction (360), Rash (189), Pruritus (172), 
Erythema ( 145), Cough (126), Respiratory distress (124), 
Urticaria (100), Hypotension (78), Sw ollen tongue (74), Sw elling 
face (72), Anaphylactic shock (71), Lip sw elling (69), Chest 
discomfort (66), Oedema (64), Flushing (56), Throat tightness 
(49), Pharyngeal swel ling (48), Circulatory collapse (45), 
Swelling (40), Angioedema and Wheezing (38 each) and 
Bronchospasm (35) , Blood pressure decreased (28), Type I 
hypersensitivity (27), Tongue oedema (25) and Face oedema (24 );
Relevant event seriousness: serious (2203), non-serious (665);
Relevant event outcome:dfatal (46), resolved/resolving (1741), 
resolved with sequelae (30), not resolved (203), unknown (857).
Cases (1156) w ere individually reviewed and assessed according to 
Brighton Collaboration (BC) case definition and level of diagnostic 
certainty as show n in theTable below .
Brighton Collaboration Level Number of cases
BC 1 212
BC 2 225
BC 3 7
BC 4 296
BC 5 416
Total 1156
Level 1 indicates a case with the highest level of diagnostic certainty 
of anaphylaxis, whereas the diagnostic certainty is low est for Level 3. 
Level 4 is defined as “reported event of anaphylaxis, with insufficient 
evidence to meet the case definition” and Level 5 as not a case of 
anaphylaxis.
BC Level 1 and 2 cases:
Number of cases : 437 (1467 events of interest)
Medical history (n=239): the most frequently ( ≥2%) reported medical 
conditions included Hypersensitivity (51), Asthma (46), Food allergy 
(44), Drug hypersensitivity (40) , Hypertension (22) , Anaphylactic 
reaction (17), Seasonal allergy (16), Allergy to animal and C OVID -19 
(10 each) and Urticaria (9 ). 
Number of vaccine doses administered at the time of the event onset: 
1 dose in 248 cases, 2 doses in 51 cases and number of doses w as not 
specified in 138 cases.
Relevant PTs (2%): Dyspnoea (215), Rash (130), Erythema (103), 
Pruritus (102), Anaphylactic reaction (87), Respiratory distress (78), 
Urticaria (68), Cough (56), Hypotension (52), Sw elling face (43), 
Swollen tongue (40), Throat tightness (33), Oedema (32), Pharyngeal 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081226
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 47Table 9.Risks Evaluation for BNT162b2
SafetyRisk Post-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
swelling (31), Lip swelling (30), Wheezing (29), Angioedema and 
Bronchospasm (27 each), Chest discomfort (24), Blood pressure 
decreased (20), Sw elling (18), Anaphylactic shock (17), Flushing and  
Tongue oedema (15 each), Laryngeal oedema (14) , Face oedema (13), 
Mouth swe lling and Stridor (11 each), Rash pruritic (10), Sensation of 
foreign body and Type I hypersensitivity (9 each ).
Relevant event outcome: fatal (6), resolved/resolving (874), resolved 
with sequelae (9), not resolved (84), unknown (497).
Fatal cases: 2
1.Coun try: US; 
Subject ’s gender and age: female subject aged 58 years;
Medical history: hypersensitivity to penicillin, hypertension, 
obesity, sleep apnoea syndrome and type 2 diabetes mellitus;
Vaccine dose: 1
Lot Number: EL9263
Event onset date: Day 0; ( 1 hou r after receiving the vaccine);
PTs: Acute pulmonary oedema, Anaphylactic reaction, Vomiting, 
Dyspnoea, Flushing and Illness . Acute pulmonary oedema and 
Anaphylactic reaction are reported with fatal outcome.
Treatments: diphenhydramine hydrochloride, epine phrine, oxygen 
and cardiopulmonary resuscitation was performed.
Autopsy :not performed.
2.Country: Belgium
Subject ’s age and gender: female subject aged 69 years;
Medical history: Appendicitis, Cholecystectomy, Dementia with 
Lewy bodies; Urinary incontinence, Urinary tract infection and 
Vertigo positional
Concomitant medications: enoxaparin, donepezil, 
benserazide/levodopa, melatonin, ascorbic acid/ ferrous 
sulfate,estriol and pantoprazole/sesquihydrate
Vaccine dose: 1
Lot number: EM0477
Event ons et date: Day 0 (1 hour after receiving the vaccine);
PTs: Dyspnoea, Hypotension, Malaise, Anaphylactic reaction, 
COVID -19 pneumonia, Acute respiratory failure and Cardio -
respiratory arrest. All events reported a fatal outcome.
Treatments: adrenaline
Autopsy: not specified if it was performed.
Discussion 
Anaphylaxis is anadverse reaction in Section 4.8 of the EU SmPC , in 
the CDS and local labels/fact sheets . It is also included as an Important 
identified risk in the EU RMP and inthe US PVP.eBased upon review 
ofthe available information, no additional change to the RSI is 
warranted at this time. 
On 08 February 2021, a cumulative revie w of all cases reporting 
serious hypersensitivity  reactions suggestive of anaphylaxis using the 
Brighton Collaboration criteria and inclusive of Observed versus 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081227
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 48Table 9.Risks Evaluation for BNT162b2
SafetyRisk Post-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Expected analysis was submitted to EMA in a LEG procedu re as per 
EMA PRAC assessment report (Product No. 
EMEA/H/C/005735/MEA/002) received on the first SMSR. Follow ing 
EMA feedback, the response to the Post -Authori sation Measure LEG -
022 Assessment will be submitted in conjunction with the current 
SMSR.
Conclusion: Evaluation of BC cases Level 1 and 2 as well as 3 and 4 
did not reveal any significant new safety information. Anaphylaxis is 
appropriately described in the product labeling as are non -
anaphylactic hypersensitivity events . Surveillance will con tinue.
Important Potential R isk
Vaccine- Associated Enhanced 
Disease (VAED) Including 
Vaccine- Associated Enhanced 
Respiratory Disease (VAERD)b,cVAED is a m odified and/or severe presentation of an infectious 
disease affecting individuals exposed to the wild -type pathogen after 
having received vaccine designed to prevent infection.37
As noted by the Brighton Collaboration, there is currently no 
uniform ly accepted definition of VAED (or VAERD) and the BC 
working group considers that a definitive case of VAED (Level 1 
diagnostic certainty) cannot be ascertained with current knowledge of 
the mechanisms of pathogenesis of the condition ; they have provided 
guidance onlevels of diagnostic certainty of VAED cases based on 
various laboratory and clinical findings .
No post -authorized AE reports have been identified as cases of 
VAED/VAERD, therefore, there is no observed d ataat this time.  An 
expected rate of VAED is difficult to establish so a meaningful 
observed/expected analysis cannot be conducted at this point based on 
available data. The feasibility of conducting such an analysis w ill be 
re-evaluated on an ongoing basis as data on the virus grows and the 
vaccine safety data continues to accrue. 
The search criteria utilised to identify potential cases of VAED for this 
SMSR include sPTs indicating a lack of effect of the vaccine and 
medical disorders chosen because they are PTs potentially indicative 
of severe or atypical COVID- 19.
Overview
Number of cases based on search strategy: 73(0.3% of the total 
PM dataset , compared to 0.4% ofthe previous reporting period ), 
all serious (of which 44are medically confirmed )h;
Country of incidence: UK(38), US ( 8), Germany ( 7), France, 
Spain ( 4 each ), Italy (3 ), Denmark (2);the remaining 7cases 
originated from 7different countries.
Gender: female ( 40), males ( 26),unknown ( 7).
                                                
37Flor M Munoz, et al. Vaccine -associated Enhanced Disease: Case Definition and Guidelines for Data 
Collection, Analysis, and Presentation of Immunization Safety Data. Brighton Collaboration. September 2020, 
Vaccine Journal Draft Manuscript.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081228
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 49Table 9.Risks Evaluation for BNT162b2
SafetyRisk Post-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Age: 23to 100 years (n = 71), mean = 63.8, 
median = 68.0;
Respiratory system PTs: Dyspnoea ( 23), COVID -19 pneumonia 
(15), Respiratory failure (5), Hypoxia, Pulmonary embolism ,(3
each), Tachypnoea (1 ). 
Gastrointestinal system PTs:Diarrhoea ( 14), Vomiting ( 11), 
Abdominal pain ( 2);
Nervous system PTs :Seizure (6), Encephalopathy (1) ;
Other systems , relevant PTs :Arrhythmia , Cardiac failure, Acute 
kidney injury, Renal failure, Thrombocytopenia, Shock (1 each) .
Case outcome: fatal ( 20), not resolved ( 34), resolved/resolving 
(14), unknown at the time of the reporting ( 4), resolved w ith 
sequelae (1 ). 
COVID-19 positivity and severity of events
Suspected COVID -19 infection (test not performed or negative or 
inconclusive) : 21.
Confirmed COVID -19 infection : 52(test positive).
Seriousness criteria for the total 73cases :
oMedically significant: 34(of which 5serious also for 
disability);
oHospitalization required (non-fatal/non -life threatening) : 
11;
oLife threatening: 8 ;
oDeath: 20 (All subject s had COVID- 19 test positive) .
Seriousness criteria: m edically significant (34)
In 15,out of 3 4cases where the seriousness criteria was
“medically significant”, it was reported that the subject s had a 
COVID-19 positive test after vaccination , while 19subject shad 
unconfirmed suspected COVID -19.  These 34subject s didnot 
require hospitalization .
Age: 25 to 96 ( n=15), Mean=56 .3, Median=51.
Among the 15COVID -19 positive subject s:
3received the 1stvaccine dose. Latency to COVID -19was
15, 16 and 50days respectively .
o5 received the 1stand the 2ndvaccine doses . Latency to 
COVID -19 ranged from 1 to 15 days; in 1 case the 
subject tested positive for COVID -19 on the same day of 
the 2nddose administration and 19 days after the 1stdose
o7 case s did not indicate the number of doses the subject
had received . Latency to COVID 19 w as reported for 6
subject sand ranged from 5to 17days post-vaccination.
The PTs reported more than twice in these 15 cases were: Drug 
ineffective (15), COVID -19 (13), Cough (7), Dyspnea, Pyrexia (6 
each), Diarrhoea (5), Chest pain, Vomiting (4 each) , Dizziness, 
Myalgia, SAR -CoV- 2 test positive, and Tachy cardia (2 each).
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081229
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 50Table 9.Risks Evaluation for BNT162b2
SafetyRisk Post-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
COVID -19 infection outcome :resolved/resolving (7), not resolved (4), 
unknown (4).
Seriousness criteria: hospitalization (non-fatal, non -life 
threatening) (11)
Hospitalization occurred in 10subject s, for 1 of them COVID- 19 
was not confirmed (inconclusive test).
Age: 30 to 100 ( n=9), Mean=63 .9, Median=67: 
Among the 10 COVID- 19 positive subject s
o3 received the 1stvaccine dose. Latency to COVID -19 
was reported for 1 subject (17 days).
o2 received the 1stand the 2ndvaccine doses . Latency to 
COVID -19 w as reported for 1 subject (10 days).
o5 cases did not indicate the number of doses thesubject s
had received . Latency to COVID -19 w as reported in all 
cases and ranged from 2 to 14 days post -vaccination.
The PTs reported more than twi ce in these 10 cases were: Drug 
ineffective (10), COVID -19 (8), Dyspnoea (4), Cough, COVID -19 
pneumonia, Diarrhoea, Oxygen saturation decreased, Pneumonia (2 
each). 
Covid -19 infection’s outcome: resolved/resolving (3), not resolved (3), 
unknown (4).
Seriousness criteria: life threatening (8)
Hospitalization occurred in 3 of the 8 cases characterized as 
life-threatening ;COVID -19 was suspected for 1 of the 8 subject s. 
Age: 52 to 88 ( n=7), Mean=74 .9, Median=81
Among the 7 positive COVID -19 subject s: 
o2 received the 1stvaccine dose. Latency to COVID -19 
was reported for 1 subject (18 days).
o1 received the 1stand the 2ndvaccine doses . Latency to 
COVID -19 unknown.
o4 cases did not indicate the number of doses the subject s 
hadreceived. Latency to COVID -19 was reported in 3 
cases and ranged from 5 to 17 days post -vaccination.
The PTs reported more than twice in these 8 cases were : Drug 
ineffective (8), COVID -19 (5), COVID- 19 pneumonia (4), Dyspnoea 
(2); Suspected COVID -19 (1) was the other term associated t o the 
LOE PT.
COVID -19 infection outcome: not resolved (6), resolved w ith sequelae 
(1), and unknown (Suspected COVID -19).
Seriousness criteria: death(20)
Twenty (20) subject sdied, all had a COVID -19 positive test after 
vaccination :
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081230
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 51Table 9.Risks Evaluation for BNT162b2
SafetyRisk Post-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
oAge: 63to 92years (n = 20), mean = 8 4.2, 
median = 85.
oCountries of incidence : UK ( 5), Germany ( 4), Denmark , 
France, Spain, andUS (2 each) , Belgium, Czech 
Republic, and Italy ( 1 each). 
oGender : female ( 9), male (1 1).
oMedical history (n=16)of clinical significance included 
PTs in the following SOCs :
Nervous system disorders: 11 ( 55.0%) [Cerebral 
infarction, Cerebrovascular accident, Cognitive 
disorder, Dementia, Dementia Alzheimer’s type (2 
each), Cerebral thrombosis, Facial paralysis, 
Ischaemic stroke, Parkinson's disease, Vascular 
dementia (1 each)];
Cardiac disorders : 9 (45.0%) [Atrial fibrillation ( 5), 
Cardiac failure ( 2)Acute myocardial infarction, 
Angina pectoris, Bundle branch block left, 
Cardiomyopathy, Cardiovascular disorder, Coronary 
artery disease, Myocardial infarction (1 each) ]; 
Metabolism and nutrition disorders: 9 (45.0%) [Type 
2 diabetes mellitus (5), Diabetes mellitus (3), 
Dyslipidemia (2), Hypercalcemia, Insulin -requiring 
type 2 diabetes mellitus , Vitamin B12 deficiency (1 
each)] ;
Renal and urinary disorders: 7 (35.0%) [Chronic 
kidney disease (5), Renal impairment (2 each), Renal 
cyst (1);
Vascular disorders: 7 (35%) [Hypertension ( 7), Deep 
vein thrombosis (1);
Latency of COVID -19 occurrence was reported for allcases and 
ranged from 2 to 41 days after vaccination:
o14to 25 days after dose 1 (12);
o8 to 14 days after dose 2 (2);
o10 days after dose 2 ( 1);
o2 to 41 days after vaccination (dose number not reported )
(6).
Cause of death (n=20)reported more than once were: Drug 
ineffective (9), COVID -19 , COVID- 19 pneumonia (8 each), 
Respiratory failure (4), Acute respiratory failure, Confusional 
state, Dyspnoea, Oxygen saturation decreased, Pulmonary 
embolism (2 each). 
In 2 fatal cases, vaccination failure was reported (cross ref. with 
Section 9.5.3 –Lack of efficacy ):
A63-year-old female subject , with type 2 diabetes, arterial 
hypertension, chronic renal failure a ndrecent closed fracture 
of multiple cervical vertebrae, was admitted to intensive care 
unit for acute respiratory failure (onset of symptoms 5 days 
before) caused by untyped bacterial pneumonia; on the same 
day, 14 days after the 2ndvaccine dose, she had a positive 
SAR -CoV -2 PCR rapid test ; how ever, chest X -Ray was not 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081231
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 52Table 9.Risks Evaluation for BNT162b2
SafetyRisk Post-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
suggestive of COVID -19 pneumonia; she died within 24 
hours due to septic shock and multi -organ failure.
Vaccination failure was coded in this case due to coding 
convention criteria.
An 85 -year-old female subject , with unspecified thyroid 
disorder andon psychotropic drugs for unspecified diagnosis 
and food supplements, developed vomiting and “aggravated 
food intake”, 7 day s after the 2nddose. S he w as transferred to 
the hospital, where she was diagnosed with massive 
pulmonary embolism with saturation 50%; the day after, she 
had a positive PCR COVID -19 test and she died on the same 
day. Pulmonary embolism in this COVID -19 positive subject
may be due to COVID -19 or to an unspecified or unknown 
underlying medical condition. 
VAED may present as severe o r unusual clinical manifestations of 
COVID -19. Overall, there were 52 subject s with test -confirmed 
COVID -19 following one or both doses of the vaccine. 33 of the 52 
cases were severe, resulting in hospitalization or death.  None of the 52 
cases could be definitively considered as having VAED/VAERD .
Conclusion: In this review of subject s with COVID -19 following 
vaccination, based on the current evidence, VAED/VAERD remains a
theoretical risk for the vaccine Surveillance will continue.
a.Please note that this corresponds to evidence from post -EUA /conditional marketing authori sation 
approval data sources;
b.As per both the EU RMP Version 1.0, dated 21 December 2020 and the US PVP, Version 0. 3, dated 20 
January 2021 ;
c.Search criteria: Standard Decreased Therapeutic Response Search AND PTs Dyspnoea; Tachypnoea; 
Hypoxia; COVID 19pneumonia; Respiratory Failure; Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome; 
Cardiac Failure; Cardiogenic shock; Acute myocardial infarction; Arrhythmia; Myocarditis; Vomiting; 
Diarrhoea; Abdominal pain; Jaundice; Acute hepatic failure; Deep vein throm bosis; Pulmonary embolism; 
Peripheral Ischaemia; Vasculitis; Shock; Acute kidney injury; Renal failure; Altered state of consciousness; 
Seizure; Encephalopathy; Meningitis; Cerebrovascular accident; Thrombocytopenia; 
Disseminated intrav ascular coagulation; Chillblains; Erythema multiforme; Multiple organ 
dysfunction syndrome; Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children ;
d.Multiple episodes of the same PT event were repo rted w ith a different clinical outcome within some 
cases hence the sum of the events outcome exceeds the total number of PT events.
e.As per the EU RMP Version 1.0, dated 21 December 2020 ; the US PVP w as updated during the 
reporting period w ith the finalization of the US PVP, Version 0.3, dated 20 January 2021, to include 
Anaphylaxis as an Important identified risk.
f.Subject s with age ranged between 18 and 64 years;
g.Subject s with age equal to or above 65 years.
h.Note that 24 additional cases, retrieved w ith this search strategy, have been excluded from the discussion 
because, upon revie w, they cannot be considered true lack of efficacy cases: 23 cases, where the PT Drug 
ineffective was coded, reported that the subject s deve loped SARS -CoV- 2 infection during the early days 
from the first dose (days 1 –13); the vaccine has not had sufficient time to stimulate the immune system and, 
consequently, the development of a vaccine preventable disease during this time is not considere d a potential 
lack of effect of the vaccine; in 1 case the PT Drug ineffective has been removed after DLP because the 
subject experienced COVID -19 like symptoms but the COVID -19 test (PCR) w as negative.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081232
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 539.5.2.Evaluation of AESIs
Table 10 below presents the evaluation of new information received during the interval 
reporting period from post -marketing data sources7with regard to the AESIs forBNT162b2 .
Where applicable, o bserved versus expected anal ysis is provided in Appendix 5.1.
Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Anaphylactic Reactions
Search criteria: Anaphylactic 
reaction SMQ (Narrow and 
Broad, with the algorithm 
applied),selecting relevant cases 
according to BC criteriaPlease refer to the Risk ‘Anaphylaxis ’ inTable 9.
Cardiovascular AESIs
Search criteria: PTs Acute 
myocardial infarction;
Arrhythmia; Cardiac failure;
Cardiac failure acute;
Cardiogenic shock; Coronary 
artery disease; Myocardial 
infarction; Postural orthostatic 
tachycardia syndrome; Stress 
cardiomyopathy; TachycardiaNumber of cases: 924 (3.9% of the total PM dataset, compared to 
2.4% in the previous reporting period), of w hich 768 are medically 
confirmed and 156 are non -medically confirmed;
Country of incidence: Mexico (185), UK (128), France (121), Italy 
(109), Germany (65), US (56), Spain (43), Greece (33), Portugal 
(32), Ireland (17), Sw eden (15), Poland (13), Netherlands (11), 
Austria and Finland (10 each), Belgium (9), Czech Republic, 
Hungary and Norw ay (8 each), Croatia and Romania (7 each), 
Latvia (4), Canada, Denmark and Israel (3 each); the remaining 16 
cases were distributed among 12 other countries;
Subject s’ gender: female (717), male (193) and unknown (14);
Subject s’ age (n = 88 6): ranged from 17to 102 years (mean = 50. 4
years, median = 47 years);
Subject s’ age group (n = 89 4): Adultc(703), Elderlyd(190) and
Adolescente  (1);
Number of relevant events: 956, of which 677 serious, 279 
non-serious; in the cases reporting relevant serious events, 
subject ’s age ranges from 17to 102 years (mean = 54. 5years, 
median = 49 .5years);
Reported relevant PTs: Tachycardia (713), Arrhythmia *(83), 
Cardiac failure *(61), Myocardial infarction* (55), Acute 
myocardial infarction* (19), Cardiac failure acute *(10), 
Cardiogenic shock *and Postural orthostatic tachycardia 
syndrome *(6 each) and Coronary artery disease *(3);
Relevant event onset latency (n = 826): Range from 24 hours to 
21 days, median <24 hours;
Relevant event outcome:ffatal ( 83), resolved/resolving ( 515), 
resolved with sequelae ( 11), not resolved ( 89)andunknown ( 260);
In 73 cases out of 924 cases (involving 41 female and 32 male 
subject s with ages ranged from 35 to 97 years, mean 76.8 years, 
median 81 years), 34 of which had fatal outcome, the subject ’s 
medical history was significant for the specific events of Cardiac 
failure (34), Myocardial infarction (17), Coronary artery disease 
(11), Arrhythmia (9), Tachycardia (4), Acute myocardial infarction 
and Postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (3 each), 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081233
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 54Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Cardiogenic shock and Stress cardiomyopathy (1 each).  More 
than 1 relevant medical history event was reported in 9 cases;
Additionally, in 94 out of 924 cases, the subject ’s medical history 
was significant for other cardiac disorders, with the following 
conditions reported most frequently (>2 cases): Atrial fibrillation 
(40), Myocardial ischaemia (14), Cardiovascular disorder (6), 
Angina pectoris (5), Hypertensive heart disease (4), Cardiac 
disorder, Palpitations and Supraventricular tachycardia (3 each);
In 65 out of 924 cases, the subject s’ medical history was 
significa nt for COVID -19 or suspected COVID -19.
* Observed/Expected analysis was performed for Acute myocardial 
infarction /Myocardial infarction , Arrhythmia, Cardiac failure/Cardiac
failure acute, Cardiogenic shock, Coronary Artery disease and Postural 
orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (see Appendix 5.1 ). 
Conclusion: Tachy cardia is an ongoing signal (see Appendix 3 and 
Appendix 3.1 ). No other cardiovascular signals have emerged from the 
review of post -authori sation data . The review  of cases and O/E 
analysis do not raise new concerns. Surveillance will continue .
COVID-19 AESIs
Search criteria: Covid -19 SMQ 
(Narrow and Broad) OR PTs 
Ageusia; AnosmiaiNumber of cases: 1630 (6.9% of the total PM dataset, compared to 
7.6% in the previous reporting period), of w hich 1067 are 
medically confirmed and 563 are non -medically confirmed;
Country of incidence: US (412), UK (323), Germany (233), France 
(153), Italy (76), Spain (62), Romania (41), Belgium (37), Poland 
(35), Mexico and Portugal (32 each), Sw eden (29), Austria (25), 
Greece (23), Israel (22), Denmark (17), Czech Republic (14), 
Hungary (13), Ireland (11), Canada (5), Netherlands, Switzerland 
and United Arab Emirates (4 each), Costa Rica, Slovakia and 
Slovenia (3 each); the remaining 14 cases were distributed among 
10 other different countries;
Subject s’ gender: female (874), male (468) and unknown (288);
Subject s’ age group (n= 1039 ): Adultc(645), Elderlyd(390), 
Infantg(2), Adolescenteand Childh(1 each);
Number of relevant events: 1760, of which 1325 serious, 435 
non-serious;
Most frequently reported relevant PTs ( 1 occurrence): COVID- 19 
(1092), Suspected COVID -19 (142), Ageusia *and SARS -CoV -2 
test positive (114 each), Anosmia *(91), SARS -CoV- 2 antibody 
test negative (67), COVID -19 pneumonia and SARS -CoV -2 
antibody test positive (38 each), Asymptomatic COVID -19 (22), 
Exposure to SARS -CoV -2 (18), Coronavirus infection (10 ), 
Coronavirus test positive (4), Occupational exposure to SARS -
CoV- 2 (3), SARS -CoV -2 antibody test and SARS -CoV -2 test 
negative (2 each);
Relevant event onset latency (n = 1115): Range from <24 hours to 
50 days, median 6 days;
Relevant event outcome: fatal (98), not resolved ( 312), 
resolved/resolving ( 333), resolved with sequ elae (4)and unknown 
(1014 ).
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081234
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 55Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
* Observed/Expected analysis was performed for Ageusia and 
Anosmia (see Appendix 5.1 ). 
Conclusion: No safety signals have emerged based on a review  of these 
cases ,however the lower level of the confidence interval exceeds 1 for 
the cumulative and interval risk periods in the Observed versus 
Expected analysis. Anosmia and ageusia will be reviewed and 
discussed in the next SMSR .
Dermatological AESIs
Search criteria: PT Chillblains ; 
Erythema multiformejNumber of cases: 15 cases (0.06% of the total PM dataset, 
compared to 0.01% in the previous reporting period), of w hich 12 
are medically confirmed and 3 are non -medically confirmed ;
Country of incidence: UK (5), France and Poland (2 each), and the 
remaining 6 cases were distributed among 6 other different 
countries;
Subject s’ gender: female (14) and unknown (1);
Subject s’ age group (n= 15): Adultc(14), Elderlyd(1);
Number of relevant events: 15 events, 13 serious, 2 non -serious 
Reported relevant PTs: Erythema multiforme *(11) and 
Chillblains *(4)
Relevant event onset latency (n = 14): Range from  24 hours to 17 
days, median 4 days;
Relevant event outcome: resolved/r esolving (6), not resolved and 
unknown (5 each).
* Observed/Expected analysis wasperformed for Chillblains and 
Erythema multiforme (see Appendix 5.1 ). 
Conclusion: No safety signals have emerged based on a review  of these 
cases ,or of the Observed versus Expected analysis. Surveillance will 
continue
Haematological AESIs
Search criteria: Leukopenias NEC 
(HLT) (Primary Path) OR 
Neutropenias (HLT) (Primary 
Path) OR PTs Immune 
thrombocytopenia ,j
Thrombocytopenia OR SMQ 
Haemorrhage terms (excl 
laboratory termskNumber of cases: 612 (2.6% of the total PM dataset ),kof which 
330medically confirmed and 282non-medically confirmed;
Country of incidence: UK ( 229), US (149 ), France ( 45), Italy (35), 
Germ any (30), Spain (23), Mexico (12), Poland ( 9), Netherlands 
(8), Ireland, Portugal and Sweden (7 each), Denmark and Finland 
(6 each), Austria, Israel and Norw ay (5 each), Croatia (4), Greece 
(3), Belgium, Cyprus, Hungary and Latvia (2 each); the remaining 
9 cases originated from 9 different countries; 
Subject s’ gender (n=592): female (442)andmale (1 50);
Subject s’ age group (n= 555): Adultc(339), Elderlyd(216);
Number of relevant events: 721, of w hich 519serious, 202
non-serious;
Most frequently reported relevant PTs ( ≥15 occurrences) include : 
Epistaxis (75), Contusion (71), Vaccination site bruising (46), 
Haem orrhage * (34), Petechiae ( 33), Vaccination site haemorrhage 
(31), Haematochezia and Vaccination site haematoma (26 each), 
Conjunctival haemorrhage and Thrombocytopenia *(24 each), 
Haem atoma (20), Menorrhagia (19), Rectal haemorrhage (18), 
Immune thrombocytopenia *and Vaginal haemorrhage (17 each), 
Haem atemesis, Haemoptysis and Neutropenia (15 each); 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081235
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 56Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Relevant event onset latency (n = 534): Range from 24 hours to 
33days, m edian = 1 day;
Relevant event outcome:ffatal (16), resolved/resolving ( 268), 
resolved with sequelae (1 4), not resolved ( 174)and unknown 
(251).
As per EMA PRAC assessment report received on the second SMSR, a
cumulative overv iew of all cases reporting Immune
thrombocytopenia/T hrombocytopenia , using Search strategy of HLT 
Thrombocytopenias and SMQ Haematopoietic thrombocytopenia 
(narrow  and broad), w as conducted and included in Appendix 3. 2.
* Observed/Expected analysis w as performed for Haem orrhage, 
Immune thrombocytopenia and Thrombocytopenia (see Appendix 5.1 ). 
Conclusion: No other signals for the hematological AESIs have 
emerged based on a review of these cases , or of the Observed versus 
Expected analysis. Surveillance w ill continue.
Hepatic AESIs
Search criteria: Liver related 
investigations, signs and 
symptoms (SMQ) (Narrow and 
Broad) OR PT Liver injuryNumber of cases: 52 cases (0.2% of the total PM dataset , 
compared to 0. 1% of the previous reporting period), of w hich 38
medically confirmed and 14 non -medically confirmed ;
Country of incidence: UK ( 11), US ( 9), France (7), Italy (5), 
Germ any (4), Mexico and Spain (3 each), Austria, Belgium and 
Iceland (2 each) and Denmark, Greece, Ireland and Slovakia (1 
each);
Subject s’ gender: female ( 35), male (16)and unknown (1) ;
Subject s’ age group (n= 47): Adultc(28), Elderlyd(19);
Number of relevant events: 69, of which 36serious, 33
non-serious;
Reported relevant PTs: Alanine aminotransferase increased (11),
Transaminases increased (8), Hepatic pain (7), Liver function test 
increased (6), Aspartate aminotransferase increased, Gamma -
glutamyltransferase increased and Liver function test abnormal (5 
each), Hepatic enzyme increased (4), Blood alkaline phosphatase 
increased , Blood bilirubin increased andHypertransaminasaemia 
(3 each), Ascites and Liver injury *(2each) and Deficiency of bile 
secretion, Hepatic function abnormal, Hepatomegaly, 
Hyperbilirubinaemia and Liver tenderness (1 each); 
Relevant event onset latency (n = 46): Range from 24 hours to 20
days, median 3 days;
Relevant event outcome: fatal ( 2), resolved/resolving ( 15),
resolved with sequelae (1), not resolved ( 11) and unknown ( 40).
* Observed/Expected analysis w as performed for Liver injury (see 
Appendix 5.1 ). 
Conclusion: No safety signals have emerged based on a review  of th ese
cases , or of the Observed versus Expected analysis. Surveillance will 
continue .
Facial Paralysis As per EMA PRAC assessment report (Product No. 
EMEA/H/C/005735/MEA/002.1) received on the second SMSR, the 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081236
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 57Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Search criteria: PT sFacial 
paralysis, Facial paresisMAH was requested to thoroughly follow -up cases reporting facial 
paralysis including the outcome and if recovered the days till recovery 
to estimate the total durat ion of this ADR. Once a reliable estimate of 
duration is available from case reports, the MAH is requested to 
include information of duration of facial paralysis complaints in the 
product information. The MAH was also requested to indicate when the 
resultsof the assessments of the facial paralysis cases in the clinical 
study data will be available.
A cumulative case series evaluation of this topic , with cases assessed 
according to BC case definition and criteria, was included in the second 
SMSR (reporting period 01 -31 January 2021) and w ill be repeated as 
warranted. 
A review of the interval cases reported during the current reporting 
period follows.
Number of cases: 323l(1.4% of the total PM dataset , com pared to 
0.7% of previous reporting period ), 228medically confirmed and 
95 non- medically confirmed;
Country of incidence: UK (83 ), US (65), I taly(37), France ( 27), 
Spain (1 7), Germany (1 1), Sweden (1 0), Ireland (9), Israel (8), 
Austria (7), Finland (6), Cyprus , Hungary and Portugal (5 each ), 
Mexico (4), Canada andCroatia (3 each), Malta, Netherlands , 
Norw ay, Poland and Romania (2 each) ; the remaining 8cases 
originated from 8different countries;
Subject s’ gender: female ( 209), male ( 103), unknown ( 11);
Subject s’ age group (n= 304): Adultc(221), Elderlyd(82), Infant
(1);g,n
Number of relevant events:m323, of which 319serious, 4
non-serious ;
Reported relevant PTs: Facial paralysis (283), Facial paresis (40);
Relevant event onset latency (n = 286): Range from <24 hours to 
29days, median 2 days;
Relevant event outcome: resolved/resolving ( 138), resolved with 
sequelae ( 1), not resolved ( 129) and unknown ( 55);
Duration of events till resolution was reported in 39 out of 6 7
occurrences with outcome of resolved ;it ranged from 10 minutes 
to 1 month and 3 days, with a median value of 1 day. 
* Please see Appendix 5.1 for Observed versus Expected analysis of 
Facial paralysis /Facial paresis (Bell’s palsy) . 
Interval c onclusion: No ne w significant safety information was 
identified based on a review  of these cases, or of the Observed versus 
Expected analysis . Surveillance w ill continue.
Update to case series review presented in the second SMSR (reporting 
period 01 -31 January 2021): The 139 spontaneous reports resulting 
from the MedDRA version 23.1 search of the MAH safety database for 
PTs Facial paralysis or Facial paresis were reviewed for any updates 
in outcome resulting from follow -up activi ty through 26 Feb ruary 2021 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081237
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 58Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
(As-of date 27 Feb ruary 2021). Thirty of the 139 reports w ere 
reversioned due to updates and 2 reports w ere made invalid.  The 30 
reversioned reports w ere reviewed to understand the nature of the 
updates.  Of the 30 reversioned reports, 4 reports had a change in 
outcome:
AER , PT Facial paralysis was changed to Facial paresis 
and outcome changed from Not recovered to Recovering
AER , PT Facial paralysis outcome changed from Not 
recovered to Recovering
AER , PT Facial paralysis outcome changed from 
Unknown to Not recovered
AER PT Facial paralysis outcome changed from Not 
recovered to Unknown
These updates based on follow -up do not substantially change the 
MAH’s evaluation or conclusion. Follow-up efforts to obtain detail, 
including outcome for AEs, especially AESIs, reported for the vaccine 
are in place. Evaluations of facial palsy will continue to consider 
duration of facial paresis/paralysis and will propose updates to labeling 
language regarding facial palsy if warranted. 
Overall Conclusion: Taking all available information into 
consideration, including the unblinded clinical study C4591001 data 
(DLP 14 November 2020), the post- authori sation data and the 
comparison of observed case repor ts to the expected number of events 
(O/E analyses), the available information does not support a conclusion 
of a causal association between Bell’s palsy and the vaccine. This topic 
will continue to be monitored. Causality assessment will be further 
evaluated following availability of additional data from the remaining 
clinical study C4591001, w hich will be unblinded for final analysis 
approximately mid -April 2021. Additionally, non -interventional post -
authoris ation safety studies, C4591011 andC45910 12 are expected to 
capture data on a sufficiently large vaccinated population to detect an 
increased risk of Bell’s palsy in vaccinated individuals . The timeline 
for conducting these analyses will be established based on the size of 
the vaccinated populati on captured in the study data sources by the first 
interim reports (due 30 June 2021) . Study C4591021, pending protocol 
endorsement by EMA , is also intended to inform this risk.
Immune-Mediated/Autoimmune 
AESIs
Search criteria: Immune-
mediated/autoimmune disorders 
(SMQ) (Broad and Narrow) OR 
Autoimmune disorders HLGT 
(Primary Path) OR PTs Cytokine 
release syndrome; Cytokine storm;
HypersensitivityNumber of cases: 710 (3.0% of the total PM dataset, compared to 
2.5% of the previous reporting period), of w hich 518 m edically 
confirmed and 192 non -medically confirmed ;
Country of incidence (>10 cases): UK (174), US (107), France 
(68), Italy (63), Germany (48), Sw eden (33), Spain (31), Mexico 
(30), Greece (22), Austria (16), Czech Republic (14), Denmark 
(11). The remaining 93 cases were from 25 different countries.
Subject s’ gender (n=682): female (526), male (156).
Subject s’ age group (n=664): Adul tc(510), Elderlyd(152 
Adolescente(2).
Number of relevant events: 730, of which 582 serious, 148 
non‑serious.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
(b) (6)
(b) (6)
(b) (6)
(b) (6)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081238
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 59Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Most frequently reported relevant PTs (>10 occurrences): 
Hypersensitivity (374), Neuropathy peripheral *(35), Pericarditis *
(23), Myocarditis *(20), Encephalitis *(16), Dermatitis Bullous 
(12), Dermatitis, Psoriasis (11 each) ;
Relevant event onset latency (n = 580): Range from <24 hours to 
30 days, median 1 day.
Relevant event outcome:fresolved/resolving (359), not resolved 
(166), fatal (7), resolved w ith sequelae (15) and unknown (184).
* Please see Appendix 5.1for Observed/Expected analysis perfor med 
for Autoimmune thyroiditis, Encephal itis, Myasthenia gravis, Myelitis, 
Myocarditis , Neuropathy peripheral, Pericarditis , Type 1 diabetes 
mellitus .
Conclusion: No new s afety signals have emerged based on a review of 
these cases . The low er level of the confidence interval exceeds 1 for 
the cumulative and interval risk periods in the Observed versus 
Expected analysis for Myasthenia gravis and Peripheral neuropathy
and these events will b e reviewed and discussed in the next SMSR . 
Surveillance will continu e.
Musculoskeletal AESIs
Search criteria: PTs Arthralgia;
Arthritis; Arthritis bacterial ;o
Chronic fatigue syndrome;
Polyarthritis; Polyneuropathy;
Post viral fatigue syndrome ; 
Rheumatoid arthritisjNumber of cases: 2151 (9.1% of the total PM dataset , com pared to 
8.2% of the previous reporting period ), of w hich 1121 medically 
confirmed and 1030 non-medically confirmed;
Country of incidence: UK ( 827), US (340 ), Italy ( 241),Mexico 
(201), Portugal ( 70), Germany (54), France (46) ,Greece (44) , 
Czech Republic ( 30), Latvia (28), Poland (27), Spain and Sweden 
(20 each), Ireland (19), Austria, Belgium and Finland (18 each), 
Israel (15), Netherlands (14), Denmark (13), Romania (10), 
Bulgaria and Croatia (9 each), Cyprus (8), Canada, Hungary and 
Norw ay (6 each), Estonia and Serbia (5 each), Iceland, Puerto 
Rico and Slovakia ( 3 each), Costa Rica, Lithuania, Malta, Saudi 
Arabia a nd Slovenia (2 each); the remaining 5 cases originated 
from 5 different countries ;
Subject s’ gender (n= 2089 ): female ( 1653 ), male ( 436);
Subject s’ age group (n= 2027): Adultc(1656 ), Elderlyd(371);
Number of relevant events: 2173 , of which 1179 serious, 994
non-serious;
Reported relevant PTs: Arthralgia ( 2101 ), Arthritis ( 40), 
Rheumatoid arthritis *(20), Polyarthritis* (5), Chronic fatigue 
syndrome *(3), Polyneuropathy *(2)and Arthritis bacterial and 
Post viral fatigue syndrome * (1 each);
Relevant event onset latency (n = 1798 ): Range from <24 hours to 
32days, median 1 day ;
Relevant event outcome:fresolved/resolving ( 1103 ), resolved w ith 
sequelae ( 27), not resolved ( 533) and unknown ( 522).
* Observed/Expected analysis was performed for Rheumatoid arthritis, 
Polyarthritis, Chronic fatigue syndrome, Polyneuropathy and Post viral 
fatigue syndrome (see Appendix 5.1 ).
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081239
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 60Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Conclusion: No new s afety signals have emerged based on a review of 
these cases , orof the Observed versus Expected analysis .Surveillance 
will continue.
Neurological AESIs (including 
demyelination)
Search criteria: Convulsion s 
(SMQ) (Broad and Narrow) OR 
Demyelination (SMQ) (Broad and 
Narrow) OR PTs Ataxia;
Cataplexy; Encephalopathy ;j
Fibromyalgia; Intracranial 
pressure increased; Meningitis;
Meningitis aseptic; NarcolepsyNumber of cases: 394 ( 1.7% of the t otal PM dataset, compared to 
0.9% of the previous reporting period), of w hich 296 medically 
confirmed and 98 non -medically confirmed.
Country of incidence (>10 cases): UK (110), US (41), Germany 
(40), Italy (28), Mexico (26), France (24), Spai n (18), Polan d (17), 
Netherlands (15), Israel (11). The remaining 64 cases were from 
23 different countries.
Subject s’ gender (n=377): female (253), male (124).
Subject s’ age group (n=378): Adul tc(256), Elderlyd(122);
Number of relevant events: 42 6, of which 409 serious, 17 
non‑serious.
Most frequently reported relevant PTs ( ≥2occurrences) included: 
Seizure* (159), Epilepsy (7 3), Generalised tonic -clonic seizure *
(26), Guillain -Barre syndrome *(20), Febrile convulsion *, 
Trigeminal neuralgia (14), Fibromyalgia *(12), Status epilepticus 
(11), Myelitis transverse *and Tonic convulsion *(9 each), Optic 
neuritis *(8), Ataxia (7), Encephalopathy *, Petit mal epilepsy and 
Tonic clonic movements (6 each) ,Multiple sclerosis relapse *(5), 
Foam ing at mouth (4 ), Aura, Narcolepsy *, Partial seizures and 
Tongue biting (3 each) and Bad sensation, Clonic convulsion, 
Leukoencephalopathy , Meningitis *, Meningitis aseptic *, 
Myokymia, Postictal state and Seizure like phenomena (2 each) ;  
Relevant event onset latency (n = 342): Range from <24 hours to 
48 days, median 1 day ;
Relevant events outcom e: fatal (13), resolved/resolving (211), 
resolved with sequelae (8), not resolved (71) and unknown (125) ;
upon review, in the 11 cases reporting overall 13 neurological 
events with fatal outcome , the outcome of these neurological 
events was not relevant as the subjects died due to multiple or 
different causes ;
Most frequently reported relevant medical history (> 1 occurrence) 
Epilepsy (39), Seizure (14), Cer ebrovascular accident (8), 
Fibromyalgia (7), Trigeminal neuralgia (4), Cerebral haemorrhage, 
Cerebral infarction (3 each), Cerebral palsy, Generalised tonic -
clonic seizure, Myoclonus, Partial seizures, Petit mal epilepsy, 
Transient ischaemic attack (2 each ).
* Observed/Expected analysis was performed for Encephalopahty, 
Guillain -Barre syndrom e, Fibromyalgia, Meningitis , Multiple sclerosis,
Myelitis transverse, Narcolepsy, Optic neuritis and Seizure/Seizure 
disorders (see Appendix 5.1 ). A safety evaluation of Guillain -Barre 
syndrome was also conducted (see Appendix 3.6) .
Conclusion: No new safety signals have emerged from review of the 
cases . The low er level of the confidence interval exceeds 1 for the 
cumulative and interval risk periods in the Observed versus Expected 
analysis for Meningitis and Transverse myelitis and these event swill 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081240
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 61Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
be review ed and discussed in the next SMSR . Surveillance will 
continue.
Other AESIs
Search criteria: Herpes viral 
infections (HLT) (Primary Path) 
OR PTsAdverse event following 
immunisation; Inflammation;
Manufacturing laboratory 
analytical testing issue;
Manufacturing materials issue;
Manufacturing production issue;
MERS-CoV test; MERS-CoV test 
negative; MERS-CoV test positive;
Middle East respiratory 
syndrome;Multiple organ 
dysfunction syndrome;
Occupational exposure to 
communicable disease; Patient 
isolation; Product availability 
issue;Product distribution issue;
Product supply issue; Pyrexia;
Quarantine; SARS-CoV-1 test;
SARS-CoV-1 test negative; SARS-
CoV-1 test positiveNumber of cases: 4597 ( 19.5% of the total PM dataset, compared 
to 20.3% of the previous reporting period ), of which 2650 were 
medically confirmed and 1947 non -medically confirmed ;
Country of incidence (> 20 occurrences): UK (1475), US (716), 
Italy (586), Portugal (198), Mexico (191), France (176), Germany 
(145), Spain (135), Sw eden (117), Denmark (92), Greece (82), 
Poland (79), Czech Republic (72), Finland (49), Austria (47), 
Latvia , Norw ay (45 each), Belgium (40), Israel (38), Hungary 
(36), Croatia (34), Ireland (32), Romania (24) Netherlands (22). 
The remaining 121 cases were from 21 different countries ;
Subject s’ gender (n=4441): female (3427), male (1014) ;
Subject s’ age group (n= 4312): Adultc(3496), Elderlyd(803), 
Adolescente, Childh(5 each), Infantg(3);
Number of relevant events: 4666, of which 2691 serious, 1975 
non‑serious ;
Most frequently reported relevant PTs ( ≥5 occurrences) included: 
Pyrexia (4 272), Herpes zoster *(179), Inflammation (93), Oral 
herpes (50), Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome *(12), 
Ophthalmic herpes zoster *(10), Herpes simplex (8), Herpes virus 
infection (7), Herpes ophthalmic (6), Herpes zoster reactivation *
(5);
Relevant event onset latency (n = 2498 ): Range from <24 hours to 
32 days, median 1 day ;
Relevant events outcome:ffatal (69), re solved/resolving (2953), 
resolved with sequelae (50), not resolved (752) and unknown 
(877).
* Amo ng multiple different events grouped under this Other AESIs 
category, Observed/Expected analysis was performed on specific PTs 
relevant for Herpes zoster disorders andMultiple organ dysfunction 
syndrome (see Appendix 5.1 ).
Conclusion: No new safety signals have emerged based on a review of 
these cases , or of the Observed versus Expected analysis .Surveillance 
will continue .
Pregnancy Related AESIs
Search criteria: PTs Amniotic 
cavity infection; Caesarean 
section;Congenital anomaly;
Death neonatal; Eclampsia;
Foetal distress syndrome; Low 
birth weight baby; Maternal 
exposure during pregnancy;
Placenta praevia; Pre-eclampsia;
Premature labour; Stillbirth;
Uterine rupture; Vasa praeviaFor relevant cases ,please refer to the subsection Use in Pregnancy and 
While Breast Feeding inTable 12.
Renal AESIs
Search criteria: PTs Acute kidney 
injury;Renal failure.Number of cases: 45cases (0. 2% of the total PM dataset, 
compared to 0.1% of the previous reporting period), of w hich 36
medically confirmed, 9non-medically confirmed;
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081241
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 62Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Country of incidence: France (12), Germany (10), UK (6), Spain 
(4), Belgium and US (3 each), Italy (2) and Austria, Canada, 
Denmark, Finland and Luxembo urg (1 each); 
Subject s’ gender: female ( 29), male (16);
Subject s’ age group (n= 45): Adultc(6), Elderlyd(39);
Number of relevant events: 45, all serious;
Reported relevant PTs: Acute kidney injury * (24) and Renal 
failure * (21);
Relevant event onset latency (n = 28): Range from 24 hours to 15
days, median 4days;
Relevant event outcome: fatal (15), resolved/ resolving ( 7), not 
resolved (11) and unknown ( 12).
* Observed/Expected analysis performed for Acute kidney injury and 
Renal failure (see Appendix 5.1 ).
Conclusion: No new safety signals have emerged based on a review of 
these cases , or of the Observed versus Expected analysis performed . 
Surveillance will continue .
Respiratory AESIs
Search criteria: Lower respiratory 
tract infections NEC (HLT) 
(Primary Path) OR Respiratory 
failures (excl neonatal) (HLT) 
(Primary Path) OR Viral lower 
respiratory tract infections (HLT) 
(Primary Path) OR PTs: Acute 
respiratory distress syndrome;
Endotracheal intubation;
Hypoxia; Pulmonary 
haemorrhage; Respiratory 
disorder; Severe acute respiratory 
syndromeNumber of cases: 100cases ( 0.4% of the total PM dataset, 
compared to 0.2% of the previous reporting interval) , of which 82
medically confirmed;
Countr iesof incidence: France (17), Germany (12), United 
Kingdom (12), Spain (11), Italy (8), Belgium, United States (7 
each), Denmark 6), Norw ay (5), Czech Republic, Iceland (3 each); 
the remaining 9 cases originated from 6 different countries.
Subject s’ gender (n= 60):male ( 40).
Subject s’s age group (n= 97):Elderlyd(63), Adultc(33), 
Adolescente(1).
Number of relevant events: 100serious event s, 6non-serious .
Reported relevant PTs:Hypoxia, Respiratory failure ( 35 each), 
Respiratory disorder (26), Acute respiratory distress syndrome (7), 
Chronic respiratory syndrome (2 ), Severe acute respira tory 
syndrome ( 1).
Relevant event onset latency (n=80): range from < 24 hours to 1 8
days.
Relevant events outcome: fatal (30), Resolved/resol ving (4 1), not 
recovered ( 11)and unknown ( 24).
Out of these 100 cases, only2 (1 fatal and 1 medically significant ) 
in which the PT Respiratory failure (2)was reported in a context 
of vaccine lack of efficacy (PT: Drug ineffective) , were also 
reviewed among thepotential relevant cases for the Risk ‘VAED 
Including VAERD’ in Table 9.
* Observed/Expected analysis performed for Acute respiratory distress 
syndrome (see Appendix 5.1 ). 
Conclusion: No new safety signals have emerged based on a review of 
these cases , orof the Observed versus Expected analysis performed 
Surveillance will continu e.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081242
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 63Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Thromboembolic Events
Search criteria: Embolism and 
thrombosis (HLGT) (Primary 
Path),excluding PTs reviewed as 
Stroke AESIs, OR PTs Deep vein 
thrombosis; Disseminated 
intravascular coagulation;
Embolism; Embolism venous;
Pulmonary embolismNumber of cases: 114(0.5% of the total PM dataset, compared to 
0.2% of the previous reporting period), of w hich 86medically 
confirmed and 28non-medically confirmed;
Country of incidence: UK ( 23), France (20), US (18 ), Germany 
(11), Spain (6), Denmark ,Italy and Sweden (5 each), Belgium, 
Canada, Cyprus and Netherlands (2 each) ; the remaining 13 cases 
originated from 13 different countries;
Subject s’ gender (n= 112): female ( 69), male ( 43);
Subject s’ age group (n= 106): Adultc(55), Elderlyd(51);
Number of relevant events: 127, of w hich 125serious, 2
non-serious;
Most frequently reported relevant PTs ( 1 occurrence) included: 
Pulmonary embolism *(48), Thrombosis (28), Deep vein 
thrombosis * (23), Thrombo phlebitis superficial (6), Venous 
thrombosis limb (4), Thrombo phlebitis and Venous thrombosis (3 
each) and Blue toe syndrome and Microembolism (2 each);
Relevant event onset latency (n = 95): Range from <24 hours to 28
days, median 5 days;
Relevant event outcome: fatal ( 9), resolved/resolving (44), 
resolved with sequelae ( 4),not resolved (41) and unknown ( 29).
* Observed/Expected analysis performed for Deep vein thrombosis and 
Pulmonary embolism (see Appendix 5.1 ).
Conclusion: No new safety signals have emerged based on a review of 
these cases and of the Observed versus Expected analysis performed 
Surveillance will continue .
Strokep
Search criteria: HLT Central 
nervous system haemorrhages and 
cerebrovascular accidents 
(Primary Path) OR HLT 
Cerebrovascular venous and sinus 
thrombosis (Primary Path)Number of cases: 1 93(0.8% of the total PM dataset) )p, of which 
120medically confirmed and 73non-medically confirmed;
Country of incidence: US ( 46), U K (42), France (2 8), Germany 
(16), Norway (12), Netherlands and Spain (11 each), Sweden (6), 
Italy (3), Belgium, Denmark, Finland and Poland (2 each); the 
remaining 1 0cases originated from 10 different countries;
Subject s’ gender (n= 1 91): female ( 133), male ( 58);
Subject s’ age group (n=1 86): Adultc(38), Elderlyd(147), Childh,q
(1);
Number of relevant events: 209,all serious ;
Most frequently reported relevant PTs ( 1 occurrence) included: 
oPTs indicative of Ischaemic stroke: Cerebrovascular 
accident (111), Ischaemic stroke (30),Cerebral infarction 
(12), Cerebral thrombosis and Ischaemic cerebral 
infarction (3 each) and Basal ganglia stroke, Cerebral 
ischaemia, Cerebral venous sinus thrombosis and 
Thrombotic stroke (2 each);
oPTs indicative of Haemorrhagic stroke: Cerebral 
haemorrhage (19), Haemorrhagic stroke (7), Cerebral 
haematoma and Subarachnoid haemorrhage (4 each);
Relevant event onset latency (n = 164): Range from <24 hours to 
41days, median 2days;
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081243
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 64Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Relevant event outcome: fatal and resolved/resolving (44 each), 
resolved with sequelae ( 7), not resolved (4 9) and unknown ( 65). 
* Observed/Expected analysis was perfo rmed for Stroke disorders (see 
Appendix 5.1 ).
Conclusion: No new safety signals have emerged based on a review of 
these cases , or of the Observed versus Expected analysis performed .
Surveillance will continue.
Vasculitic Events
Search criteria: Vasculitides HLTNumber of cases: 26 cases (0.1% of the total PM dataset,
compared to 0.01% of the previous reporting period ), of w hich 21 
medically confirmed and 5 non -medically confirmed ;
Country of incidence: UK(10), France (4), Portugal (3), Spain and
US (2 each) and Cyprus, Germany, Hungary, Italy and Slovakia (1 
each);
Subject s’ gender: female (21), male (5);
Subject s’ age group (n=25): Adultc(13), Elderlyd(12);
Number of relevant events: 28, of which 21 serious, 7 non -serious ; 
Reported relevant PTs: Vasculitis *(12), Cutaneous vasculitis *(4), 
Vasculitic rash *(3), Behcet’s syndrome , Giant cell arteritis and 
Hypersensitivity vasculitis (2 each) and Palpable purpura, 
Peripheral ischaemia *and Takaya su’s arteritis (1 each);
Relevant event onset latency (n = 2 0): Range from 24 hours to 1 9
days, median 3days;
Relevant event outcome: resolved/resolving ( 12), not resolved ( 9) 
and unknown ( 7).
* Observed/Expected analysis was performed for Vasculitis and 
Cutaneous vasculitis disorders (see Appendix 5.1 ). 
No new  significant safety information was identified based on a review 
of these cases, or of the Observed versus Expected analysis . 
Surveillance will continue.
a.For the complete list of the AESIs, please refer to Appendix 5;
b.Please note that this corresponds to evidence from post -EUA/conditional marketing authoris ation 
approval data sources;
c.Subject s with age ranged between 18 and 64 years;
d.Subject s with age equal to or above 65 years;
e.Subject s with age ranged between 12 and less than 18 years;
f.Multiple episodes of the same PT event were reported w ith a differ ent clinical outcome within some 
cases hence the sum of the events outcome exceeds the total number of PT events;
g.Subject s with age ranged between 1 (28 days) and 23 months ;
h.Subject s with age ranged between 2 and 11 years;
i.To increase clinical relevance of the revie w, com pared to previous SMSR these PTs w ere m oved t o 
COVID -19 category;
j.To increase clinical relevance of the revie w, com pared to previous SMSR this PT w as moved from the 
Immune -mediated/Autoimmune Category to its appropriate specific body system category;
k.As per EMA PRAC assessment report received on the second SMSR, EMA has reques ted ananalysis of 
haemorrhagic disorders through review of PTs present in a specific SMQ query in addition to the PTs 
Haem orrhage and Haemorrhagic disorder already included in the AESIs/TME list; comparison with reporting 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081244
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 65Table 10.AESIsEvaluation for BNT162b2
AESIsa
CategoryPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationb
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
proportion of Haematological eve nts reported in the previous reporting period is therefore not applicable for 
this Category ;
l.Twenty-four additional cases were excluded from the analysis as they were not cases of peripheral facial 
nerve palsy (BC Category 5) because they described other disorders (stroke, cerebral haemorrhage or 
transient ischaemic attack ); 1 case w as excluded from the analysis because it was invalid due to an 
unidentifiable reporter;
m.If a case included both PT Facial paresis and PT Facial paralysis, only the PT Facial paralysis was 
considered in the descriptions of the events as it is most clinically important;
n.This UK case report received from the UK MHRA described a 1-year-old subject who received the 
vaccine, and had left postauricular ear pain that progressed to left -sided Bell’s palsy 1 day following 
vaccination that had not resolved at the time of the report ;
o.This PT not included in the AESIs/TME list w as included in the review as relevant for ACCESS 
protocol criteria;
p.New  search strategy was implemented since this third SMSR for Stroke to include, in addition to the PT 
Cerebrovascular accident already included in the AESIs/TME List, other reported PTs that are indicative of 
stroke and were not in t he previous search strategy, and to differentiate betw een ischemic and hemorrhagic 
strokes; for this reason the comparison with the reporting proportion of previous reporting period is not 
applicable for this AESI category ;
q.This UK case report received from the UK MHRA described a 7 -year-old female subject who received 
the vaccine and had stroke (unknown outcome); no follow -up is possible for clarification.
9.5.3.Evaluation of Special Situations
Table 11 below presents the evaluation of new information received during the current 
reporting period from post -marketing data sources for BNT162b2 in relation to special 
situations (Death, Lack of Ef ficacy  and Vaccine Interactions).
Table 11.Evaluation of Special Situations for BNT162b2
Topic Post-Marketing Cases Evaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Death Overview
Number of fatal cases: 79438(3.4% of the total PM dataset ,compared to 2.8% of the 
total PM cases received in the previous reporting period ) of which 652were 
medically confirmed and 142 non- medically confirmed;
Country of incidence: the majority were from France (140), Germany (132), UK 
(99), Norw ay (65), Sw eden (56), US (48), Netherlands (44), Belgium (41), Denmark 
(29), Spain (23) ; the remaining 117cases occurred in 21other countries.
Subject Gender: females ( 423), males ( 303), unknown ( 68);
                                                
38During the current re porting interval there were 8 additional cases reporting subjects’ death. How ever, 
they were excluded from further analysis in this subsection as the death was mentioned as an incidental 
information only in 3 cases, with none of the reported events present ing a fatal outcome; 2 cases were excluded 
as it was made invalid; and 3 cases reported foetal death and are review ed in Table 12under Use in Pregnancy 
and While Breas t Feeding .
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081245
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 66Table 11.Evaluation of Special Situations for BNT162b2
Topic Post-Marketing Cases Evaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Subject s’ Age: 19to 103 years (n = 722), mean = 82.7, median = 86;
Adults ( 68), Elderly ( 672), subject s with unknown age ( 54);
Causes of death most frequently reported ( ≥2%of total fatal cases ): Death (239), 
COVID -19 (70), Sudden death (68), General physical health deterioration (63), 
Pyrexia (51), Dyspnoea (42), Drug ineffective (37), Cardiac failure (35), Card iac 
arrest, Pneumonia (26 each), Oxygen saturation decreased (25), Myocardial 
infarction (23), Cerebrovascular accident (20), Respiratory failure, Vomiting (19 
each), Malaise (18), and COVID -19 pneumonia (16). 
PTs most frequently reported ( 2%events ): Death (240), COVID- 19 (94), Pyrexia 
(85), Sudden death (73), Dyspnoea, General physical health deterioration (70 each), 
and Drug ineffective (68).
Concomitant medications were reported in 343out of 794cases and the most 
frequently present ( ≥2%) are listed below :
Paracetamol (97), Furosemide (71), Acetylsalicylic acid (52), Oxazepam (41), 
Apixaban (38), Macrogol 3350/Potassium Chloride/Sodium Bicarbonate/Sodium 
Chloride (34), Atorvastatin, Mirtazapine (31 each), Omeprazole (29), Bisoprolol 
Fumarate (27), Bis oprolol, Colecalciferol (26 each), Pantoprazole, Ramipril (24 
each), Amlodipine, Levothyroxine Sodium, Potassium Chloride, Zopiclone (23 
each), Pantoprazole Sodium Sesquihydrate (22), Calcium Carbonate/Colecalciferol 
(21), Folic Acid, Lansoprazole (20 each ), Risperidone (19), and Fentanyl (16) .
Lot/Batch Number (#) information by Country wasavailable in 514 cases w ith no 
related quality issues identified during investigations of the impacted lot/batch 
number s. The list of Lot /Batch #smostfrequently repo rted ( >2% of total fatal cases) 
is presented hereinafter:
oLot # EM0477 in 130 cases from France (41), Germany (32), Netherlands 
(19), Norw ay (16), Belgium (12), Spain (6), Ireland (3), and Denmark (1) .
oLot # EJ6795 in 70 cases from France (29), Norw ay (22), Sweden (11), 
Netherlands (3), Germany, Finland (2 each), and Poland (1) .
oLot # EJ6796 in 49cases from Germ any (20), Norw ay (7), France (6), 
Sweden (5), Austria (4), Spain (3), Belgium, Finland, Hungary, and Iceland 
(1 each) .
oLot/Batch # EJ6788 in 41cases from France (38), Germany (2), and 
Netherlands (1).
oLot # EJ6797 in 29cases from Denmark (14), Austria, Italy (5 each), 
Germ any (3), Slovakia, and Slovenia (1 each) .
oLot # EJ6134 in 26cases from Sweden (7), Denmark (4), Netherlands, 
Finland (3 eac h), Hungary, France, Belgium (2), Slovenia, Slovakia, and 
Austria (1 each) .
oLot # EK9788 in 21 cases from Germany (9), Denmark (5), France (3), 
Poland (2), Belgium, and Italy (1 each) .
oLot # EL1484 in 21 cases from Sweden (12), Italy (6), Portugal (2), and
Hungary (1) .
oLot # EL1491 in 17 cases from Germany (5), Austria (3), Croatia, Poland, 
Spain (2 each), Czech Republic, Finland, and Greece (1 each) .
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081246
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 67Table 11.Evaluation of Special Situations for BNT162b2
Topic Post-Marketing Cases Evaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Time to onset of fatal events was reported for 602subject s and ranged from the day 
of vaccination to 41days after vaccination:
oSame day  to 3 days after vaccination: 327 cases
o4-7 days after vaccination: 155 cases
o8-14 days after vaccination: 83cases
o15-41days after vaccination: 37cases
Number of vaccine doses administered at the time of the subject s’ death: in 390
cases the death occurred after the administration of the first dose, in 108cases the 
fatal outcome was observed after the administration of the second dose w hereas in 
the remaining cases (2 96) it was not specified if the subject s received the first or the 
second vaccine dose at the time of the fatal events.
Test for COVID- 19 w asreported for 234 subject s as follows: in 118cases subject s 
tested positive (72after 1st vaccine dose, 7after 2nd vaccine dose and in 39there 
was no informatio navailable about the dose they received) , in 107were negative, 2 
cases reported prior history of positive COVID -19 test, and in 7cases test results 
were unknown.
Analysis
Most of the cases reporting a fatal outcome (7 4.9%) w ere in subjects over 75 years of 
age. This reflects one of the priority groups targeted for vaccination by many regions and 
countries, including Europe and the US , that is, elderly (with various lower age cut -offs 
across countries), because of their higher risk of severe disease and mortality if infected 
with SARS -CoV-2.12,13
Among the total of 794cases with a fatal outcome, when the medical history was 
provided (in 624cases), the majority had multiple concomitant comorbidities. The mos t 
frequently reported medical conditions included cardiac and vascular disorders (eg 
Hypertension, Atrial fibrillation, Cardiac failure, Cerebrovascular accident, Myocardial 
ischaemia, Myocardial infarction ). Other frequently reported significant medical histories 
included Dem entia/Dementia Alzheimer's type, Chronic kidney disease, Renal failure, 
Diabetes mellitus /Type 2 diabetes mellitus, and Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease . 
Some of the subject s (16.5%) who received the vaccine a lready had general physical 
deterioration, w ere bedridden, w ere living in residential institutions, or on palliative care . 
No specific pattern regarding underlying condition sor cause of death have been 
identified. Further reports w ill continue to be close ly monitored.
Please see Appendix 5.1 for Observed versus Expected analysis of Death. 
Conclusion: No new risks were identified following review of the signal of death, 
particularly in the comorbid elderly population.
Lack of Efficacy Company conventions for coding cases indicative of lack of efficacy :
The coding conventions for lack of efficacy in the context of administration of 
the COVID- 19 vaccine was revised on 12 February 2021, as shown below: PT 
“Vaccination failure” is coded when ALL of the following criteria are met:
oThe subject has received the appropriate series of tw o doses based on 
the labeling.
oAt least 7 days have elapsed since the second dose of vaccine has been 
administered.
oThe subject experiences SARS -CoV- 2 infection (confirmed laboratory 
tests).
PT “Drug ineffective” i s coded when e ither of the following applies: 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081247
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 68Table 11.Evaluation of Special Situations for BNT162b2
Topic Post-Marketing Cases Evaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
o The infection is not confirmed as SARS-CoV -2 through laboratory tests 
(irrespective of the vaccination schedule). This includes scenarios where LOE 
is stated or impl ied, e.g., “the vaccine did not work”, “I got COVID-19”.
oIt is unknown:
Whether the subject has received the appropriate series of two 
doses in correct timing based on the labeling instructions;
How  many days have passed since the first dose (including 
unspecified number of days like a”a few days”, “some days”, 
etc.);
If 7 days have passed since the second dose of the vaccine 
administration;
oThe subject experiences a vaccine preventable illness 14 days after 
receiving the first dose up to and through 6 days after receipt of the 
second dose.
Note: after the immune system as had sufficient time (14 days) to respond to the vaccine, 
this is considered a potential lack of efficacy even if the vaccinati on course is not 
complete.
This is the summary of the coding conventions for onset of vaccine preventable disease 
versus the vaccination date:
1stdose (day 1 -13) From day 14 post 1stdose 
to day 6 post 2nddoseDay 7 post 2nddose
Code only the events 
describing the SARS -CoV -
2 infectionCode “Drug ineffective” Code “Vaccination failure”
Secenario Not considered 
LOEScenario considered LOE 
as “Drug ineffective”Scenario considered LOE as 
“Vaccination failure”
Lack of efficacy cases
Number of cases39: 856 ( 3.6% of the total PM dataset, compared to 7 .2% of the 
previous reporting period) of which 572were medically confirmed and 284
non - medically confirmed;
Number of lack of efficacy events: 8 56[PT: Drug ineffective (840) and Vaccination 
failure (16) ].
Country of incidence: US ( 233), UK ( 180), Germany (1 20), France (8 0), Italy (52), 
Belgium, Romania ( 28 each), Poland (20), Spain ( 19), Austria , Israel (16 each), 
Greece (14), Portugal ( 9), Denmark (7), Mexico ( 6), Czech Republic, Sweden (4 
each); the remaining 20cases originated from 11different countries.  
                                                
39One hundred and ninety -six(196) additional cases retrieved in this dataset were excluded from the 
analysis ; upon review, 188 cases cannot be considered true lack of efficacy cases because the PT Drug 
ineffective was coded but the subjects dev eloped SARS -CoV -2 infection during the early days from the first 
dose (days 1 –13); the vaccine has not had sufficient time to stimulate the immune system and, consequently, 
the development of a vaccine preventable disease during this time is not consider ed a potential lack of effect of 
the vaccine; in 5 cases the PT Drug ineffective was removed after DLP because  the subjects did not develop 
COVID -19 infection ; in 1 case, reporting Treatment failure and Transient ischaemic attack, the Lack of efficacy 
PT did not refer to BNT162b2 vaccine; 2 cases have been invalidated in the safety database after DLP.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081248
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 69Table 11.Evaluation of Special Situations for BNT162b2
Topic Post-Marketing Cases Evaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
COVID -19 infection was confirmed in 79 1cases, suspected in 6 4cases, in 1 case it 
was reported that the first dose was no effective (no other information).
COVID -19 infection (suspected or confirmed) outcome was reported as 
resolved/resolving ( 100), not resolved (1 21) or unknown ( 591) at the time of the 
reporting ;there were 44cases where a fatal outcome was reported (see also Death
section above in this table).
Drug ineffective cases (8 40)40
Drug ineffective seriousness: serious ( 833), non -serious ( 7)41;
Lack of efficacy term was reported:
oafter the 1stdose in 427cases 
oafter the 2nddose in 106cases
oin 307cases it w as unknown after which dose the lack of efficacy occurred.
Latency of lack of efficacy term reported after the first dose was known for 119
cases:
oWithin 0 ad7 days: 1 subject ;
oWithin 14and 21days: 1 04subject s;
oWithin 23and 50days: 14subject s;
Latency lack of efficacy term reported after the second dose was known for 50
cases:
oWithin 0 and 7days: 28subject s;
oWithin 8 and 21days: 17subject s;
oWithin 23 and 36 days: 5 subject s.
Latency of lack of efficacy term reported in cases (307) where the number of doses 
administered w as not provided, w as known in 1 94cases:
oWithin 0 and 7 days after vaccination: 1 21subject s.
oWithin 8 and 14 days after vaccination: 46subject s.
oWithin 15 and 44daysafter vaccination: 27 subject s.
According to the RSI, individuals may not be fully protected until 7 days after their 
second do se of vaccine, therefore for the above 840 cases where lack of efficacy was 
reported after the 1stdose or the 2nddose, the reported events may represent signs and 
symptoms of intercurrent or undiagnosed COVID -19 infection or infection in an 
individual who was not fully vaccinated, rather than vaccine ineffectiveness. 
Vaccination failure cases (16)
Vaccination failure seriousness: all serious;
Lack of efficacy term was reported in all cases after the 2nddose:
Latency of lack of efficacy term was known for all cases:
oWithin 7 and 14 days: 1 0subject s;
oWithin 1 5and 2 9days: 6subject s.
COVID -19 (10) and Asymptomatic COVID -19 (6) were the r eported vaccine 
preventable infections occurred in these 16 cases.
                                                
40There w ere 837 PTs Drug ineffective; in 3 additional cases the LOE PT has been reco ded from 
Vaccination failure t oDrug ineffective after DLP.
41Event seriousness of PTs , indicative o f possible lack of therapeutic effect captured at the DLP, w as 
upgraded to serious as per case processing convention at completion of the case. 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081249
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 70Table 11.Evaluation of Special Situations for BNT162b2
Topic Post-Marketing Cases Evaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Conclusion: No new safety signals have emerged based on a review of these cases.
Vaccine 
InteractionsNumber of cases: 7(0.03% of the total PM dataset , compared to 0.0 8% of the 
previous reporting period ) of which, 4cases were medically confirmed and 3cases 
were non -medically confirmed.
Country of incidence: US ( 3), Portugal , Spain , Switzerland, UK (1 each).
Subject Gender: Female ( 4)andMale ( 3);
Subject s’ Age: 3 2to 80 years; (n=7); mean=5 0.6; median 49.0;
Relevant reported interaction PTs: Drug interaction ( 6) and Alcohol interaction (1);
Relevant event seriousness: Serious ( 4) and Non -serious ( 3);
Relevant event outcome: Resolved /Resolving (2), Not resolved (1), and Unknown 
(4);
Co-reported events coded to the PTs (>1 event): Headache , Off -label use, and 
Product use issue (2). 
Reported Interacting Agents: adalimumab, alcohol, clozapine, insulin, lamotrigine, 
ocrelizumab, paroxetine, PEG, and w arfarin.
Conclusion: there is no indication of a safety signal of interference of immune response 
of va ccines noted based on a review of these cases.
a.Please note that this corresponds to evidence from post -EUA/conditional marketing authorisation 
approval data sources.
9.5.4.Evaluation of Missing Information
Table 12 below summari ses the evaluation of new information received during the current 
reporting period from post -marketing data sources7in relation to the Missing information
associated with the use ofBNT162b2 .
Table 12.Evaluation of Missing Information for BNT162b2
Missing Inform ationPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Use in Pregnancy and 
While Breast 
FeedingbNumber of cases: 153c(0.6% of the total PM dataset, compared to 1.4% of the 
previous reporting period) of which 74 w ere m edically confirmed and 79 w ere 
non-medically confirmed;
Country of incidence: UK (50), US (38), Germany (15), Canada (8), Italy (7), 
Israel (6), Ireland, Mexico (5 each), Hungary (4), Portugal (3), Czech Republic, 
Poland (2 each), Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, 
Rom ania, and Spain (1 each ). 
Pregnancy cases: 121 cases including:
117 mother cases and 4 foetus/baby cases representing 117 unique pregnancies 
(the 4 foetus/baby cases were linked to 3 mother cases; 1 mother case involved 
twins)
Pregnancy outcomes for the 117 pregnancies were re ported as spontaneous 
abortiond(18), spontaneous abortion w ith intrauterine death, premature birth 
with neonatal death (2 each ), spontaneous abortion w ith neonatal death (1), and 
no outcome was provided for 95 pregnancies (note that 2 different outcomes 
were reported for the tw ins and both w ere counted)
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081250
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 71Table 12.Evaluation of Missing Information for BNT162b2
Missing Inform ationPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
47 non -serious mother cases reported exposure to vaccine in utero w ithout the 
occurrence of any clinical event. The exposure PTs coded to the PTs Maternal 
exposure during pregnancy (35), Exposure during pregnancy (11), and Maternal 
exposure timing unspecif ied (1). Trimester of exposure was reported in 7 of 
these cases: 1st trimester (5 cases), 2nd trimester, and 3rd trimester (1 case 
each)
70 mother cases, 15 non -serious and 55 serious, reported additional clinical 
events, which occurred in the vaccinated m others. Pregnancy related events 
reported in these cases coded to the PTs Spontaneous abortion (17), Abortion, 
Abortion missed, and Foetal death (1 each). Other clinical events which 
occurred in more than 5 cases coded to the PTs Headache (24), Pain in 
extremity (13), Fatigue (12), Nausea, Pyrexia, Vaccination site pain (8 each), 
Chills, Myalgia, Pain (7 each), Arthralgia, and Asthenia (6 each). Trimester of 
exposure was reported in 17 of these cases: 1sttrimester (13 cases), 2ndtrimester 
(3 cases), 3rdtrimester (1 case).
4 serious foetus/baby cases reported the PTs Exposure during pregnancy, Foetal 
grow th restriction, Maternal exposure during pregnancy, Premature baby (2 
each), and Death neonatal (1). Trimester of exposure was reported for 2 cases 
(twins) as occurring during the 1sttrimester. 
Breast feeding baby cases : 31, of which:
25 cases reported exposure to vaccine during breastfeeding (PT Exposure 
via breast milk) without the occurrence of any clinical events;
6 cases, 3 serious and 3 non -serious, reported 7 additional clinical events 
that occurred in the infant/child exposed to vaccine via breastfeeding; these 
events coded to the PTs Illness (2), Diarrhoea, Pain, Pyrexia, Rash, and 
Urticaria (1 each).
Breast f eeding mother cases :
1 serious case reported 3 clinical events that occurred in a mother during 
breast feeding (PT Maternal exposure during breast feeding); these events 
coded to the PTs Chills, Malaise, and Pyrexia. 
Conclusion: There w ere no safety sign als that emerged from the review of these 
cases of use in pregnancy and while and breast feeding. 
Use in 
Immunocompromised 
PatientseNumber of cases: 941(4.0% of the total PM dataset, compared to 2.1% of the 
previous reporting period) of which 369were medically confirmed and 572
non-medically confirmed;
Case Seriousness: Serious ( 758), Non -Serious ( 183);
Country of incidence: UK ( 534), US (175 ), France (78), Italy (18), Germany 
(15), Denmark and Spain (11 each), Norw ay and Sweden (10 each), Austria and 
Portugal (9 each), Belgium (7), Czech Republic, Israel and Netherlands (6 
each), Greece (5), Ireland (4), Estonia, Finland and Slovakia (3 each), Bulgar ia, 
Hungary, Malta, Mexico and Poland (2 each); the remaining 8cases originated 
from 8different countries;
Gender: females ( 705), males ( 221) and unknown ( 15);
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081251
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 72Table 12.Evaluation of Missing Information for BNT162b2
Missing Inform ationPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
Age (n = 891) ranged from 18 to 100years, mean = 5 7.7years , median = 5 7 
years ;
Relevant patients’ medical histories most frequently reported ( ≥20 cases) coded 
to the PTs: Immunodeficiency (273), Breast cancer (119), Neoplasm malignant 
(58), Chemotherapy (56), Neoplasm (51), Radiotherapy (42), Prostate cancer 
(34), Hysterectomy (33), Thyroidectomy (32), Splenectomy (31), Lymphoma 
(24), Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (23) and Renal transplant (20);
Of the 4561events overall reported, the most frequent clinical events (≥60 
occurrences) coded to the PTs: Headache ( 241), Fatigue ( 225), Pyrexia ( 145), 
Nausea ( 141), Myalgia and Pain in extremity ( 112 each), Chills ( 106), 
Dizziness ( 102), Malaise (98), Vaccination site pain (87), Pain (85), Arthralgia 
(69), Dyspnoea (66) and Diarrhoea ( 60); 
Case outcome: fatal ( 36, see Table 11, Death ), resolved/resolving ( 442), 
resolved with sequelae ( 23), not resolved ( 359) and unknown ( 81).
Conclusion: The most frequently reported clinical events observed in 
immunocompromised subject s were consistent with those observed in the overall 
population. The reporting proportion of unresolved cases (3 8.2%) and cases 
resolved with sequelae (2. 4%) in patients in immunocompromised subject sis 
slightly higher compared to the reporting proportion observed in the overall 
population (27.2% for outcome of not resolved, 1.4% for outcome of resolved with 
sequelae), while the re porting proportion of cases with fatal outcome in 
immunocompromised subject s (3.8%) is similar to the reporting proportion of cases 
with fatal outcome in the overall population (3.4%).
No safety signals have emerged that w ould be considered specific to thi s population .
Use in Patients With 
Autoimmune or 
Inflammatory 
DisorderseNumber of cases: 1490 (6.3% of the total PM dataset, compared to 6.1% of the 
previous reporting period) of which 721 w ere m edically confirmed and 769 
non-medically confirmed;
Case Seriousness: Serious (1009), Non -Serious (481);
Country of incidence: UK (586), US (403), France (84), Italy (76), Sw eden 
(35), Germany (32), Portugal (31), Spain (27), Austria (26), Denmark (21), 
Czech Republic (19), Croatia (17), Ireland (15), Finland (14), Greece (13), 
Hungary and Israel (12 each), Norw ay (7), Canada and Romania (6 each), 
Belgium, Malta and Netherlands (5 each), Cyprus, Mexico and Poland (4 each), 
Bulgaria, Estonia, Slovakia and Slovenia (3 each) and Iceland and Latvia (2 
each); the r emaining 5 cases originated from 5 different countries;
Gender: Females (1269), Males (195) and Unknown (26);
Age (n = 1416 ) ranged from 1 8to 104 years, mean = 52. 9years, 
median = 51 .5years;
Relevant subject s’ medical histories most frequently reported (20cases) coded 
to the PTs: Hypothyroidism (295), Rheumatoid arthritis (209), Arthritis (120), 
Autoimmune thyroiditis (105), Crohn’s disease (74), Colitis ulcerative (69), 
Thyroid disorder (67), Inflammatory bowel disease (65), Multiple sclerosis 
(59), Type 1 diabetes mellitus (58), Coeliac disease (53), Psoriasis (48), 
Systemic lupus erythematosus (41), Psoriatic arthropathy (39), Autoimmune 
disorder (31), Sjogren's syndrome and Raynaud's phenomenon (28 each) and 
Ankylosing spondylitis (24); 
Of the 681 9 events overall reported, the most frequent ( ≥65 occurrences) coded 
to the PTs: Headache (434), Fatigue (357), Pyrexia (247), Nausea (232), 
Arthralgia (214), Vaccination site pain (197), Chills (196), Myalgia (174), 
Dizziness (163), Pain in extremity (160 ), Pain (134), Malaise (111), Diarrhoea 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081252
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 73Table 12.Evaluation of Missing Information for BNT162b2
Missing Inform ationPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
(109), Asthenia (99), Paraesthesia (76), Lymphadenopathy (75), Dyspnoea (66) 
and Vomiting (65);
Case outcome: fatal (13 see Table 11, Death ), resolved/resolving (76 5), 
resolved with sequelae (34), not resolved (555) and unknown (123).
Conclusion: The most frequently reported clinical events observed in subject s with 
autoim mune or inflammatory disorders w ere consistent with those observed in the 
overall population. The reporting proportion of unresolved cases (37.2%) and cases 
resolved with sequelae (2.3%) in subject s with autoimmune or inflammatory 
disorders is slightly higher compared to the reporting proportion observed in the 
overall population (27.2% for outcome of not resolved, 1.4% for outcome of 
resolved with sequelae), while the reporting proportion of cases with fatal outcome 
in subject s with autoimmune or inflammat ory conditions (0.9%) is below  the 
reporting proportion of cases with fatal outcome in the overall population (3.4%).
No safety signals have emerged that would be considered specific to this population
Use in Frail Patients 
With Co -morbidities 
(e.g. COPD,
Diabetes, Chronic 
Neurological Disease, 
Cardiovascular 
Disorders)eNumber of cases: 252 1f(10.7% of the total PM da taset, compared to 9.2% of 
the previous reporting period) of which 1602 were medically confirmed and 
919non-medically confirmed;
Case Seriousness: Serious ( 2008 ), Non -Serious (5 13);
Country of incidence: UK (735), US (49 2), France (337), Sweden (149), 
Germ any (126), Spain (113), Italy (80), Norw ay (76), Denmark (63), Finland 
(40), Netherlands (37), Austria (36), Ireland and Portugal (35 each), Belgium 
(33), Greece (18), Czech Republic (17), Canada and Switzerland (10 each) , 
Israel (9), Hungary (8), Croatia, Iceland and Romania (7 each), Malta and 
Mexico (6 each), Estonia (5), Cyprus and Latvia (4 each), United Arab 
Emirates (3), Luxembourg and Serbia (2 each); the remaining 9 cases originated 
from 9 different countries;
Gender: Females (17 19), Males (774) and Unknown (28);
Age (n = 245 7) ranged from 5 to 106 years, mean = 66.5 years , 
median = 72 years ;
Relevant subject s’ medical histories most frequently reported ( 20 cases) coded 
to the PTs : Asthma (880), COPD (242), Dementia (240), Cardiac failure (179), 
Dem entia Alzheimer’s type (151), Chronic kidney disease (125), Cognitive 
disorder (90), Parkinson’s disease (73), Pulmonary embolism (63), Renal 
failure (59), Vascular dementia (45), Cardia c failure congestive (28) and 
Bronchiectasis (26); 
Of the 103 17events overall reported, the most frequent ( ≥100 occurrences) 
coded to the PTs: Pyrexia (430), Headache (427), Fatigue (390), Dyspnoea 
(284), Nausea (268), Chills (225), Malaise (20 1), Dizzin ess (19 4), Myalgia 
(189), Vaccination site pain (167), Pain in extremity (15 7), Pain (152), 
Vom iting (147), Arthralgia (143), Asthenia (142 ), Diarrhoea (118), Death (10 7) 
and Cough (100); all these events were consistent with the most frequent events 
obser ved in the overall population except for Death;
Case outcome: fatal (43 8, see Table 11, Death ), resolved/resolving (1158), 
resolved with sequelae (47), not resolved (693 ) and unknown (185).
Conclusion: The reporting proportion of not resolved cases (27.5%) and cases 
resolved with sequelae (1.9%) in frail subject s is similar to the reporting proportion 
observed in the overall population (27.2% for outcome of not resolved, 1.4% for 
outcome of resolved with sequelae). 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081253
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 74Table 12.Evaluation of Missing Information for BNT162b2
Missing Inform ationPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
The reporting proportion of cases reporting fatal outcome (17.4%) in frail subject s is 
higher than the reporting proportion of cases reporting fatal outcome in the overall 
population (3.4%). This is expected, considering that m ost of the cases reporting a 
fatal outcome (8 2.9%) among the frail subject s involved subjects over 75 years of 
age who, due to their advanced age and underlying comorbidities ,are m ore likely to 
die than younger individuals. Underlying comorbidities are likely to be contributory 
to their deaths. 
As per EMA PRAC assessment report (Product No. EMEA/H/C/005735/MEA/002.1) 
received on the second SMSR, t he MAH was requested to discuss if there is a higher 
risk on worsened outcome in the particularly frail or elderly patients with 
underlying morbidities, who are reporting diarrhoea and/or vomiting .
The reporting proportion of cases reporting Diarrhoea and/or Vomiting ( 9.4%) in 
these frail or elderly subject s with underlying morbidities is similar to the reporting 
proportion observed in the overall population ( 8.2%); there was no difference in the 
incidence of serious occurrences (63.8% in frail or elderly subject s with und erlying 
morbidities versus 61.3% of serious occurrences in the overall population) and in 
the reporting proportion of cases in which these events had an outcome of not 
resolved or resolved w ith sequelae, respectively 16.4 % and 1. 3% in frail subject s, 
versus 18. 3% and 1.6% in the overall population. The reporting proportion of cases 
in which Diarrhoea and/or Vomiting had a fatal outcome is higher (10.1%) in frail 
subject s than in the overall population (1.7%) ;the cases with fatal outcome involved 
24 su bjects w ith age ranged from 74 to 96 years (me an87.5 years, median 89 years) 
and they had multiple underlying co -morbidities that are likely to be contributory to 
their deaths.
Conclusion: Overall, no risks based on subject frailty have been identified for the 
vaccine. Pfizer recognizes that severe vomiting and diarrhea may have negative 
clinical consequences, especially in medically frail subject s. As with all 
vaccinations, the full safety and efficacy profile of the vaccin e should be considered 
in the context of the health of the individual subject when determining the benefit 
risk of vaccination.
Interaction With 
Other VaccineseThere w ere no cases reporting an interaction with other vaccines during the reporting 
interval (please refer to Table 11, Vaccine Interactions ).
Long -Term  Safety 
DataNot applicable 
Use in Paediatric 
Individuals <16 
Years of AgegNumber of cases: 26h(0.1% of the total PM dataset, as in the previous 
reporting period), of which 11 w ere m edically confirmed and 15 w ere non -
medically confirmed, and indicative of administration in paediatric subjects 
<16 years of age;
Country of incidence: UK (19), US (4), Germany (2), Israel (1);
Cases Seriousness: Serious (16), Non -Serious (10);
Gender: Females (20), Males (3), Unknown (3);
Age (n=26) ranged from 2 months to 15 years, mean = 6.2, median = 5;
Case outcome: resolved/resolving (10), not resolved, and unknown (8 
each).
Of the 92 reported events,
oThe most frequently reported event s (>1 case) w ere coded to the 
PTs Product administered to patient of inappropriate age (20 , see 
Section 7Medication Errors ), Off label use (12), Product use 
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081254
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 75Table 12.Evaluation of Missing Information for BNT162b2
Missing Inform ationPost-Marketing Case sEvaluationa
Total Number of Cases in the Reporting Period (N= 23558)
issue (4), Fatigue, Nausea, Pyrexia (3 each), COVID -19, Facial 
paralysis, Headache, Lymphadenopathy, Swelling, and 
Vaccination site pain (2 each)
oThere w ere 26 unlisted event s reported in 9cases:
These events coded to the PTs Facial paralysis, Swelling 
(2 each), Blepharospasm, Cellulitis, Cerebrovascular 
accident, C hest discomfort, Diarrhoea ,iExternal ear pain, 
Feeling hot, Hypertension, Mastitis, Muscle spasms, 
Myoclonus, Neuralgia, Pain in extremity,iPain in jaw , 
Paraesthesia, Paraesthesia oral, Peripheral sw elling, Poor 
quality sleep, Post laminectomy syndrom e, Rhinorrhoea, 
Vaccination site pruritus, and Wheezing (1 each).
All of these cases were received from the MHRA and 
provided limited information (i.e., medical history, 
concomitant medications, actions taken, or clinical 
outcome not provided).
No new significant safety information was identified based on a review  of these cases.
Vaccine 
effectivenessgRelevant cases for vaccine effectiveness during the reporting interval are reviewed in
Table 11, Lackof Efficacy .
a.Please note that this corresponds to evidence from post -EUA/conditional marketing authorisation 
approval data sources;
b.Missing information as per both the EU -RMP Version 1.0, dated 21 December 2020 and the US PVP, 
Version 0. 3, dated 20 January 2021;
c.Five cases were excluded from the analysis; pregnancy was not confirmed in 4 cases and 1 case w as 
invalid for unidentifiable reporter ;
d.Birth type of spontaneous abortion was added to 7 cases after the data -lock point;  
e.Missing information as per the EU -RMP Version 1.0, dated 21 December 2020;
f.One additional case was excluded from the discussion as found as invalid upon review;
g.Missing information as per the US PV P, Version 0. 3, dated 20January 2021;
were excluded from analysis as the data reported (e.g., clinical details, height, w eight, etc.) w ere not 
consistent for paediatric subjects;
h.  Upon rev iew, 27 cases were excluded from analysis as the data reported (e.g. clinical details, height,
weight, etc.) w ere not consistent with paediatric subject s;other paediatric cases, including the one involving 
a 2-month-old subject, might be reported w ith a miscoded pediatric age however, since they reported limited 
details and no follow -up is possible for clarification, they were conservatively discussed in this section;
i.Added to the CDS af ter the data -lock point of this SMSR, on 02 March 2021.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081255
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 7610.OVERALL BENEFIT -RISK EVALUATION 
10.1.Benefits
BNT162b2 is indicated for active immunisation to prevent COVID -19 caused by  
SARS -CoV -2 virus, in individuals 16 years of age and older.
In the Phase 2/3 portion, approximately  44,000 participants were randomised equall y and 
were to receive 2 doses of COVID -19 mRNA Vaccine or placebo (normal saline) separated 
by 21 day s. The efficacy  anal yses included participants that received their second vaccination 
within 19 to 42 day s after their first vaccination. Participants are planned to be followed for 
up to 24 months after Dose 2, for assessments of safet y and efficacy against COVI D-19. 
The population for the analy sis of the primary  efficacy  endpoint included 36,621 participants 
12 years of age and older (18,242 in the COVID -19 mRNA Vaccine group and 18,379 in the 
placebo group) who did not have evidence of prior infection with SARS -CoV -2 through 7 
days after the second dose. In addition, 134 par ticipants were between the ages of 16 to 17 
years of age (66 in the COVID -19 mRNA Vaccine group and 68 in the placebo group) and 
1616 participants 75 years of age and older (804 in the COVID -19 mRNA Vaccine group 
and 812 in the placebo group).
At the time of the primary efficacy  anal ysis, participants had been followed for s ymptomatic 
COVID -19 for in total 2,214 person- years for the COVID -19 mRNA Vaccine and in total 
2,222 person- years in the placebo group. There were no meaningful clinical differences in 
overall vaccine efficacy  in participants who were at risk of severe COVID- 19 including those 
with 1 or more comorbidities that increase the risk of severe COVID -19 (e.g. asthma, bod y 
mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m2, chronic pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension).
The vaccine efficacy  information is presented in Table 13.
Table 13.Vaccine efficacy –First COVID -19 occurrenc e from 7 days after Dose 2, 
by age subgroup –participants without evidence of infection prior to 7 
days after Dose 2 –evaluable efficacy (7 days) population
First COVID -19 occurrence from 7 days after Dose 2 in participants without evidence of 
prior SARS-CoV-2 infection*
Subgroup COVID-19 mRNA 
Vaccine
Na=18,198Cases
n1b
Surveillance timec
(n2d)Placebo
Na=18,325Cases
n1b
Surveillance timec
(n2d)Vaccine efficacy
% (95% CI)f
  All subjectse8
2.214 (17,411)162
2.222 (17,511)95.0 (90. 0, 97.9)
  16 to 64 years 7
1.706 (13,549)143
1.710 (13,618)95.1 (89.6, 98.1)
  65 years and older 1
0.508 (3848)19
0.511 (3880)94.7 (66.7, 99.9)
  65 to 74 years 1
0.406 (3074)14
0.406 (3095)92.9 (53.1, 99.8)
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081256
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 77Table 13.Vaccine efficacy –First COVID -19 occurrenc e from 7 days after Dose 2, 
by age subgroup –participants without evidence of infection prior to 7 
days after Dose 2 –evaluable efficacy (7 days) population
First COVID -19 occurrence from 7 days after Dose 2 in participants without evidence of 
prior SARS-CoV-2 infection*
Subgroup COVID-19 mRNA 
Vaccine
Na=18,198Cases
n1b
Surveillance timec
(n2d)Placebo
Na=18,325Cases
n1b
Surveillance timec
(n2d)Vaccine efficacy
% (95% CI)f
  75 years and older 0
0.102 (774)5
0.106 (785)100.0 ( -13.1, 100.0)
Note: Confirmed cases were determined by Reverse Transcription -Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT -PCR) 
and at least 1 symptom consistent with COVID -19 [* Case definition: (at least 1 of) fever, new  or increased 
cough, new or increased shortness of breath, chills, ne w or increased muscle pain, new loss of taste or smell, 
sore throat, diarrhoea or vomiting.]
*Participants who had no serological or virological evidence (prior to 7 days after receipt of the last dose) 
of past SARS -CoV -2 infection (i.e., N -binding antibody [serum] negative at Visit 1 and S ARS -CoV -2 not 
detected by nucleic acid amplification tests  (NAAT) [nasal swab] at Visits 1 and 2), and had negative NAAT 
(nasal swab) at any unscheduled visit prior to 7 days after Dose 2 were included in the analysis.
a. N = number of participants in the specified group.
b.n1=Number of participants meeting the endpoint definition.
c.Total surveillance time in 1000 person -years for the given endpoint across all subjects w ithin each group 
at risk for the endpoint. Time period for COVID -19 case accrual is from 7 days after Dose 2 to the end of the 
surveillance period.
d.n2=Number of subjects at risk for the endpoint.
e.No confirmed cases were identified in participants 12 to 15 years of age.
f.Confidence interval (CI) for vaccine efficacy is derived based on the Clopper and Pearson method 
adjusted to the surveillance time. CI not adju sted for multiplicity.
In the second primary  analy sis, compared to placebo, efficacy  of COVID -19 mRNA Vaccine 
in participants from first COVID- 19 occurrence from 7 day s after Dose 2 compared to 
participants with or without evidence of prior infection wi th SARS -CoV -2 was 94.6% (95% 
credible interval of 89.9% to 97.3%) in participants 16 y ears of age and older. 
Additionally , subgroup analy ses of the primary  efficacy  endpoint showed similar efficacy  
point estimates across genders, racial and ethnic groups, and participants with medical 
comorbidities associated with high risk of severe COVID -19.
10.2.Risks
Based on phar macovigilance monitoring activities, since first authorisation , anaphy laxis has 
been recognised as an important identified risk.Hypersensitivity  reactions ( other than 
Anaph ylaxis) Diarrhoea, Pain in extremity  (arm) and Vomiting were also assessed as 
ident ified risks (not important for the purpose of inclusion in the Risk Management Plans and 
Pharmacovigilance Plans) and added as adverse reactions to the labeling.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081257
PF-07302048 (BNT162b2) Reporting Period
Summary Monthly Safety Report (SMSR) 3 01 February 2021 through 28 February 2021
CONFIDENTIAL
Page 78Based on all available safety  and efficacy  data for BNT162b2 the benefit-risk profile of the 
vaccine remains favourable . 
10.3.Overall Benefit -Risk
The identified risksassociated with the use of BNT162b2 are mitigated through provision of 
relevant product information in the RSI  to support safe use of the product. Risks have been 
evaluated in the context of the enumerated benefits of the product. Based on the available 
safet y and efficacy data for BNT162b2, the overall b enefit -risk profile of BNT162b2 remains 
favourable. 
11.CONCLUSION AND ACTIO NS
The MAH will continue to review the safet y of BNT162b2, including reports of adverse 
experiences and will revise the product documents if an evaluation of the safety data yields 
significant new information.
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081258
COVID -19 m RNA Vaccine 12-Feb- 2021
CDS Version 1
PFIZER CONFIDENTIAL
1PREPARED BY PFIZER I NC
CDS EFFECTIVE DATE: 12-FEB -2021
Date of Superseded CDS: NA
COVID -19 mRNA Vaccine
CORE DATA SHEET
VERSION 1
Page 79
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081259
COVID -19 m RNA Vaccine 12-Feb- 2021
CDS Version 1
PFIZER CONFIDENTIAL
21. NAME OF THE MEDICINA L PRODUCT
COVID -19 mRNA Vaccine (nucleoside modified) and COMI RNATY are called 
TRADENAME.
2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION1,2
This is a multidose vial and must be diluted before use.
One vial (0.45 mL) contains 6 doses of 0.3 mL after dilution, see Section 6.6.
One dose (0.3 mL) contains 30 micrograms of COVID -19 mRNA Vaccine (embedded in lipid 
nanoparticles). 
TRADENAME is highl y purified single -stranded, 5’ -capped messenger RNA (mR NA) produced 
using a cell -free in vitro transcription from the corresponding DNA templates, encoding the viral 
spike (S) protein of severe acute respiratory  syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS -CoV -2).
For the full list of excipients, see Section 6.1.
3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM2,3
Concentrate for solution for injection.
The vaccine is a white to off- white frozen solution.
4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS
4.1. Therapeutic indications
The following is a representative indication. Locally  approved indications may  differ.
Active immuniz ation to prevent coronavirus disease 2019 ( COVID -19)disease caused by  
SARS -CoV -2 virus, in individuals 16 years of age and older.4
4.2. Posology and method of administration
Posology
Individuals 16 years of age and older
TRADENAME is administered intramuscularly after dilution as a series of 2doses (0.3 mL 
each) at greater than or equal to 21 days(preferably  3weeks) apart .5
There are no data available on the interchangeability  of TRADENAME with other COVID -19 
vaccines to comple te the vaccination series. Individuals who have received 1dose of 
TRADENAME should receive a second dose of TRADENAME to complete the vaccination 
series. 
Page 80
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081260
COVID -19 m RNA Vaccine 12-Feb- 2021
CDS Version 1
PFIZER CONFIDENTIAL
3Individuals may  not be protected until at least 7 days after their second dose of the vaccine.6
For further information on efficacy , see Section 5.1.
Pediatric population
The safet y and efficacy  of TRADENAME in individuals under 16 years of age have not yet been 
established. 
Geriatric population
Clinical studies of TRADENAME include participants 6 5years of age and older and their data 
contributes to the overall assessment of safet y and efficacy.7Of the total number of 
TRADENAME recipients in Study  2 (N=20,033), 17.1% (n=3434) were 65 through 74 years of 
age and 4.3% (n=860) were 75 years of age a nd older ( see Section 5.1).8
Method of administration
Administer TRADENAME intramuscularl y in the deltoid muscle after dilution.
Do not inject the vaccine intravascularl y, subcutaneously ,or intradermally. 
After dilution, vials of TRADENAME contain 6doses of 0.3 mL of vaccine. L ow dead-volume 
syringes and/or needles can be used to extract 6 doses from a single vial. If standard s yringes and 
needles are used, there may not be sufficient volume to extract a sixth dose from a single vial. 
Irrespective of the type of sy ringe and needle:
 Each dose must contain 0.3 mL of vaccine.
 If the amount of vaccine remaining in the vial cannot provide a full dose of 0.3 mL, discard 
the vial and any excess volume. 
 Do not pool excess vaccine from multiple vials.
For in structions on the handling, dilution ,and dose preparation of the vaccine before 
administration, see Section 6.6.
4.3. Contraindications
Hypersensitivity  to the active substance or to any  of the excipients listed in S ection 6.1.
4.4. Special warnings and precautions for use
Traceability
In order to improve the traceability  of biological medicinal products, the name and the batch 
number of the administered product should be clearly  recorded.
Page 81
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081261
COVID -19 m RNA Vaccine 12-Feb- 2021
CDS Version 1
PFIZER CONFIDENTIAL
4General recommendations
As with all injectable vaccines, appropriate medical treatment and supervision must alway s be 
readil y available in case of a rare anaph ylactic event following the administration of the 
vaccine.9
The administration of TRADENAME should be postponed in individuals suffering from acute 
sever e febrile illness .9
Individuals receiving anticoagulant therap y or those with a bleeding disorder that would 
contraindicate intramuscular injection, should not be given the vaccine unless the potential 
benefit clearl y outweighs the risk of administration.9
Immunocompromised persons, including individuals receiving immunosuppressant therap y, ma y 
have a diminished immune response to the vaccine.
As with any  vaccine, vaccination with TRADENAME may not protect all vaccine recipients.
4.5.Interaction with o ther medicinal products and other forms of interaction
No interaction studies have been performed.
Do not mix TRADENAME with other vaccines/products in the same s yringe.
4.6. Fertility, pregnancy and lactation
Pregnancy
There are limited amount of data from the use of TRADENAME in pregnant women. Animal 
studies do not indicate direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to pregnancy , embry o/fetal 
development, parturition ,or post -natal development (see Section 5.3).10,11Administration of 
TRADENAME in pregnancy  should be considered when the potential benefits outweigh any  
potential risks for the mother and fetus.
Lactation
It is unknown whether TRADENAME is excreted in human milk. 
Fertility
It is unknown whether TRAD ENAME has an impact on fertility . Animal studies do not indicate 
direct or indirect harmful effects with respect to female fertility  or reproductive toxicity  (see 
Section 5.3).10,11
Page 82
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081262
COVID -19 m RNA Vaccine 12-Feb- 2021
CDS Version 1
PFIZER CONFIDENTIAL
54.7. Effects on ability to drive and use machines
TRADENAME has no or negligible influence on the ability to drive and use machines. However, 
some of the effects mentioned under Section 4.8 “Undesirable effects” may temporaril y affect 
the ability  to drive or use machines.
4.8. Undesirable effects
Summar y of safet y profile
The safet y of TRADENAME was evaluated in participants 16 years of age and older in 2 clinical 
studies conducted in the United States, Europe, Turkey , South Africa, and South America.12
Study BNT162 -01 (Study 1) enrolled 60 participants , 18through 55 years of age. 
Study C4591001 (Study 2) enrolled approximately  44,000 participants, 12 years of age or 
older.12
In Stud y2, a total of 21,720 participants 16 years of age or older received at least 1dose of 
TRADENAME and a total of 21,728 participants 16 years of age or older received placebo.13
The most frequent adverse reactions in participants 16 years of age and older (in order from 
highest to lowest frequenc ies)were pain at the injection site (>80%) ,14fatigue (>60%) ,13
headache (>50%) ,13myalgia andchills (>30%) ,13arthralgia (>20%) ,13pyrexia13and injection 
site swelling14(>10%) and were usually  mild or moderate in intensit y and resolved within a few 
days after vaccination. A lower frequency  of reactogenicity  events was associated with greater 
age.15
Table 1. Adverse Drug Reactions13,14,16
System Organ Class Adverse Drug Reactions
Blood and l ymphatic sy stem 
disordersLym phadenopathy
Immune s ystem disorders Anaph ylaxis
Hypersensiti vityreactions ( e.g., rash, pruritus, urticaria,
angioedema)
Nervous s ystem disorders Headache
Gastrointestinal disorders Nausea
Musculoskeletal and connective 
tissue disorders Arthralgia
Myalgia
General disorders and 
administration site conditions Pyrexia
Chills
Malaise 
Fatigue
Injection site pain
Injection site swelling 
Injection site redness
Page 83
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081263
COVID -19 m RNA Vaccine 12-Feb- 2021
CDS Version 1
PFIZER CONFIDENTIAL
6The safet y profile in 545 participants receiving TRADENAME, that were seropositive for 
SARS -CoV -2 at baseline, was similar to that seen in the general population.17,28,31
4.9. O verdose
Participants who received 58 micrograms of TRADENAME in clinical trials did not report an 
increase in reactogenicit y or adverse events.18
In the event of overdose, monitoring of vital functions and possible sy mptomatic treatment is 
recommended.
5. PHARMACOLOGICAL P ROPERTIES
5.1. Pharmacodynamic properties
Pharmacological class, therapeutic class
Vaccines
Refer to the current ATC code index for the appropriate code assignment for the pharmacologic 
and/or therapeutic class. 
Mechanism of actio n
The nucleoside -modified messenger RNA in TRADENAME is formulated in lipid nanoparticles, 
which enable delivery  of the RNA into host cells to allow expression of the SARS -CoV -2 
Santigen. The vaccine elicits both neutralizing antibody  and cellular immune responses to the 
spike (S) antigen, which may  contribute to protection against COVID -19 disease.19,20
Efficacy  in participants 16 years of age and older
Study  2 is a multicent er, placebo -controlled efficacy  study  in participants 12 years of age and 
older. Randomi zation was stratified by  age: 12 through 15 years of age, 16 through 55 years of 
age, or 56 years of age and older, with a minimum of 40% of participants in the ≥56-year 
stratum .12The study  excluded participants who were immunocompromised an d those who had 
previous clinical or microbiological diagnosis of COVID -19 disease .12Participants with 
pre-existing stable disease, defined as disease not requiring significant change in therapy  or 
hospitalization for worsening disease during the 6 weeks before enroll ment ,21were included as 
were participants with known stable infection with human immunodeficiency  virus (HIV), 
hepatitis C virus (HCV), or hepatitis B virus (HBV) .12
In the Phase 2/3 portion approximately  44,000 participants 12 years of age and older were 
randomi zed equally  and received 2 doses of COVID -19 mRNA Vaccine or placebo separated b y 
21days. The efficacy  analy ses included participants that received their second vaccination 
within 19 to 42 days after their first vaccination. Participants are planned to be followed for up to 
24months, for assessments of safet y and efficacy against COVID -19 disease.12,27
Page 84
090177e19681e9ed\Approved\Approved On: 13-Mar-2021 06:18 (GMT)
FDA-CBER-2021-5683-1081264
COVID -19 m RNA Vaccine 12-Feb- 2021
CDS Version 1
PFIZER CONFIDENTIAL
7The population for the analy sis of the primary  efficacy  endpoint included, 36,621 participants 
12years of age and older (18,242 in the COVID -19 mRNA Vaccine group and 18,379 in the 
placebo group) who did not have evidence of prior infection with SARS -CoV -2 through 7 days 
after the second dose .22Table 2 presents the specific demographic characteristics in the studied 
population.
Table2.Demographics ( Population for the Primary Efficacy Endpoint)a,22
TRADENAME
(N=18,242)
n (%)Placebo
(N=18,379)
n (%)
Sex
Male 9318 (51.1) 9225 (50.2)
Female 8924 (48.9) 9154 (49.8)
Age (y ears)
Mean (SD) 50.6 (15.70) 50.4 (15.81)
Median 52.0 52.0
Min, max (12, 89) (12, 91)
Age group
12 to15 years 46 (0.3) 42 (0.2)
16 to 17 years 66 (0.4) 68 (0.4)
16 to 64 years 14,216 (77.9) 14,299 (77.8)
65 to 74 years 3176 (17.4) 3226 (17.6)
≥75 y ears 804 (4.4) 812 (4.4)
Race
White 15,110 (82.8) 15,301 (83.3)
Black or African American 1617 (8.9) 1617 (8.8)
American Indian or Alaska Native 118 (0.6) 106 (0.6)
Asian 815 (4.5) 810 (4.4)
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific 
Islander 48 (0.3) 29 (0.2)
Otherb534 (2.9) 516 (2.8)
Ethnicity
Hispanic or Latino 4886 (26.8) 4857 (26.4)
Not Hispanic or Latino 13,253 (72.7) 13,412 (73.0)
Not reported 103 (0.6) 110 (0.6)
Comorbiditiesc
Yes 8432 (46.2) 8450 (46.0)
No 9810 (53.8) 9929 (54.0)
a.All eligible randomized participants who receive all vaccination(s) as randomized within the predefined 
windo
…[truncated]